Untitled Sermon (81)
James adds an additional argument as to why his readers should not flatter the rich and despise the poor
Are not the rich the ones who are consistently guilty of oppression, extortion, and slander
Are they not the ones who slander Jesus’ noble name?
The alternatives are clear. Love is right. Favoritism is sin. James was optimistic; the “if-clause,” if you really keep the royal law, was written in Greek in such a way that an obedient response was anticipated. The “royal law” was given in Leviticus 19:18 and affirmed by Christ (Matt. 22:39): Love your neighbor as yourself. The law is royal or regal (basilikon, from basileus, “king”) because it is decreed by the King of kings, is fit for a king, and is considered the king of laws.
Verses 8 to 13 explain that the person who favors the rich at the expense of the poor is showing favoritism. This person is a lawbreaker, having failed to love his or her neighbor. Anyone who breaks part of the law breaks the whole and is to be judged by that law.
You show partiality: the verb is used only here in the New Testament. It is a verbal form of the noun used in 2:1. It means discrimination, that is “to treat people according to their outward appearance” (TEV).
You commit sin: for James favoritism is contradictory to the command to love and is therefore an act of sin. To show partiality is to commit sin. The verb you commit sin is a strong statement, literally “you are working sin,” indicating that the sinning is deliberate and intentional
Total obedience is the key. One must both habitually speak and act (Gr. pres. tense imper.) as those to be judged by the Law. God’s Law, because of its wise constraints, brings true freedom (cf. 1:25). Disobedience to God’s Law brings bondage