Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.14UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.12UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.58LIKELY
Sadness
0.57LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.55LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.05UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.69LIKELY
Extraversion
0.1UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.41UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.67LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
fingerprints
Revelation 3:20 .
Genesis 3:10 .
-So we were told the Creation account
-and now here in chapter 2, we’re backing up and we’re catching up on all the details that were left out in chapter 1.
-So I want to take a look at this very first verse: This is the account of the heavens and the earth...”
-The esv says “these are the “generations” of the heavens and the earth.
“This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created.”
-The word there means
-The english standard says “These are the generations of the heaven and the earth.”
-The New king james says “this is the history” of the heavens and the earth
-the Christian Standard says “These are the records of the heavens and the earth”
-The word literally is “Genesis”
-In fact this is where we get the name for our book “the book of ‘genesis’
-and the word Genesis means “ancestry” or “point of origen”
-It is another way of saying “this is the beginning”
and so if we wanted to translate this verse as literally as possible:
We would read “This is the book of the Genesis of the heavens and the earth”
-And the reason that this phrase is so important, turn with me to Matthew Chapter 1
-Guess what the word there for Geneology is?
“Genesis”
-This is the book of the Genesis of Jesus the Messiah.
-See it’s no mistake that what we have with the coming of Jesus is a Re-do of the fiasco that happened here in Genesis
-We talked last week about how Jesus brings forth new creation, and here again we see more fingerprints of Jesus
-We see the idea that even in creation We’re being pointed to Jesus
-Even in the way God waters the earth.
-See rain is fleeting
-Rain comes and goes
-But a spring, that’s a source of water that goes on forever.
-With that in mind, turn to John chapter 4
-Even here in the details about the way God water the earth
-He’s pointing us to the ultimate source of water
-The ultimate source of Life.
-In fact every thing that God does in creation to bring life into theworld
-Jesus does for us
-Look at the way in which God forms adam:
-The word there for breath is also the same word for spirit
-God literally breathed his spirit into adam.
-And we see in John chapter 20, after Jesus had ressurected and he had promised the coming of the Holy Spirit we read:
-So back in Genesis we have these streams coming up from inside the earth
-God takes the dust and forms a man, and breathes life into him
-And then we learn a little more about the stream from the earth
-We have this splitting of the waters into four, that go out into all the earth
-how fitting is it that the source of life, the waters which well up from the earth
-the waters which represent Christ
-Are split into four
-And the source of life that we find, the accounts of Jesus
-all derive from one story of Christ
-But they show up in four different accounts of the gospel
-And those four different accounts all had different points of view, and went into different parts of the world for different reasons
-but they all originated with Christ
Genesis 2:15-25
-So out of the Dust we have God creating this man
-He sets him in the garden to keep it, and watch over it
-The word there gives the idea of a steward of a castle
-And the job of the steward is two-fold
-The first is to keep up with the maintenence and the duties,
-and the keep the ground, and to take care of it
-But the second task that is implied in the word is to guard and protect it
-The original language gives us this idea that Adam was to Guard eden
-But if everything God made was Good, we have to ask ourselves
-what is he guarding it from?
-What could adam possibly protect God’s good creation from?
-And we might say well it was the serpent, it was satan
-But as we’ll see here in a minute, satan didn’t DO anything
-All he did was talk
-all he did was deceive
-but he didn’t actually DO anything
-IT was adam and eve who did the DO-ing
-They are the ones who brought sin and death into the world
-See Adam was put in charge of protecting eden from himself
-Because Satan has NO power to DO anything
-the only power he has is to convince US to sin
-So just as a side note, when you’re being tempted by sin, when satan is trying to get you to be lead astray
-remember that HE doesn’t have any power
-If you make the choice to resist him, than you have taken away all of his power
-and what’s more, you have an advocate, you have the breath of the holy spirit within you who is fighting on your behalf
-You have a savior who defeated Satan once and for all
-And the only power satan has is the power you give him.
-But as much as we can draw parallells between Adam and US
-I want to take a minute and see how we compare Adam to Christ
-I want to see how the fingerprints of Jesus are on Adam
-Turn with me to Romans chapter 5 please
-Did you catch that?
-Paul recognized that Adam was not a pattern for us
-but that he was a pattern for Christ
-And he points out some very key differences
-And one of the biggest ways that we see these patterns of Christ in the Old testament is by noticing that there are an awful lot of similarities between the things that happened to the Old testament person and Jesus
-But every time we have these patterns we’ll see that they are never ever ever “perfect” patterns
-One of the problems we run into is the fact that we don’t always have perfect english words to describe things in our translations
The NLT in that verse says
And the ESV says
-And the word “Type” is probably the most accurate word
-But only if we understand the fact that we don’t mean type as in “kind”
-Adam isn’t a “kind” of Christ
-He’s a type of christ in the same way that we use the word “type-writer”
-Different kind of type
-has anyone here ever typed on an actual type-writer
-I mean an actual mechanical type-writer with the arms and the stamp and the ink
-You’ll notice that if you look at something typed on a typewriter with a magnifying glass there will always be imperfections
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9