Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.15UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.61LIKELY
Joy
0.6LIKELY
Sadness
0.2UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.7LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.57LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.86LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.74LIKELY
Extraversion
0.04UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.49UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.67LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Notes
Malachi - Sermon 1
1.Introduction
1.Book Intro - Malachi has a burden
1.Why Read Malachi
1.The prophet has a significant message that is timeless
2.You Will recognize Several Statements in this book
3.It serves as the key bridge between the Old Testament and the New Testament.
John the Baptists birth and the associated events directly reference prophecies in this book.
2.History
1.100 years after Cyrus decreed the return, and after Ezra and Nehemiah.
2.“Malachi encountered the same sins of Israel that had been earlier met by Ezra in 458 BC and by Nehemiah in 444 BC.” John Walvoord
3.His Method: “Malachi would ask questions of priests or other people, and there would be a dispute concerning the answer.
Malachi in the process would offer proof that his charges and corrections were justified.”
Walvoord
4.Themes -
1.Calling the People to task for their unfaithfulness,
2.God’s purposes beyond Israel.
3.looking to the future coming of Messiah,
4.all rooted in God’s love for and commitment for His people,
5.Application
1.The key idea as we seek to apply this message to us is this - the standard against Israel is measured is the Mosaic covenant, the Law esp. in the first five books of Moses.
We are not under the law, and through the Spirit we have far more resources than they did to live a God honoring life.
2.But, we too may need to be taken to task for our unfaithfulness.
As we work through this, I will seek to point out the NT obligations we are under that are similar.
Sometimes, it might be different (such as giving or the question of those married to unbelievers).
Sometimes, it might be the same (such as the question of divorce).
But remember--we are under the rule of grace, not law, and that rule brings more divine enablement but in reality even greater responsibilities and duties.
2.God’s Intro - He Loves Israel (vv2-5)
1.Now, there is right from the get go a key Cross Reference about a challenging Bible Doctrine.
I don’t want to sidetrack from the point here in Malachi, but we do need to consider it briefly.
Rom 9:9-13 “For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son.
And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;) It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger.
As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.”
2.The focus of the passage seems to be on the special love God has for Israel as contrasted with the hatred that God has for Edom in light of his wickedness.
One book about the issue of God’s sovereignty and man’s free will comments on Malachi 1:2 saying that this “is not speaking of them before they were born but long after they lived.”
It is true that other verses used in Romans make a point that God chose Israel over Esau before they were born, but that isn’t the point in context here.
3.God judges Esau’s land – Edom (vv3b-4)
1.They persist in trying to keep going and building back up but God promises to win in the end
2.Some call v2 this a hatred of degree, meaning that God doesn’t literally hate Esau but simply loved Israel all the more.
3.But perhaps more important and explanatory is that in v4b that Esau was known for wickedness.
This pares out with the general line of Edom’s history back to when he refused to let Israel pass through their land.
See Num 20:14ff.
there is some hint that Esau will never be inhabited again (HYPERLINK "https://ref.ly/logosref/BibleNASB95.Je49"Jer 49).
4.KEY: God did choose Jacob over Esau before either had done any works.
(As Rom 9:11 says) God rightly hates Esau due to his sins.
The point of bringing up Esau is merely to contrast the present state of God’s hatred for Easu with his continuing love for .
However, he also cannot rightly ignore His promise of love for Israel even as He sees sin in Israel.
4.Benediction of God being exalted outside even Israel (v5)
1.KEY: Note alternate translation of “beyond Israel” as opposed to KJV “from Israel.
2.God triumphs over men.
Our God is glorious.
3.NOTE: While this book is essentially a message for the Jews, clearly God wants them to take away things concerning the Gentiles as this will be repeated.
5.Conclusion: Jacob did not deserve the favor shown to him, but God loves Him.
This is the foundation for all that God is about to say to Israel in this weighty book.
God’s love for His people moves Him to deal with the sin He is seeing here.
2.Rebuke of Priests (1:6 through 2:9)
2.Faulty sacrifices (1:6-14)
1.General Indictment (1:6-7)
1.Attitude - At least one translation uses the word despised to refer to their attitude to both God’s name and His table
2.Action - offer bad sacrifices (1:8-9)
1.CROSS REF: “Blind, or broken, or maimed, or having a wen, or scurvy, or scabbed, ye shall not offer these unto the LORD, nor make an offering by fire of them upon the altar unto the LORD.”
Lev 22:22, and “And if there be any blemish therein, as if it be lame, or blind, or have any ill blemish, thou shalt not sacrifice it unto the LORD thy God” Deut 15:21
2.The Lord’s Pleading - The wish of the Lord - Stop (1:9-11)
1.Prayer is not the answer.
2.General statement (1:10)
3.Explanation: He doesn’t need them, all will one day offer to God. (1:11, c.f. v14).
This statement should’ve warned the self-righteous Jews of Jesus’ time who despised the Gentiles.
One wonders how much we are tempted to the same kind of attitudes against others.
3.Specific Indictments - They hate the table (vv12-14)
1.They profane the table with their words
1.They view it as polluted (alt.
reading defiled) at its best (v12a)
1.This is from the priest’s perspective.
One is tempted to question how a priest could possibly view the table of the very ministry to which they were called as defiled/
2.There was one specific table in the temple service--and it was the table of shewbread upon which the holy bread was put.
3.We see this kind of error today when what is good is seen as polluted.
2.Contemptible (alt.
reading despised) (v12b)
1.Here the focus is on the results of this table.
It is worthless.
2.The results are thought to be wrong.
We see that today when Biblical commands about familial discipline, or sexual morality, or any other things.
3.Tiresome (v13a)
1.This seems a even more in tune with our tendency in modern culture.
2.Do you regard even just coming here to church as sometime tiresome?
Aren’t we tempted to do so?
4.Disdain it (v13b)
1.c.f.
back to v12 about contempt.
5.Climax: They defile it with stolen goods (v13c) and not the best (v13d)
1.Alt.
Read: This is an alt.
translation from the KJV which has “torn, lame, and sick”
2.The one who violates this is cursed (v14)
1.The LORD is great, and His fear is among all.
(v14a)
1.To be sure, some in Malachi’s time did not fear God in Israel or out of Israel.
2.But remember what the nations said after God redeemed Israel from Egypt
2.For God’s people, Our Sonship changes this.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9