Spiritual Equality
‘We must remember that when Paul spoke about women as he did in the letters to the Corinthians, he was writing to the most licentious city in the ancient world, and that in such a place modesty had to be observed and more than observed; and that it is quite unfair to wrest a local ruling from the circumstances in which it was given, and to make it a universal principle
Paul appears to be saying that there is a new view of women in Christianity. They are not to be regarded as an inferior species, as was generally the case in the ancient world. Christ’s new creation makes everything new (2 Cor. 5:17), and distinctions that matter so highly to men, including that between male and female, no longer count (Gal. 3:27–28); Paul will insist on equality in v. 11. He has said that women pray and prophesy in worship (v. 5). For that they need authority and he is saying that their head-covering is their sign of authority. As M. D. Hooker puts it, ‘Far from being a symbol of the woman’s subjection to man, therefore, her head-covering is what Paul calls it—authority: in prayer and prophecy she, like the man, is under the authority of God’
In Judaism women had a very minor place; they were not even counted in the number required for a synagogue (ten males). Christianity gave them a new and significant place, and their head-covering is a mark of their new authority. The differences arising from creation remain; Paul is not trying to obliterate them. But he is clear that Christian women have authority. The idea that the covering of the woman’s head is a sign of subjection to her husband runs into another difficulty. In praying or prophesying she is acting in obedience to God; why should she demonstrate subordination to a man in such an activity? Her head-covering, her authority for praying or prophesying, is the veiling of ‘the glory of man’
Paul feels that when the church is dealing with things that relate to local customs or tradition, it is better to go along with them to the extent that the gospel is not compromised. To do so builds a beginning bridge of contact with the unbelieving world and to fail to do so could be offensive and create a barrier to the gospel of Christ. When a church (or individual Christians within the church) goes out of its way to flout the local customs, it forgets that the purpose of the church is to win persons to Christ and not to tell them about how Christians live. This very commonsense, wise approach to a very special problem is something we can use today.
The problem Paul is addressing is the incurring of social shame through boundary-transgressing hairstyles (Gundry-Volf 1997a:154). Such social shame in the church would damage the missionary outreach to outsiders, who would be offended by the Christian women’s lack of proper social respect (honor, glory) for their husbands or other men and the husbands’ disrespect for their wives or other women when they adopted women’s hairstyles (e.g., letting their hair grow long, v. 14).