20230312 Genesis 14: The Spiritual and Ethical Dilemmas of the Believer
Genesis 14
Abram’s warfare symbolically anticipates a later warfare. Abram is a prophet who wages war against the forces of Babylon and her allies. He rescues some people taken captive by Babylonian forces. The New Testament parallels are obvious. Christ is a prophet who wages war against Babylon and her allies. He rescues people who had been taken captive by her, and he uses numerically smaller forces to do so (cf. item 5 above). The parallel is symbolically understood, since Babylon is a figure for the world dominating enterprise of Satan, not only in Revelation 17 but transtemporally.
14:18 Melchizedek king of Salem. The lack of biographical and genealogical particulars for this ruler, whose name meant “righteous king” and who was a king-priest over ancient Jerusalem, allowed for later revelation to use him as a type of Christ (cf. Ps. 110:4; Heb. 7:17, 21). His superior status in Abram’s day is witnessed 1) by the king of Sodom, the first to meet Abram returning in victory, deferring to Melchizedek before continuing with his request (vv. 17, 21) and 2) by Abram, without demur, both accepting a blessing from and also giving a tithe to this priest-king (vv. 19, 20). Cf. Heb. 7:1, 2. priest of God Most High. The use of El Elyon (Sovereign Lord) for God’s name indicated that Melchizedek, who used this title two times (vv. 18, 19), worshiped, served, and represented no Canaanite deity, but the same one whom Abram also called Yahweh El Elyon (v. 22). That this was so is confirmed by the added description, “Possessor of heaven and earth,” being used by both Abram and Melchizedek (vv. 19, 22).
14:20 Who has delivered your enemies into your hand. Credit for victory over a superior military coalition correctly went to the Sovereign Lord (El Elyon) and not to Abram’s prowess (see note at vv. 15, 16). To Melchizedek, and to Abram too, this amounted to true worship of the true God. a tithe. This is the first mention in Scripture of giving 10 percent (cf. 28:22). This 10-percent offering was purely voluntary, and may only have been a tenth of the best, not a tenth of the total (see note on Heb. 7:4). This tenth is not like the required tenths given to Israel in the Mosaic law (see notes on Num. 18:21–28; Deut. 14:22; 26:12).