Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.6LIKELY
Sadness
0.54LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.7LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.24UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.89LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.85LIKELY
Extraversion
0.14UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.51LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.74LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
In the previous verses of the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus’ emphasis on how the Scribes and Pharisees had failed to teach the whole and intended council of God.
They had twisted the Scripture and replaced the righteousness of God with their own standards of righteousness.
We saw that they clearly had seen that no one could keep the Law as literally written, at least no fallen man, that is.
To this degree, they were correct.
So Jesus seems to be harsh when He says that the righteousness he expects from us must exceed that of the Pharisees and Scribes.
So is Jesus’ comment that whosoever teaches someone to break the least of the Scripture will be called least.
He does pronounce a blessing on those who teach and DO everything written in the Law.
They will be called great.
The problem is identifying if a single person will be great in the Kingdom of God apart from Jesus who both taught and kept the Word of God.
We think of one of the founders of the United Methodist Church, John Wesley, who believed one could achieve perfect sanctification in this life, that is to do and teach every single commandment with a perfect heart and motivation.
He thought he found a handful after many years but had to soon scratch most of them off the roll of the perfect.
It is important that he never included himself on that list.
We should have learned the lesson by this point that the only way we could stand complete is to stand complete in Jesus Christ and His righteousness.
It is only by our identification with Him that we can stand in the presence of the Father.
In chapter 6, there is a shift in emphasis from the deficiency of the doctrine of the Pharisees to the deficiency of their practice.
The first in theological terms is that the Pharisees who claimed to be orthodox were far from orthodox.
The second which we will be discussing today is called “orthopraxy” or right practice.
There is a third term called “orthopathos” or right passion or motivation.
This was where the Scribes and Pharisees utterly failed.
Pharisaic Judaism was based upon three pillars.
These pillars were alms (charitable giving), prayer, and fasting.
To them, the practice of these things marked one out as a true Jew and assured that they were of the elect of God.
In this they rightly understood that it took more than birthright in the Jewish nation to be saved.
One was not saved or elected merely because they were physically a Jew.
The Pharisees looked at other Jews who did not practice these three pillars as either apostate or ignorant rabble.
The Pharisees also believed in being a witness to the Gentiles as well as wayward Jews.
They crossed land and sea to make proselytes of them.
Part of this witness was their very public profession of their faith.
They dressed and acted the part of witnesses.
They stood out in the crowd.
For this public display of faith, they were admired by other Jews.
But they were also subject to ridicule from others for their stance.
In today’s passage, Jesus is again going to seem harsh on the Scribes and Pharisees.
What could these Scribes and Pharisees be lacking?
Their religion and faith was out in the open.
They were bold participants in the marketplace of ideas.
Their doctrine might have had a few heresies in it some might reason, but whose doctrine is perfect anyway?
Were they at not least modeling the faith and making public testimony of the God of Israel?
Were they not doing what Jesus would later tell His disciples to do in the Great Commission, to cross land and sea and make disciples of the Gentile nations and bringing them into the covenant people of God.
Were they not doing what we Christians are called to do?
However, Jesus seems here to say quite the opposite.
Do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing when giving alms.
Pray in the secrecy of the closet and not in public.
Finally, hide the fact that you are fasting from others.
In other words, it seems to say on the surface not to make a public profession of one’s faith at all.
But if this is so, how could we witness to Jesus Christ and glorify God.? How could we make a public profession of Christ if we remain in the closet of home or church?
We really need to know what to do here.
Jesus seems to be putting us into quite a dilemma.
The answer to the deficiency of the practice of the Scribes and Pharisees lies in the audience they played to.
This problem was that their purpose for practicing their faith publicly was to bring glory to themselves rather than God.
This is nothing less than robbing God of His glory which is idolatry.
There is of course nothing wrong with charitable giving.
The Scripture of which neither jot nor tittle can fail both commends and commands acts of charity.
The Scripture also calls us to pray and there was at least one prescribed fast and voluntary fasts to be undertaken.
And there are many recorded instances of public prayer given in the Scriptures.
Another deficiency of the Pharisees practice lies in the fact that they made the practice of the three pillars of Judaism a litmus test to divide the true from the false Jews.
To them, they saw these as badges or proof of election.
This led to pride and self-righteousness.
Instead of seeing the Scripture pointing to their desperate need of a Savior, it led them to think that they were all right with God so long as they followed the proper procedures listed by the Pharisees themselves.
So when we properly look at what Jesus is addressing here, it should cause us extreme discomfort with our own practice.
For are we not tempted to bring glory to ourselves and not to God?
We even have public prayer closets within the church in which the pious can go to and pray before and after service, although today there are a lot of cobwebs even these rooms as we have left off the practice of prayer altogether.
We want to be able to deduct our charitable giving from our income tax which requires a public account of our charity.
We also are tempted to brag about our charity.
As far as fasting is concerned, what is that today?
Do we take confidence that we are saved because we do good works?
Is our testimony that we made this deal with God and are saved?
Really?
Did we negotiate the terms or dictate the terms of the deal to God?
Is our salvation due to our own stipulations of righteousness and election?
And do we justify this by quoting Scripture, often out of context, to prove that God is obliged to save us because we practice the rules of our own making?
There verses should destroy any idea of “Let’s Make a Deal”, a deal that we control.
The Sermon on the Mount should point out our utter lack of righteousness and need for Jesus as our Savior.
And thank God, a deal has been struck, but this is not a deal of our own making.
It is a deal executed within the Triune God in which Jesus the Son sealed the deal in His perfect righteousness and the shedding of His blood for us on a cross.
This is a deal which must be accepted on God’s terms.
We are not saved because we give charitably, pray, and fast, either publicly or privately.
It is because we believed in our heart that God raised Jesus from the dead and responded in public confession that Jesus is Lord.
Even the faith to believe is God’s gift.
The purpose of election is to prevent human boasting rather than to trumpet human righteousness in the marketplace.
If we do our necessarily public witness to Christ in such a way as to bring attention to what we did rather than what Christ has done for us, we will receive the temporary attention of men who like us will die and stand before Jesus on the Judgment Day.
At the very least, Jesus is saying that the self-proclaimed Christian will be is the least in the Kingdom of Heaven.
But as we already noticed, this probably means more than loss of reward.
It means the loss of heaven itself.
It is certainly not worth taking the risk.
We must remind ourselves again and again that our chief purpose as Christians is to “glorify God and enjoy Him forever.”
Our entire ability to do so is by God’s grace.
It is only by God’s grace that we can give, pray, and fast in an acceptable manner that glorifies God.
Scripture tells us that it is God who completes even these works in you.
Finally we need to remind ourselves that God is the audience of our piety and not men.
We cannot design our worship to please men at all.
This is a great fault in our church today.
Rather than praying how our worship might be acceptable to God, we take polls from sinners or what changes we need to make to church that they might be attracted to it.
How about bikini girls taking up the offering and a keg of beer at the back of the sanctuary?
Would that not attract people to church?
We haven’t quite gone this far yet as far as I know, but things are certainly going in that direction.
We might piously cover our tracks in arranging our worship to our tastes rather than God’s by saying that we are reaching out to sinners.
We are witnessing.
But I wonder if the opposite isn’t true, that the world is witnessing to us and winning the church to the world.
One thing is for certain—We had best do things God’s way and not our own.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9