Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.25UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.15UNLIKELY
Joy
0.25UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.21UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.83LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.06UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.98LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.59LIKELY
Extraversion
0.61LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.46UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.59LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Doctrinal Bible Church
Pastor-Teacher Bill Wenstrom
Sunday December 4, 2022
Jude Series: Jude 22-23-The Behavior of the Recipients of Jude is being Addressed with Regards to Two Groups of Individuals
Lesson # 42
Jude 22 Be merciful to those who doubt; 23 save others by snatching them from the fire; to others show mercy, mixed with fear—hating even the clothing stained by corrupted flesh.
(NIV)
Many expositors contend that there are three different groups of people who have been influenced by the opponents described in this epistle and as we noted most believe that they are false teachers.
However, as we noted in detail I agree with Herbert Bateman IV that they are actually unregenerate Jewish Zealots.
Bateman lists three groups who have been influenced by these Zealots: (1) people who know Jesus as Messiah and yet wrestle with uncertainties, (2) people who do not know Jesus as Messiah and may yet come to believe in him, and (3) people who do not know Jesus as Messiah and will never believe in him.”
I believe that there are not three groups of individuals who have been influenced by these Zealots.
Rather as we noted in our study of Jude 22-23, there are two different groups of people.
Peter Davids writes “The repetition of ἐλεᾶτε, “be merciful…show mercy” with οὓς δὲ, “others…to others” is surprising if we have three different groups of people.
This likely resumes the previous imperatives and advances the thought to the manner of fulfillment.”
In addition to this, there are several more factors which indicate two groups and not three are being mentioned in Jude 22-23.
First of all, as we noted in Jude 22, the mature believers in the Christian community in Judaea were to exercise divine compassion when interacting with the spiritually immature among them.
Secondly, the contents of Jude 23 reveal that they were to exercise divine-compassion when interacting with the non-Christian.
The referent of the relative pronoun hos (ὅς), “to those” in verse 22 are these spiritually immature Christians who were uncertain as to whether or not these Zealots were wrong to rebel against the Roman and Jewish governmental authorities.
As we noted they were uncertain because they did not yet possess the conviction that Jesus Christ Himself would exercise His divine omnipotence to establish the kingdom of God on earth at His Second Advent.
Also, because they were immature they did not possess the conviction that they were to obey the governmental authorities.
The relative pronoun hos (ὅς) appears twice and in each instance its referent is the non-Christian.
The second time the word is used in relation to the second command in this verse, it has a demonstrative force pointing back to the first time it appears in the first command in the verse.
Therefore, the non-Christian, including those who belonged to the party of the Jewish Zealots, were to be saved from the fire of eternal condemnation and it was their garments which were to be hated because they were defiled by the function of their indwelling old Adamic sin nature.
The reference to “fire” in the participial clause which modifies this first command in Jude 23 is the fire of eternal condemnation, which is indicated by Jude 7, which speaks of fire in relation to eternal condemnation.
Also, fire is used of eternal condemnation by John and the Baptist and Jesus (cf.
Matt.
3:10; 13:40–42; 18:8–9; 25:41; Mark 9:47–48 (cf.
Matt 7:19; Luke 17:29) and the apostles (1 Cor.
3:13; Heb.
10:27; Rev. 20:14–15; cf. 2 Pet 3:7).
Both the Old and New Testaments employ fire as an image for eternal condemnation (Deut.
32:22; Isa.
29:6; 30:27, 30, 33; 33:14; 66:15–16, 24; Joel 2:30; Nah.
1:6; Zeph.
1:18; 3:8; Mal.
4:1; Acts 2:19; 2 Thess.
1:8; 2 Pet.
3:7, 10; Rev. 9:17–18; 16:8; 20:9).
The mature believers in the Christian community were commanded to save the unregenerate by communicating the gospel to them in order that they might be declared justified by the Father through faith in His one and only Son, Jesus Christ.
They are then commanded to exercise compassion towards these same unregenerate individuals with reverence for God by hating even the garments of these individuals which are defiled by the function of their indwelling old Adamic sin nature.
In other words, the mature believers in the Christian community in Judaea would be demonstrating divine compassion by saving these individuals when they communicate the gospel to them.
The second command in Jude 23 is thus epexegetical in that it is explaining in greater detail how the mature Christians in Judaea were to go about saving these people.
Furthermore, the conjunction de (δέ), which introduces this second command, is marking it as presenting a mild contrast with the first command.
The contrast is mild because both commands address the proper conduct of the believers in Judaea when interacting with the non-Christian.
The first is a general command and the second develops the first in greater detail.
Thus, the second command in verse 23 like the first in this verse, addresses the conduct of the mature believers in the Christian community in Judaea when interacting with the non-Christian.
This indicated by the fact that the non-Christian in the judgment of God is defiled because they are sinners by nature and practice whereas the believer in Jesus Christ is sanctified (cf. 1 Cor.
1:2, 30; 6:11; 7:14).
Lastly, the conjunctions μέν … δέ, “on the one hand…on the other hand” in Jude 22-23 form a correlative clause which is uniting the commands to exercise compassion when interacting with the spiritually immature and to exercise compassion when interacting with the non-Christian by saving them by snatching them out of the fire of eternal condemnation.
This correlative clause presents the result of executing the command in Jude 21 which required that the Judaean Christian community make it their top priority of keeping themselves in the state of loving God because of God’s love for them.
Therefore, by executing the three commands in Jude 22-23, the mature believers in this community would be demonstrating the love of God when interacting with the spiritually immature in their community and when interacting with the members of the non-Christian community.
The latter would include the unregenerate Jewish Zealots who were rebelling against the Roman and Jewish governmental authorities because they erroneously believed that attacking the Gentiles, i.e. the Romans would prompt the Messiah to establish the kingdom of God on earth.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9