Quick Shots: Fast Answers to Hard Questions

Is there really no evidence for God’s Existence? (J. Warner Wallace)

Science is the arbiter of truth in our society today.

Science would say there is really no evidence for God

In criminal law there is two types of evidence.

Direct Evidence - Eyewitness Testimony

Indirect Evidence - Everything Else (DNA, fingerprinting, statements, behaviors observed)

Could you make a case for God’s existence from Direct & Indirect evidence?

Eyewitness accounts from the Gospels - Direct Evidence

The Cosmological Argument, The Fine Tuning Argument, The Origin of Life, The Design Argument, The Experience of Mind, The Moral Argument - Indirect Evidence

Information in DNA (Indirect Evidence)

Arranged in a code that is informative.

Information always comes from the mind of an intelligent being.

If I walked into a crime scene and there was a struggle in the crime scene and the suspect killed the victim there blood splattered on the wall where the murder occurred. The splattered pattern I could attribute to the physics of blood and gravity that caused the blood splattered on the wall. I could explain that with NOTHING MORE THAN PHYSICS.

But if I walked into the same room and instead of blood being splattered on the wall it was written in this victim’s blood: “HE DESERVED IT!!!” NOW I’M NOT LOOKING FOR A WHAT I’M LOOKING FOR A WHO!!!

Physics can’t cause that I’m looking for a who because that information that sequence of code we call language that has to come not from physics but from a mind.