Romans 5:1-11 - Part 2 (6-11)
The whole emphasis in this text is that God does not wait for us to become righteous before he brings about our redemption.
In addition to this chronological flow of second by second, minute by minute, hour by hour and year by year, there is also in Greek (cheiros) and in English the distinction between the historical and the historic. Not everything that happens in history is historic; everything that happens in history is historical, but not everything is historic in the sense of having pregnant meaning and radical significance for everything that went before and everything that comes afterwards.
The Bible has this concept of a pregnant moment in the midst of time that changes everything. There is a cheiros, an historic moment that God had planned from the beginning of the world, by which he sends his only-begotten Son into the world to die upon the cross in an historic, once-for-all event. It is an event that can never be repeated, duplicated, surpassed, or even augmented. This is one of the reasons why Protestantism has reacted so negatively to the Roman Catholic celebration of the Mass. For the Roman Catholic Church, the Mass is, in a very technically defined sense, a repetition of the death of Christ, a representation of Christ to the Father. God certainly doesn’t need to be reminded of it, because that atonement, made in the fullness of time, was so rich, so inexhaustible and of such infinite worth that it never needs to be repeated. Nor can we possibly add anything to it by way of merit or value.
The import of the sentence is this, “Most rare, indeed, is such an example to be found among men, that one dies for a just man, though this may sometimes happen: but let this be granted, yet for an ungodly man none will be found willing to die: this is what Christ has done.” Thus it is an illustration, derived from a comparison; for such an example of kindness, as Christ has exhibited towards us, does not exist among men.
“Scarce an instance occurs of self-sacrifice for one merely upright; though for one who makes himself a blessing to society there may be found an example of such noble surrender of life”
A sinner is a transgressor of the law, and so we can say that while we were being actively disobedient to God, while we were in a state of rebellion against God, while we were hostile to God, while we were ignoring God, while we were refusing to submit to him, refusing to love him, refusing to worship him, at that time, while we were at enmity with God, Christ died for us.
Here is a distinction between the present and the future, a distinction between justification and salvation. People say, ‘I was saved the day I believed in Jesus Christ,’ and they use the term salvation as if it were an exact equivalent to justification. But that’s not the case in the New Testament. Justification is one step in the process of salvation. The concept of salvation is used in a very complex way. It is used in the past tense, the imperfect tense, the present tense, the future tense, and so on. There is a sense in which we are saved, we are being saved and we shall be saved, because the full complex of salvation covers the whole of Christian experience. Justification occurs the moment I believe, and at that point I am brought into a state of salvation; but my salvation is still to be finalised, still to be consummated, still to be fully realised through my sanctification and my glorification. I don’t receive my ultimate salvation until I am in heaven. If I am justified, I will certainly receive that ultimate salvation in heaven.