Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.44UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.05UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.15UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.19UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.63LIKELY
Confident
0.24UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.95LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.36UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.47UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.04UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.45UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Dealing With Militant Unbelievers
 
We live in an age where unbelief has taken on an attack mode.
Many do not just not believe but are militantly attacking the concept of God, Jesus, and the bible.
Most of these attacks are not new but a rehash of what has been said before.
Many in their attacks on the bible consistently attack the concept of inspiration by claiming contradictions.
Others want to have the early church made up of many different ideas on Jesus (with the idea that ALL such beliefs were valid and acceptable).
One of the biggest objections come from trying to shoe-horn the writers of the 1st century into the methodologies of 21st century writers.
Our way of dealing with history has to be theirs.
Our way of writing biographies has to be theirs.
Dealing with such ‘contradictions’ has been standard fare for apologists for many years.
Many tend to be rather easy (a complete misunderstanding of the Bible, presuppositions in reading texts, etc.)
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9