20230924 Genesis 32 - Transformed from the Inside and the Outside
But IVP’s Bible Background Commentary suggests some collateral purposes:
Jacob’s gifts to Esau demonstrate that he is as shrewd as ever. Besides being an attempt to gain Esau’s favor through generosity, the continuous arrival of the herds of animals will wear out any schemes for ambush and deflate any degree of military readiness that Esau might be planning in his encounter with Jacob. Additionally, traveling with the animals will slow Esau down and make his company much noisier. Finally, the plan adds Jacob’s servants to Esau’s retinue—a decided advantage if there is to be fighting.
Jacob may have had these very designs. But, as noted, it is very hard to be sure because the text does not explicitly tell us. We do know that Jacob meant ‘to pacify’ Esau by this serialized livestock transfer (v. 20b). That sounds a good bit like the old, calculating Jacob to me. And yet, surprisingly to me, Calvin is quite ‘easy’ on Jacob. He claims Jacob does not act distrustfully here:
For though by prayer we cast our cares upon God, that we may have peaceful and tranquil minds; yet this security ought not to render us indolent. For the Lord will have all the aids which he affords us applied to use. But the diligence of the pious differs greatly from the restless activity of the world; because the world, relying on its own industry, independently of the blessing of God, does not consider what is right or lawful; moreover it is always in trepidation, and by its bustling, increases more and more its own disquietude. The pious, however, hoping for the success of their labour, only from the mercy of God, apply their minds in seeking out means, for this sole reason, that they may not bury the gifts of God by their own torpor.
How are we to sort this out? I don’t know that we have to do so, at least not in Jacob’s case. We needn’t debate pro-Jacob or anti-Jacob positions here. But we do need to use Jacob’s case as a way of posing our own dilemma and of highlighting our need for discernment. If we were in Jacob’s sandals and had prayed his prayer, would our livestock gift mean we were acting in faith or in place of faith? In our various quandaries we have to ask ourselves if our proposed action expresses faith or contradicts faith. Is our pathway prudence—the way faith should act? Or is it self-reliance, leaning on our own savvy and ingenuity?