Advent 2- Love
There is a profound awe that comes when we pause and think about how the omnipotent God came to live among us. Incarnation is the fancy word for God condescending to humanity and putting on flesh in order to be seen. In this miraculous act, God reveals His great love for us and at the same time He reveals the only way to be sustained in the fullness of this life is through that same love. Jesus demonstrates this for us. This morning we uncover what it means to receive and abide in the love of God.
Introduction
What is love?
The most frequent verb for “love” (אָהֵב, ahev) in the Old Testament occurs over 200 times in both its noun and verb forms. It refers to the relationship between two people, either a parent and a child (Gen 22:2; 25:28; 37:3) or a husband and a wife (Gen 24:67; 29:18). The Pentateuch also uses the word to describe the relationship between God and the people of Israel. Deuteronomy 6:5 commands the people to “love (אָהֵב, ahev) the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might” (Deut 6:5, compare Deut 10:12; 30:6). The nation manifests their love for God by following the law (Deut 11:1, 13, 22; 19:9; 30:16, 20).
Loyal Love (חֶסֶד, chesed)
The most frequent noun for “love” in the Old Testament, חֶסֶד (chesed), occurs over 250 times in the Hebrew Bible. The term does not have a clear equivalent translation. The KJV translates it as “lovingkindness,” while newer translations use “steadfast love” (ESV) or “loyal love” (LEB). Some translators use “mercy,” following the Septuagint translation (ἔλεος, eleos). In context, “loyal love” (חֶסֶד, chesed) refers to two people or groups of people who have previously formed a relationship. It describes an attitude of loyalty between the two, but it also requires some sort of action (Sakenfeld, The Meaning of Hesed in the Hebrew Bible, 16–21).
When “loyal love” (חֶסֶד, chesed) is used in reference to people, it represents a type of fidelity or loyalty that leads to action. Promises between two people display this relational dynamic most clearly.