Exodus 15:22-31:18
Behind the Text
Outline
An Inauspicious Journey
Medieval Jewish commentators recognized that verses 32–34 tell of events that took place later on. It was already well established in rabbinic times that the order of the pentatechal narratives does not necessarily conform to chronological sequence. This observation was formulated in two ways: “There is no early and late in the Torah” (ʾein mukdam u-meʾuḥar ba-torah); and “The pericopes of the Torah were not given in order” (loʾ nitnu parshiyoteiha shel torah ʿal ha-seder).
Another interpretation, highly plausible, is that of Rashbam, according to which Moses held up a standard bearing some conspicuous symbol that signified the presence of God in the Israelite camp. The name that Moses gave to the altar after the battle lends support to this explanation. Standards emblazoned with religious insignia are known to have been in military use in the ancient Near East.
A rabbinic comment on this verse reads as follows: “Did the hands of Moses control the course of war? [No! The text] teaches that as long as the Israelites set their sights on High and subjected themselves to their Father in Heaven, they prevailed; otherwise they failed.”
In later Jewish literature, Amalek became a synonym for the implacable enemies of Israel. Haman “the Agagite” was identified with Amalek; Josephus made him a descendant of Amalek.24 Rome, too, was given the code-name Amalek.