Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.5UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.58LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.74LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.32UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.97LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.58LIKELY
Extraversion
0.17UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.7LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.66LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
There have been many questions concerning the three days Jesus spent in the grave.
In fact, I call this period what happened between John 19:42 and John 20.
The gospel writer, John, does not seem to interested in this period as he goes right from the burial to the resurrection.
The following things seem to be important to John:
The trial of Jesus (John 18:28-40)
The crucifixion of Jesus (John 19:1-27)
The death of Jesus (John 19:28-37)
The burial of Jesus (John 19:38-42)
The resurrection of Jesus (John 20)
These events seems to be the primary and ultimate concern of the gospel writer.
However, other writers of the New Testament have more to say about the events that convened.
In fact, the other apostles who were eye witnesses of the things that occured around the resurrection of Jesus Christ fill in the details in a way that John doesn’t care to share.
To answer our inquiry on the things that happened between John 19:42 and John 20, we will depend on two credible witnesses: 1) the apostle Peter, and 2) the apostle Paul.
However, before we get into their testimonies, we must solve the debate of whether Jesus died a physical or spiritual death.
Spiritual or Physical Death?
Within Pentecostal churches, there are many that have posited Jesus’s death was spiritual.
However, the dangerous proposition is that Jesus died a spiritual death, only.
The problem with this notion, is that there are passages that allow one to reasonable argue that Jesus died a spiritual death.
Yet, there are also passages that demonstrate Jesus died a physical death.
On one side, these passages reveal that Jesus died in the flesh, a physical death.
However, the following speakers demonstrate the expectation that the Messiah would not “decay.”
To decay means to endure decomposition of organic matter.
What can be said about these verses in lieu of Jesus’s physical death?
How could Jesus die a physical death if His body was not to decay?
Here, I conclude that the Scriptures testify the miracle of Jesus’s death.
For, though He died, His body did not decay or deconstruct.
Furthermore, Jesus did not stay in the grave.
For He was resurrected.
Now, that we see there is no discrepancy or contradiction between the idea of Jesus’s physical death and His burial, we must now ask, again, what happened between John 19:42 and John 20.
We know that Jesus’s body is not decaying in the grave.
Furthermore, we recognize Jesus’s burial is not as the average individual’s.
While the apostle John does not care to mention the events that occured during Jesus’s burial, the other apostles identify a tremendous fact about Jesus’s ultimate authority over all things, and this is the power of Jesus’s burial.
Jesus’s Cosmic Authority
If we are to understand the mysterious events of Jesus’s burial, we must understand the authority that was given to Jesus because of His bodily death and resurrection.
Two things were accomplished:
The overthrow of the traditional law.
The overthrow of the spiritual powers which manipulate the conditions of this world.
It is important to recognize the various views of this particular passage.
First, Augustine, and since him many others, understood the text to refer to Christ’s preaching through Noah to those who lived while Noah was building the ark.
According to this view, Christ was not personally present but spoke by means of the Holy Spirit through Noah.
The spirits are not literally in prison but refer to those who were snared in sin during Noah’s day.
If this view is correct, any notion of Christ descending into hell is excluded.
Second, some have understood Peter as referring to Old Testament saints who died and were liberated by Christ between his death and resurrection.
Third, others understand the imprisoned spirits to refer, as in 4:6, to the sinful human beings who perished during Noah’s flood.
Christ in the interval between his death and resurrection descended to hell and preached to them, offering them the opportunity to repent and be saved.
Most of those who adopt such an interpretation infer from this that God will offer a second chance to all those in hell, especially to those who never heard the gospel.
If salvation was offered to the wicked generation of Noah, surely it will also be extended to all sinners separated from God. Fourth, the majority view among scholars today is that the text describes Christ’s proclamation of victory and judgment over the evil angels.
(Schreiner, T. R. (2003).
1, 2 Peter, Jude (Vol.
37, pp.
184–185).
Broadman & Holman Publishers.)
Our Lord therefore, between His death on the Cross and His resurrection from Joseph’s tomb, preached to the fallen angels in Tartarus.
But what did He preach to them?
The word translated “preached” here is kerusso (κερυσσο).
The word was used in secular Greek of an official announcement or proclamation made by a representative of a government.
Conclusion: Empowerment
So, the conclusion that one must make concerning what Christ has done is the equipping of the saints with the power of Christ.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9