Momentum building leaders
Sermon • Submitted • Presented
0 ratings
· 1 viewNotes
Transcript
Handout
Momentum Building leaders
Momentum Building leaders
there are two aspects to the growth of the church.
There is the spiritual element, which is made up of evangelism, assimilation, discipleship, fellowship and spiritual ministry.
And there is the organizational aspect of a growing church.
Focusing on the organizational elements should not be the priority over the spiritual elements…However, they should not be ignored.
For the purpose of this training tonight, I will be focusing on the organizational aspect of leaders that build momentum!
Leaders that create a MOVEMENT
Checkpoints or Chokepoints
Checkpoints or Chokepoints
Leadership is necessary. Without organizational structure and positional leadership, chaos reigns.
But what kind of leaders will we be. When our team leads and team members are coming to us with ideas, needing us to make decisions, planning events. Will we be checkpoints or chokepoints.
Why we need checkpoints.
Why we need checkpoints.
Checkpoints ensure excellence
Checkpoints ensure quality
Checkpoints ensure Proper planning
Checkpoints ensure met mile-markers (followed timelines)
How we can be effective checkpoints
How we can be effective checkpoints
Ensuring forms are turned in on time
Ensuring AEPF’s are completed
Why we don’t need choke points
Why we don’t need choke points
Choke points is defined as a point of congestion or blockage
Choke points ensure frustration
Choke points ensure stagnation
How leaders become defective choke points
How leaders become defective choke points
We move beyond excellence to ridiculous
Ignoring and discouraging input and ideas
Not responding to communication
Failing to make decisions
Facilitators or Fascists
Facilitators or Fascists
The difference between the two
The difference between the two
Facilitators ensure collaboration, encourage ideas, empower involvement.
Fascist governments are led by autocratic leaders. When you look at leadership styles, autocratic leaders are leaders that tend to make choices based upon their own ideas alone and do not listen to their team or seek input from others. (it isn’t smoke if it doesn’t come out of my chimney
The outlook of a fascist vs. the outlook of a facilitator
The outlook of a fascist vs. the outlook of a facilitator
My ideas are the best vs. The best ideas come from US
You need to hear from me vs. I want to hear from you
Conform your work to look like mine vs. Encouraging individuality
Developers or Doers
Developers or Doers
Developers are intentional about the development of those they are leading.
Doers are focused on getting the job done
When we talk about scaling an organization, it cannot be done by doers.
Developers
Developers
Developers are intentional about training
Developers are intentional about evaluating
Developers reward risk
Developers reward growth
Developers reward effort
Doers
Doers
Doers are lids for the an organization
No more will get done than they can do
No matter how great of a job they may do, the success ends when they leave.
Doers don’t allow others to pitch in and do what they can’t get to.
Alluring or Allowing
Alluring or Allowing
Alluring speaks of being magnetic, enticing…it speaks of drawing.
Allowing speaks of being permissive.
As leaders we want to create a culture that is magnetic in the following areas:
As leaders we want to create a culture that is magnetic in the following areas:
Ideas - I don’t want to simply be permissive of the ideas of those on my team…I want to be actively pulling ideas from those that I am leading.
Creativity - The personal touch of those that are working with me. It doesn’t need to be done the way that I would do it. I encourage the individuality of your efforts.
Feedback - Great leaders are always looking for ways to improve. They are not threatened by feedback.