Colossians 1:21-29
Results of Reconciliation vs 21-23
Paul at the same time reminds us that this new status is not an end in itself but has a further goal in view: that we who are already “holy” in status should become “holy” in reality
Here, as elsewhere in the New Testament, eschatology is not intended to give us a map of the future but to transform our behavior in accordance with the rule of God so that we live in the present according to the values of that future toward which we are moving.
The Mystery Revealed vs 24-29
The words have caused bewilderment to generations of translators and commentators.7 But in fact they are simply the extension of Paul’s complete eschatological schema. It contains several elements: (1) Christ’s sufferings and death as the eschatological tribulation expected as the antecedent to the new age—Paul’s adaptation, reflected particularly in Rom. 8:18–23, of an older Jewish theme; (2) participation in the death of Christ as itself the means of transition from old age to new (Rom. 6:3–11; 8:18–23 prefaced by 8:17; 2 Cor. 4:10–12 leading into 4:16–5:5; Phil. 3:10–11; Heb. 2:9–10 offers a different model with equivalent effect); and, consequently, (3) Christian existence as a lifelong process in which dying with Christ leads to a share of his final resurrection (Rom. 6:5; Gal. 2:19; 6:14—still nailed to the cross with Christ [note the perfect tenses]; Rom. 6:5; 8:11, 23; Phil. 3:11—resurrection still future; see further my Jesus 326–38).
The word “lack” suggests that Paul thought of a fixed number of tribulations, some of which remained unfulfilled. Perhaps Paul meant that the inauguration of the age of salvation could not be completed until the universal implications of the gospel appeared. All those who contributed to that understanding suffered (e.g., Stephen), and Paul suffered uniquely because he was the apostle to the Gentiles. In a real sense, then, when his work was completed, the implications of the gospel as a message for all people would be clearly known.
Second, Jesus’ afflictions became Paul’s sufferings. Paul carefully distinguished between the two. He suffered in his body (“in my flesh”), and there was a real struggle.