Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.54LIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.15UNLIKELY
Joy
0.56LIKELY
Sadness
0.52LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.62LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.41UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.87LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.81LIKELY
Extraversion
0.05UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.49UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.65LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
-God’s attribute of being eternal has to be held as a lamp to shine light on so many of His other attributes and the way in which He interacts with the world.
But because we are not eternal, we can’t fully grasp all the implications of that.
We might be able to have a slight philosophical idea of what being eternal means (i.e.
God has no beginning or end; God has no dimension or parts; God is not restricted by time or space, etc.).
But when we try to explore beyond that, it almost blows a fuse in brains because, being His creature, we are nothing like that.
In fact, there is no one or nothing else like that.
-So, we read books like Daniel, and we learn (like we did in chapter 10) that God has a book of truth that appears to lay out all of history.
And we learn in Psalm 139 that God has a book for our own lives?
Does that mean that God merely knows what is going to happen?
Does it mean that God causes what is going to happen?
Is it a little of both?
We know that God is not and cannot be the author of evil, but that might just mean moral evil (that which goes against His character and standard).
It doesn’t necessarily mean God won’t move us toward trials or at minimum allow trials to happen.
We may not like the trials of life, but that doesn’t automatically put them in the category of evil.
-But all of this speculation is where God’s eternality comes into play.
God is sovereign, meaning He is in control.
God is providential, meaning He is involved in pretty much everything and moving things along according to His good pleasure.
(Again, not causing moral evils, nor forcing evil people to do evil things).
And this doesn’t even necessarily take away free will, but God in His sovereignty and providence can take the evil actions from the free will of humans and use them to somehow further His cause without Himself being the cause or author of evil.
We don’t get it—we can’t comprehend it.
All we can do is chalk it up to His being eternal.
God can do that because He’s God.
And so, sometimes we just have to trust Him because we know His other attributes—that He is good and loyal to those with whom He has a covenant.
-And so we come to Daniel 11, part of a vision given to Daniel by an angel, but the vision comes out of the book of truth—God’s plans within history.
And the angel shares specifically what is going to be happening with Daniel’s people, the Israelites, over the next several centuries.
This chapter specifically deals with a time period in which the remnant of the Greco-Macedonian empire has control over the land of Israel, and what is described is not very good.
Yet, God has sovereignly decreed it, and what is in Daniel’s future is in our past, and we can see that the path for Israel that was prophesied has come to fruition.
And never once did God lose control.
-And the prophesies of what is to come have so much detail to them that some think it was written after the fact—but it wasn’t.
It was in the book.
And it reads almost like a soap opera as the Ptolemies of Egypt and the Seleucids of Syria go toe to toe politically and militarily, and Israel is stuck in the middle.
And it is all happening as God prophesied and somehow all of it is usable by an eternal God to further His cause.
And all we can do is say AMEN.
AS YOU HAVE SAID!
-And yes, just like He did with an entire nation, God can use circumstances (both good and bad) in our own lives to get us to be who He wants us to be and do what He wants us to do—and we don’t lose our free will and God never loses His sovereignty, and we have to be OK with not being able to understand, but just praise Him in awe of who He is and what He is able to do.
So, what did God have in the book of truth for Israel.
We saw some of it last week, but we will continue...
-Where we pick up the story, Antiochus the Great defeated the Egyptians and gained control of Israel.
Antiochus forced a treaty with the Ptolemies, and to seal the agreement Antiochus gave his daughter Cleopatra (no, not that Cleopatra) to Ptolemy V as a wife.
Antiochus hoped that through Cleopatra he would gain further control over Egypt, but the plan “did not stand/succeed” because Cleopatra loved her husband and completely supported the cause of the Ptolemies.
-Seeing that he couldn’t manipulate his daughter to create a puppet government within the Ptolemies, Antiochus turned to conquering the coastlands, but the up-and-coming Romans fought against him and defeated him.
So, the Seleucids were forced to sign a treaty with the Romans that caused them to have to give up some territory and pay Rome lots of money and give 20 hostages over to the Romans.
-Due to this devastating defeat, an angry mob of his own people killed him, and his son Sleucus IV Philopater took over, but he was soon killed by his tax collector who sought to gain the throne for himself.
-Philopater’s son, Demetrius, should have been given the throne, but he was one of the hostages sent to Rome.
So Philopater’s brother, Antiochus IV, seized power through cunning and intrigue.
This Antiochus referred to himself as Epiphanes, the “Manifest One” or “Illustrious One,” but others called him Epimanes which means “The Madman.”
Egypt tried to attack him, thinking the kingdom was weak with all the political infighting, but Antiochus soundly defeated them.
-Antiochus wanted to Hellenize all areas (meaning he wanted to introduce Greek culture everywhere).
This included Israel where he got heavily involved in their politics and religion.
As it says, he deposed the prince of the covenant, meaning that he ousted the Jewish High Priest at that time, named Onias III.
And what Antiochus did was give the High Priest position to whoever the highest bidder was, doing some political maneuvering to keep a strong hand upon Israel.
And as the passage said, Antiochus took much of the wealth out of Israel and redistributed it to His supporters throughout his empire.
-In 170 BC the Ptolemies attempted to recapture Israel, but they again were defeated by Antiochus.
And because of this rash move, Antiochus in turn invaded Egypt and was able to take Ptolemy VI Philometor prisoner.
Philometer had followed bad advice from members of the Egyptian court, leading to his being deposed and captured.
-Powerful Egyptian nobles then crowned Ptolemy VII, who was Philometor’s brother, as the new king.
Antiochus actually teamed up with Ptolemy VI (whom he had captured) and together they deposed Ptolemy VII, although it obviously was a very shaky alliance.
This seems to be the background for 11:27, talking about a fake truce, each telling lies, and nothing came of it.
-While Antiochus was off fighting this battle, a false report went out throughout Israel that stated Antiochus was killed which stirred up an insurrection among the Jews.
But Antiochus went through Israel on his way back to Syria (carrying much wealth with him) and he quickly squelched the insurrection: killing 80,000 people and taking another 40,000 hostage.
So, because of the insurrection, he set his heart against the holy covenant, stealing much out of the temple before returning to Syria.
This was just the beginning of persecutions.
-A short time after Antiochus returned to his capital, he learned that Ptolemy VI Philometor and Ptolemy VII agreed to ruse Egypt together.
Antiochus had hoped that they would instead be rivals and weaken each other so that Egypt was no longer a threat.
And then Egypt negotiated an alliance with Rome.
Furious, Antiochus set out for Egypt with his armies.
This invasion, however, would not be like the last one.
This time ships from the west (which refers to Roman forces) intercepted Antiochus on his way to Alexandria.
The Roman ambassador met him at Eleusis, which was four miles from Alexandria, and presented Antiochus with the decree of the Roman senate.
Antiochus replied that he would need to consider what he would do.
It is said that the ambassador drew a line around Antiochus on the ground with a rod and said, “I must have a reply to give to the senate before you leave this circle.”
Antiochus submitted to the demands, and turned around from Egypt.
-Frustrated with this defeat, and also frustrated with the Israelite refusal to take on Greek culture, he began a severe persecution against the Jews.
Antiochus soon prohibited the regular burnt offerings at the temple and he set up within the temple the abomination that makes desolate—he set up within the temple an altar to the Greek god Zeus.
-In response the Maccabees led a revolt by the Israelites against Antiochus.
Unfortunately, many apostate Jews took sides with Antiochus in order to save their lives.
All Jews were forced to choose between faithfulness to God with the possibility of losing their lives, or become apostate and not be killed by Antiochus.
Many chose death over unfaithfulness.
-Listen to how one particular martyr is described in the apocryphal book of...
-This was in the God’s book of truth.
And it has happened throughout history, God’s faithful are martyred.
And God has not lost control.
And God gets glory for it.
-We go forward into an unknown, scary future, and we don’t know what’s going to happen to us.
But we know the one who has it in control and is moving it toward a purpose.
We notice here that the OT saints were not spared heartache, nor were they spared from the judgment brought against the nation.
Why would we be surprised that we experience the same?
And yet, many of those OT saints did not turn their back on God, but decided to trust Him even more.
May be choose to do the same.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9