Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.44UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.55LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.56LIKELY
Confident
0.54LIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.96LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.62LIKELY
Extraversion
0.08UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.17UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.71LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Body
Between Adam and Noah
Dispensation of Conscience
A time of incredible violence
Genesis 6:13 “13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.”
Violence: “violence, particularly physical violence, wrong"
Same word is used in scriptures such as:
Psalm 11:5 “5 The Lord trieth the righteous: But the wicked and him that loveth violence his soul hateth.”
Proverbs 4:17 “17 For they eat the bread of wickedness, And drink the wine of violence.”
Man’s full time job was to devise new and improved ways to commit evil
Genesis 6:5 “5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”
Jesus compares the end days to the days of Noah
Matthew 24:37-39 “37 But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, 39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”
There were Giants in the earth in those days
Nephilim
Genesis 6:2 “2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.”
Genesis 6:4 “4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.”
Modern translations translate “giants” to “Nephilim”
Numbers 13:32-33 “32 And they brought up an evil report of the land which they had searched unto the children of Israel, saying, The land, through which we have gone to search it, is a land that eateth up the inhabitants thereof; and all the people that we saw in it are men of a great stature.
33 And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.”
Numbers 13:33 (ESV) — 33 And there we saw the Nephilim (the sons of Anak, who come from the Nephilim), and we seemed to ourselves like grasshoppers, and so we seemed to them.”
Mention again the antediluvian climate and environment
Increased atmospheric pressure
Increased oxygen levels
No cosmic radiation to contend with
One is popular but quite unscriptural, stating that the Nephilim were space aliens.
Of those four that have some biblical support:
Fallen angels bred with women and resulted in giants called Nephilim (most popular of the four)
The sons of God were the result of fallen angels who overtook ungodly men to breed with women
The were the Sethites (descendants of Adam’s son Seth).
There are some variations that fall under this theory
Godly men took ungodly wives, and their descendants (Nephilim) followed after false gods, rejected the One True God, and fell far from God into wickedness.
Which view is correct?
I believe the most biblical view is the fourth (Godly men took ungodly wives, and their descendants (Nephilim) followed after false gods, rejected the One True God, and fell far from God into wickedness.)
In Genesis 6:1, Genesis 6:2, and Genesis 6:3 the Hebrew word used here means “man” or “mankind”
Same word used all through the O.T. to indicate mankind as a whole.
Human beings, not human/fallen angel mix
The testimony of Jesus
Matthew 22:23-30 “23 The same day came to him the Sadducees, which say that there is no resurrection, and asked him, 24 Saying, Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.
25 Now there were with us seven brethren: and the first, when he had married a wife, deceased, and, having no issue, left his wife unto his brother: 26 Likewise the second also, and the third, unto the seventh.
27 And last of all the woman died also.
28 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven?
for they all had her.
29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.”
Do fallen angel possess the proper anatomy to produce children with men?
Marriage, the entire reproductive process, is given to humans to populate the earth, and, more specifically, to produce godly seed
That’s not a requirement of immortal spirits
The same word is used for the Nephilim in the book of Numbers, who were not survivors of the flood, but were born post-flood, and were most certainly simply very large humans.
Noah
Man’s wickedness is so great that God is going to destroy them Himself!
He’s not sending an agent to bring judgment
He’s intervening Himself
God finds one righteous and so will not only spare him, but uses him to warn his generation
Hebrews 11:7 “7 By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith.”
II Peter 2:5 “5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;”
Given very specific instructions as to how to build the Ark
The Ark was not built to sail upon the waters, but to simply float.
The Ark was built for sturdiness and for room
When God gives details, those details are extremely important!
Details in the Word of God
Details in what He expects of His people
Details in what He’s commanded us to do, and to be
Instructed to take seven of every clean beast and two of the unclean
Clean were for sacrifice, and later, for meat
Clean were the domesticated animals, the unclean were predators and those not good for meat or sacrifice
He is 120 years in building the Ark and preaching to his generation
And then the rains begin to fall
The Flood
Universal flood vs. a Local flood: Why we assert a universal flood
First of all, why do people want to believe in a local flood?
Geology “indicates” billions of years
Fossil record “indicates” millions of years
A universal flood speaks to catastrophism when people want to believe in uniformitarianism
Define terms
The Depth of the Flood
Genesis 7:19-20 “19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.”
A measure of the waters is now made by comparison with the only available standard for such waters — the mountains.
They are said to have been “covered.”
Not merely a few but “all the high mountains under all the heavens.”
One of these expressions alone would almost necessitate the impression that the author intends to convey the idea of the absolute universality of the Flood, e.g., “all the high mountains.”
Yet since “all” is known to be used in a relative sense, the writer removes all possible ambiguity by adding the phrase “under all the heavens.”
A double “all” cannot allow for so relative a sense.
It almost constitutes a Hebrew superlative.
So we believe that the text disposes of the question of the universality of the flood.
—H.C.
Leopold, Exposition of Genesis
The Duration of the Flood
From the time that the forty days of rain started to the time that God declared the earth dried and commanded Noah to exit the Ark was 371 days
Imagine the amount of water that would need to explode out of the earth as well as pour from the sky to cover all the mountains in six weeks!
Imagine the absolute destruction, the complete devastation that would cause (fault lines, plate tectonics shifting, etc.)
A local flood would have drained off much earlier
The Geology of the Flood
Genesis 7:11 “11 In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.”
This references Genesis 1:2-10 where God divided and fixed the waters above and below the firmament, and specifically in Genesis 1:2 referring to the “deep”
Scripture indicates that this “breaking up of the deep” lasted for a staggering 150 days, ending in Genesis 8:2 “2 The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained;”
This is very strong evidence for a universal, rather than a local flood
The Size of the Ark
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9