Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.53LIKELY
Sadness
0.49UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.45UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.44UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.94LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.27UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.17UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.06UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.57LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Realm Distinction
We’ve been tracking the story of Yahweh and his portion, Abraham’s descendents.
Yahweh chose to disinherit the nations at Babel.
He chose to appear to Abraham in visible, human form to initiate a covenant relationship.
He chose to reiterate that covenant with Isaac and Jacob, whom he renamed Israel.
And he chose to deliver Israel from Egypt.
The choices telegraphed theological messages.
Israel existed because Yahweh had supernaturally enabled the birth of Isaac.
They continued to exist because God wanted a people on earth by his own plan and by his own power.
The lesser elohim he had placed over the disinherited nations — particularly those in Egypt at his point of the story - cannot prevent his will.
There is no god like Yahweh.
His goal of making the earth a new Eden will not be overturned.
Before the plagues and the exodus from Egypt, the descendents of Jacob knew God by only reputation and oral storytelling.
Now they were at his mountain, ready to journey to the land he had taken for himself, and for them.
They had the tablets of the law, but that was just a starting point.
Egypt and her gods had been defeated, but the conflict with the gods wand their nations was just beginning.
Israel needed to understand that being God’s portion meant separation from the gods and the nations who stood ready to oppose them.
The concept of realm distinction was fundamental to the supernatural worldview of ancient Israel.
Holiness and Sacred Space
Yahweh is a supernatural being., not a mortal man.
Appearing as a human being was a condescension that enable the lesser minds of mortals to comprehend his presence — and live to tell about it.
Yahweh is so other as to be incomprehensible without the facade of something familiar.
And yet for Israel, his otherness would need to be an everlasting reality, sensed at all times.
The concept of otherness was at the core of Israelite identity.
Otherness is the core of holiness.
The Hebrew vocabulary for holiness means to be set apart or to be distinct.
While the idea has a moral dimension related to conduct, it is not intrinsically about morality.
It is about DISTINCTION.
Israel’s identification with Yahweh be virtue of his covenant with Abraham and the terms of his covenant at Sinai meant that, as Lev.
19:2
summarizes, Israelites were to be set apart as God was set apart.
God’s complete otherness was reinforced in the minds of Israelites through worship and sacrifice.
God was not only the source of Israel’s life - he was life.
God was complete in his perfections.
He was not of earth, a place where there is death, disease and imperfection.
His realm is supernatural; ours is terrestrial.
The space he occupies is sacred and made otherworldly by his presence.
The space we occupy is “profane” or ordinary.
God is the antithesis of ordinary.
Humans must be invited and purified to occupy the same space.
Many laws in the Torah illustrate this worldview and its messaging.
Whether priest or not, make or female, people could be disqualified from sacred space by a variety of activities and conditions.
Examples included sexual activity, bodily emissions, physical handicaps, contact with a dead body, and childbirth.
The logic of such exclusions is simple, yet foreign to our modern clinical minds.
Sexual intercourse, discharges, blood loss and menstruation were not considered unclean out of prudishness.
Rather, the concept was that the body had lost the fluids that contain, create, and sustain life.
That which is not whole and is associated with loss of life cannot enter God’s presence until ritual restoration rectified that status.
The same reasoning is behind the ritually unclean status of those with physical handicaps, infected with a disease, and who have touched a corpse, animal or human.
God’s presence meant life and perfection, not death or defectiveness.
These laws kept the community conscious of God’s otherness.
Regulations
governing the sanctity of God’s dwelling provided concrete object lessons about realm distinction.
The ground that that dwelling encompassed was sacred space in relationship with the people of Israel.
The separateness of the divine realm was reinforced by the laws that allowed or disallowed proximity to God.
These permissions or prohibitions even extended to inanimate objects associated with God and his service.
Even within sacred space there were gradations of holiness or sanctity.
The closer one got to God’s presence, the more holy the ground or the object in his proximity.
The terms that describe the layout of the structure are evidence of this progression.
From the entrance inward was the court, the holy place, and the “most holy place (holy of holies).
The sacred space of the tabernacle got progressively more holy from the entrance to the innermost room.
The progressive holiness zones were also distinguished by the priestly clothing associated with them.
For example, the high priest, the person with permitted access to the holiest place, wore a unique ephod, breastplate and headdress inscribed with “holy to Yahweh.”
The holier the zone, the more costly the animal sacrificed to sanctify the priests when they entered into the presence of God for rituals.
The Tabernacle: Heaven on Earth
That Yahweh dwelled in a tent before the construction of the temple (much later, during the time of Solomon) is important for marking sacred space.
The tabernacle (dwelling) was the place where Yahweh would cause his name - his presence - to dwell.
As the divine abode, the tabernacle was also analogous to Eden.
Like Eden, the tabernacle was cosmic in conception, the place where heaven and earth met, a veritable microcosm of the Edenic creation where God first dwelt on earth.
There are many connections but we will only look at a few of the most obvious.
To begin, the description of the tabernacle as a tent dwelling is significant.
Elsewhere in the biblical world, deities and their councils were considered to live in tents - atop their cosmic mountains and in their lush gardens.
The test of the god or gods was, as with mountains or lush gardens, the place where heaven and earth intersected and where divine degrees were issued.
This was a common cultural idea, perhaps akin to how many people think of church - -church is a place you’d expect to meet God, or where God can be found.
Moses was told to construct the tabernacle and its equipment according to the pattern shown to him by Yahweh on the holy mountain.
The implication is that the tabernacle on earth was to be a copy of the heavenly test in accord with the religious principle as in heaven, so on earth.
the heavenly tent prototype was the heavens themselves.
this kind of language is also whey the earth is referred to this way
God sits above the circle of the earth, in his heavenly tent, on his throne above the waters see
As Eden was the place where humanity experienced the presence of God, so too was the tabernacle.
This was particularly true for the priests, but God’s presence occasionally met Israel’s leaders outside the holy of holiness, the most obvious instance being the glory cloud.
The menorah (lampstand) in the tabernacle is a striking analogy with the tree of life in Eden.
The lampstand was fashioned in the appearance of a tree and was stationed directly outside the holy of holies.
The cherubim inside the holy of holies are also a clear connection to Eden.
The Edenic cherubim stood guard at the dwelling place of God in Eden.
Their position atop the lid to the ark of the covenant is not coincidental.
The innermost sanctum of the tabernacle was the place from which God would govern Israel.
The cherubim form a throne for the invisible God.
Later, when the tent of the most holy place was moved into the temple, tow giant cherubim were installed within for Yahweh’s throne, making the ark his footstool.
Lastly, the entrance to Eden was from the east, which was also the direction from which one entered the tabernacle and later the temples of Israel.
apparently were Eden was.
And the items of the tabernacle and the temples were made of gold, as were the walls, ceiling and floor of the holy of holies in Solomon's temple.
Sacrifice and Israel’s Cosmic Geography
One ritual in particular illustrates realm distinction.
In the context of the Deut 32 worldview, which has the nations under the dominion of lesser gods, the entire Israelite camp was cosmic geography and sacred space.
Israel was identified with Yahweh.
Both the people and the land that Yahweh had determined would beling to the descendents of Abraham were Yahweh’s portion.
Look at the Day of Atonement.. and see the convergence of ideas
Why is one of the goats for Azael?
Who or what is Azazel?
The passage is inexplicable unless you are acquainted with the cosmic geography we have been talking about.
Azazel can be translated “the goat that goes away” which is why some Bibles use scapegoat as a translation.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9