Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.06UNLIKELY
Joy
0.53LIKELY
Sadness
0.19UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.4UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.05UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.97LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.49UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.24UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.57LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.63LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
I will be shortly commencing a series of studies in the Song of Solomon.
It is a wonderful book that teaches us about the relationship between a man and a woman in marriage and also the glorious relationship between Christ and his church.
In preparation I want to look at what marriage truly is.
It is vitally important that we do this as we live in a society where both marriage and the family are under violent attack.
1. God’s Initiative v18
Genesis 2 is an amplification of Genesis 1.
A creation ordinance
Creation Ordinances
Rule
Sabbath
Work
Marriage
a.
Not Good
This is the only place in these opening chapters of the OT where “not good” is used.
God has made us to need someone, even beyond fellowship with Him! Man could not fulfil his role to rule over creation without the companionship of woman, nor could he fulfil the command to multiply and fill the earth.[1]
b.
Helper
Therefore I suggest that we translate Genesis 2:18 as “I will make a power [or strength] corresponding to man.” Freedman even suggests on the basis of later Hebrew that the second word in the Hebrew expression found in this verse should be rendered equal to him.
If this is so, then God makes for the man a woman fully his equal and fully his match.
In this way, the man’s loneliness will be assuaged.[2]
2. The Inadequacy of Animals v19-20
Genesis 2:19–20 (ESV) — 19 Now out of the ground the Lord God had formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them.
And whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name.
20 The man gave names to all livestock and to the birds of the heavens and to every beast of the field.
But for Adam there was not found a helper fit for him.
Adam named all the animals but none were found to suitable to fulfil his God given need.
Here was a man in deeper sympathy with nature than any have been ever since.
H C Leupold[3]
3. The Creation of Woman v21-22
Genesis 2:21–22 (ESV) — 21 So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh.
22 And the rib that the Lord God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man.
The point is that man and woman together share a commonality and partnership observed nowhere else in the created order.
To emphasise this closeness, God actually took a real part from the side of the man as he brought to life for the first time this new creation called woman.[5]
That the woman was made of a rib out of the side of Adam; not made out of his head to rule over him, nor out of his feet to be trampled upon by him, but out of his side to be equal with him, under his arm to be protected, and near his heart to be beloved.
Matthew Henry [6]
4. What a Woman v23
a. Amazing
I wish I could have been there to have seen that first woman.
What a woman she must have been!
...man in his original state must have been a most extraordinary specimen.
Luther thought he must have excelled the animals even in those points where they were strong—power greater than the lion’s or bear’s, eyesight sharper than a lynx’s or eagle’s.
But if that was true of Adam, what are we to say of the companion God now created for him?
Luther thought Eve would have been as strong, fast, clear-sighted, and brilliant as the man, and in addition to that she must have had a beauty and grace that excelled him.
What a woman!
[7]James Boice
The Hebrew words for woman(ishshah) and man (ish) sound alike[8]
b.
Equality
What God did is not without significance.
He teaches by the way he does things.
Woman is a special creation, just like the man.
God is as personally involved in her creation as he was in the creation of man.
He created her from man’s side.
She is not his master; she is not his slave.
She is his equal, one corresponding to him, a companion suitable for him.
The differences between the sexes and the different roles they perform must not be so emphasised as to suggest that the male is essentially different from the female.
They are both human beings.
Neither must we so emphasise the similarities that we fail to appreciate the differences.
There is no biblical or scientific warrant for the unisex mentality.
Philip Eveson [9]
c.
Order
Headship does not necessarily imply inequality.
The God who created human beings, male and female, in his own image has an order within his own being.
There is the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit—three Persons, one God.
Though each is co-equal and co-eternal, the Father has the position of authority and headship so that the Son is sent by the Father and always does the will of the Father.
The Spirit is sent by the Father and the Son and glorifies the Son, who in turn glorifies the Father.
Man and woman together, two distinct persons yet one in nature, reflect something of the relationship that exists between the persons of the Godhead.
Philip Eveson[10]
Conclusion
[1]@book{Utley_2001,
place={Marshall, Texas},
series={Study Guide Commentary Series},
title={How it All Began: Genesis 1–11},
volume={Vol.
1A},
publisher={Bible Lessons International},
author={Utley, Robert James},
year={2001},
pages={48–49},
collection={Study Guide Commentary Series}}
[2]@book{Kaiser_Davids_Bruce_Brauch_1996,
place={Downers Grove, IL},
title={Hard sayings of the Bible},
publisher={InterVarsity},
author={Kaiser, Walter C., Jr. and Davids, Peter H. and Bruce, F. F. and Brauch, Manfred T.},
year={1996},
pages={93–94}}
[3] Leupold, H. C. (1942).
Exposition of Genesis (p.
131).
Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
[4]@book{Boice_1998,
place={Grand Rapids, MI},
title={Genesis: an expositional commentary},
publisher={Baker Books},
author={Boice, James Montgomery},
year={1998},
pages={130–131}}
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9