Remain in Me - John 15
1. Pruned
to be truly fruitful in communicating the authentic message and life to the inauthentic and hostile world
This verse has also been a stumbling block to some sincere Christians. It appears to be a blanket promise to grant any request that any disciple may make. Really it is a blanket promise to grant any request that an abiding disciple may make. An abiding disciple will ask for only those things that are in harmony with, or subject to, God’s will—like Jesus did. The wishes of abiding disciples are the same as Jesus’ wishes. To ask anything else would make the praying believer a non-abiding disciple.
2. Joy
3. Love
A hymn written by Joseph Scriven (1819–1886) declares,
What a friend we have in Jesus,
All our sins and griefs to bear!
But is there scriptural justification for saying “Jesus is my friend”?
In the OT, Abraham is called God’s friend (2 Chr 20:7; Isa 41:8). But this leads James to say, not that “God was called the friend of Abraham,” but that “He (Abraham) was called the friend of God” (Jas 2:23). Moses, too, is called the friend of God by implication: “The LORD would speak to Moses face to face, as one speaks to a friend” (Exod 33:11 NIV).
But Jesus declares in John 15:14–15, “You are my friends if you do what I command you. No longer do I call you ‘slaves,’ because a slave does not understand what his master is doing. Rather, I have given you the name of ‘friends,’ because I have made known to you everything that I have heard from my Father.” Doesn’t this clearly authorize us to claim that Jesus is our friend?
We should observe, to begin with, that Jesus is not making a blanket affirmation that all his disciples are his friends. “You are my friends, if …” Obedience to Jesus does not create his friendship, but it is a mark and proof of that friendship. Jesus’ central point is that a slave obeys his master’s orders without understanding his master’s motives and plans; he has no intimate knowledge of his master’s purposes. So then, because Jesus did disclose to his disciples a full knowledge of his Father’s counsels (John 1:18; 8:38), they could not any longer be called “slaves.” The only designation appropriate for them in this regard was “friends,” for a friend has the privilege of intimate knowledge that is denied to a slave. No doubt Jesus’ disciples would have called him their friend when introducing him to others, just as he spoke of “our friend Lazarus” (John 11:11).
But there is a radical difference between what was inevitable when Jesus was on earth—a mutual use of the term “friend”—and what is now appropriate with regard to the glorified Lord who shares God’s throne as his plenipotentiary (Rev 22:3). His present titles stress his otherness and unparalleled majesty—he is, for example, the Alpha and Omega (Rev 22:13), just as the Lord God is (Rev 1:8; 21:6), and the bright Morning Star (Rev 22:16)—so that the notion of friendship or comradeship is demeaning when applied to him. It is not that the Father or Jesus is unfriendly, but each remains a supreme Lord to be reverenced and obeyed.
A similar situation applies, I believe, with regard to whether we may call Jesus our brother. On the one hand, during his earthly life, Jesus did not hesitate to refer to his disciples as his brothers (Matt 28:10). And even now Jesus is graciously “not ashamed” to call believers his brothers and sisters (Heb 2:11–12) and be known as the firstborn of them (Rom 8:29). But on the other hand, that does not give us the right to call him our elder brother, which Scripture never does. Indeed, the apostle John describes Jesus as monogenēs (John 1:14, 18), the one and only Son, without siblings. He is the Son (huios) of God (3:18); believers are the children (tekna) of God (1:12).