The Great War Against God-pt.2
Introduction
The Origin of Satan:
The Operation of Satan:
His Schemes:
כִּי is difficult since there is no exact parallel for it as a question, which is the traditional rendering (as NIV). Speiser comments, “The serpent is not asking a question; he is deliberately distorting a fact” (Genesis, 23). BHS recommends the emendation הַאַף (with interrogative). Cassuto retains the sense of question by taking כִּי as the interrogative and אַף as the emphatic (Genesis, 144). But intonation is a sufficient explanation since for yes/no questions the interrogative is not required (IBHS § 40.3.b).
The tactic used by the serpent was to cause doubt in the mind of the woman through interrogation and misrepresentation. First, the opponent does not controvert outright the saying of the Lord (2:16); rather, he questions God’s motivation with the subtle addition “really say.” Second, the serpent uses the name “God” rather than the covenant name “LORD” that has characterized the narrative of 2:4–25, where “LORD God” appears. Third, the serpent reworks the wording of God’s command slightly by (1) adding the negative “not” at the head of the clause, which with “any” expresses an absolute prohibition; (2) omitting the emphatic “freely”; (3) using the plural “you” (hence bypassing the man) rather than the singular as in 2:16; and (4) placing the clause “from any tree” at the end of the sentence rather than at the head as in 2:16, thereby robbing God’s command of its nuance of liberality. All of this is to say that the divine injunction in the mouth of the serpent was refashioned for its own interests.
His Methods
By lack of forgiveness/love;
By false doctrine:
By false brethren:
By false religion:
His Servants
An angel of light (ἀγγελον φωτος [aggelon phōtos]). The prince of darkness puts on the garb of light and sets the fashion for his followers in the masquerade to deceive the saints. “Like master like man.” Cf. 2:11 and Gal. 1:8. This terrible portrayal reveals the depth of Paul’s feelings about the conduct of the Judaizing leaders in Corinth. In Gal. 2:4 he terms those in Jerusalem “false brethren.”
In order to create a platform to teach their false gospel, the false prophets began assaulting Paul’s character. They wanted to take advantage of the tension between the apostle and the church. If they could convince the people to turn from Paul, the congregation would then be completely vulnerable to their own demonic doctrines. The situation became so crit-ical that Paul intervened personally. He referred to that episode as the “painful visit” (2:1). The tension in the church had broken out into public and personal attacks (2:5–8, 10; 7:12). Paul, realizing he had done what he could, left the city but followed up his visit with what he called the “severe letter” (2:4) that Titus carried to Corinth on Paul’s behalf (7:5–16).
Sometime later, eager for news about Corinth, Paul traveled to meet Titus (2:13). His younger associate gave Paul the news that the majority of the Corinthians had repented of their rebellion against him (7:7). When Paul wrote this letter (2 Corinthians), he was intent on rejoicing for the church (7:8–16), warning them about dangers ahead by confronting the false apostles (chapters 10–13), and, particularly, reestablishing his reputation and authority among them by defending his apostleship (chapters 1–)