Altar’d.Men’s BS: Controversy in Antioch
Scripture
The importance of Antioch
It is fitting that the flare-up between Peter (Cephas) and Paul took place in Antioch because of that city’s place in the history of the early church. According to Acts 11:19–26, the church in Antioch was founded by refugees from Stephen’s martyrdom. These Hellenistic-Jewish believers in Jesus fled far to the north of Jerusalem to this principal city of Syria. There, they began to proclaim the message of Christ—but at first only to their fellow Jews.
Luke reports that, eventually, this first evangelistic effort was joined by newcomers from Cyprus and Cyrene who took the radical step of proclaiming the gospel to Gentiles as well. (Several important manuscripts read “Greeks” instead of “Hellenists” at Acts 9:20. By whichever reading, the context calls for non-Jews to be in mind.) It was in Antioch, therefore, that the lines between Jewish and non-Jewish believers in Jesus first began to blur. Oneness in Christ began to transcend ethnic and cultural barriers. Believers in Jesus could no longer be classified merely as a particular kind of Jew, and therefore the word “Christian” was coined to describe his increasingly diverse band of disciples (Acts 11:26).
Conflict with Paul and Peter
Among life’s everyday experiences, the shared meal is viewed by biblical writers as an especially powerful symbol of how human beings are bound together with one another and with their God. To eat with someone, to share table fellowship, is to foster close association and acquaintance. The result is the establishment of caring and trust, as well as a certain identification by association. Betrayal or unfaithfulness toward another with whom one has shared the table is viewed in the Bible as particularly reprehensible (e.g., Judas’s betrayal of Jesus in Mark 14:17–21). The experience of such fellowship links the participant to God’s saving deeds, both past and future.
Doing the right thing in the face of pressure
Peter’s behavior in this episode opens doors to fruitful study of human nature in the face of peer pressure. Even people who, like Peter, presumably know what they ought to do can shrink from doing it if they stop to calculate what others might think of them. Peter’s personal failure had wider repercussions, as Paul reports that even Barnabas stumbled because of Peter’s actions (v. 13). It shouldn’t surprise us, therefore, that Paul was furious that Peter undermined his work in order to appease James’s people.
Paul’s theological response
For Paul, justification results in a radical transformation of a believer’s life. Paul assures us that this transformation is wholly a work of God, but it is nonetheless a real, observable phenomenon. “Righteousness is new character,” Stagg writes, “not new bookkeeping.”
He has “died to the law” and been “crucified with Christ” so that he might live a renewed and transformed life. The cross penetrates Paul’s life, changing its character and direction so much that he can claim that Christ himself has taken up residence within him, permeating his life, conforming him to Christ’s own image.
Here is a rich mine from which to teach and preach on the nature of salvation. Its source is in Christ alone, it comes to us through faith, and it has implications for how we live. On the one hand, by relativizing our ethnic or cultural identity, it compels us to sit at the table with others who confess Jesus as Lord, no matter how different they might seem. On the other hand, it pulls us ever onward in the direction of Christ-likeness. One need not fall into the overplayed promises of revivalism to confess that an encounter with the crucified and risen Christ is meant to change people from the inside out.
My old self has been crucified with Christ. The use of the perfect tense here signifies that the crucifixion of Paul’s old self with Christ has continued effects in his life. The Gr. prefix (sun [4862, 5250]) of sunestaurēomai [4957, 5365] means “together”; Paul was picturing himself as following his master in a life of self-sacrifice. He viewed himself as copying or imitating Christ (cf. Phil 3:8,10,17; 1 Pet 4:13). Paul did not thereby exalt himself but accepted Christ’s death as his model for life.