Sermon Transcript Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.58LIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.6LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.41UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.3UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.9LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.72LIKELY
Extraversion
0.28UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.56LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.57LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Opening prayer.
I'd really father.
We thank you for this season, as we have quickly towards winter than days are getting shorter.
The nights are getting longer, seems like we're on a downhill Sprint.
Everything seems to be moving quicker and yet you have provided for us, the means and the opportunity to gather together.
We might be able to study your word, find ourselves turning and focusing upon you upon your thinking about your light and your life that you provided for us.
We thank you for all of this.
And we all see my guide is today, as we study your word, Lord, that you might Quicken are thinking that you might enable our souls are Hearts.
The core of thinking to understand what it is.
We're reviewing and going through today.
And that your word would be teaching us.
We asked that we might be transferred.
For Your Glory, that you would be proclaimed and exalted through all eternity because of the Magnificent work that you do in our midst, in our hearts and all the things we bring to you and we pray in the precious name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
Amen.
Right at the last second.
Everything.
Ostensibly started working.
Peers, like it is.
So
two weeks ago, we return to the text of James chapter 3.
And we begin looking at the context.
Rather than jump straight in and begin to ice sujeet, the text.
Whoops.
Did anyone else catch that?
I hear D chuckling back there.
As it turns out.
Notice I didn't say exegete the text which is to take out from, what is there.
But I said I suggest
And I suggest she is to be is to read into the text.
What isn't there?
Put into at what we want to see expect to see or are misinformed of that.
We will see Rugs exegete.
Name the, we pull from the text.
That which is there.
So exegesis.
I have up on the screen is the interpretation of a word or passage particularly scripture by forming ideas based on what is in the text.
And only what is in the text.
So we want to find what is there and draw it out?
I sujeet for eisegesis is the interpretation of a word or passage by reading into.
It one's own idea to place or Force an idea on to the text.
now, if we are not aware of the contact, For the presuppositions that we bring to the text.
That is exactly what we will do.
Read into it.
We will ice Ajit less.
Biblically aware.
You are the more unfamiliar you are with the Bible with scripture.
The greater the presuppositions are that you bring to your reading or your study that aren't valid.
The more you will ice, Angie For example.
There are those who believe they think in their soul that there is no God.
And so when they come to the bible to read through it, that is their perspective.
What are these then?
What what are these words?
One of these books, what is it?
They see in the text.
They see the Museum of Man, pretending to be something.
He is not talking about a guy that does not exist, pretty enough for creating a reason to be able to drive and Marshall people to move in the direction.
They want them to move.
They come up with all kinds of interesting Back stories, they decide that there was not one person who wrote Isaiah, three people who wrote that the books of Matthew and Luke and John we're not the original text Mark may have been closer to it, but they say there was a another writing out there somewhere that when everything else was copied from and based upon They come up with these ideas because they do not believe in God and they come up with these ideas because they do not believe in the Supernatural.
It is not possible for there to be a supernatural.
They say they're for the Miracles are not really Miracles.
They are just illustrations, they are teachings throughout scripture.
Well, we come with the free supposition.
That God is real that God is above all creation, he created it.
Therefore there is a supernatural that which is above and beyond all of creation.
And the spiritual life is a supernatural life because it comes from God exists.
In God, was made available by God and cannot exist without God, that makes it Supernatural.
The spiritual life, though.
It be by Grace.
Let's not fool ourselves.
It is a supernatural event going on in our lives and our souls.
So what we bring as a priest opposition will determine what we see in the text.
The best way to quickly.
I Sergey to text and it's to the context neglect, the context of who wrote it, why it was written.
What?
The internal messages in Maddie pistol or book or gospel.
Half the same eclectus, things just start reading it, right?
And make it mean something, without first respecting The contacts.
I want to mention that word respect for a moment, that is what our goal is.
That is my goal as the pastor teacher, is to respect the Ducks.
It doesn't matter what my opinion is.
What matters is what the opinion of the text is, doesn't care.
It doesn't matter what I think.
On the matter, all you should care about is why God's word thinks about the matter.
There's a conflict between me and my thoughts and my way of thinking and God's word.
Then obviously there is only one true Way, only one, right thing?
You should pay attention to.
So we don't ever want to I sajitha text.
We always want to exegete and that is why we review what came before, what follows study Concepts in the passage examine language and grammar, make sure we are aware of culture or geography so that our ideas don't end up seeing what we see because our goal is to us, is to accurately, understand only, what is there in the text and the teach that
so, in terms of Jane, Chapter one.
Refugee James chapter 3. I skipped over it.
No, I won't play that cuz I will be confusing.
My flight says, John 3. My computer here says James 3, I'm not sure how the one isn't talking to the other.
But okay, so we're going to go over a summary of what we have learned so far in the book of James.
So two weeks ago, we read through chapter 3, to expose ourselves in general, to what the following context is from verse one, all the way through the end of the chapter, which is in general, the role of the word or words that come from our mouths.
What we say matters, we reviewed the thesis statement of the book that James wrote to the very young Church to teach what to do as Believers were tested and tested in their Doctrine.
So we came up with a theme Is divine, Viewpoint is tested Your Divine Viewpoint or your functioning in Bible.
Doctrine is going to be tested James wrote to the very
Sorry, just won't leave my slides here.
Who James wrote the first book of the New Testament to be written.
She looks very young Church to teach it what to do to deal with the test of Doctrine, and when Divine, Viewpoint is challenge.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9