Study of Where Sin Abounds for Seminary

Pages to come back to and reference

page 4, 52,

Important notes

the Patriarch were sinners (Page 4)

sinners saved by grace (Page 8)

neat find about the serpent (Page 20)

good clarity on (Page 52)

Thoughts

Helpful mentioning of the how the author handle and treating the word of God in Genesis (Page 13-15)

page 28 needs more study from myself

interesting point of clarity about Eve (Page 31)

good point in the foot notes on page 45 (105)

Quotes

Page 31 & 33 has a great theological teaching that I want to remember

I like the theological statement about creation (Page 48-51) Good but lacking on page 51

Critiques

A possible mis-interpretation of Romans 3:20. If this is true in the introduction there is a danger that the rest of the book will have a misguided presupposition (Page 1)

possible lack of definitions( Page 3)

is the formatting of references helpful or distracting? (Page 6)

introduction utilizes a bundle of reference and critics on people and writes that this book is not set to deny, and therefore the lengthily portion of this book that discusses them goes over my head and seems unusually unhelpful to the argument. I think removing these quotes would have resulted in the same materiel in this work. (Page 7)

possible incorrect formatting of the word “however” Page (11)

should have moved a section to the front of the book (page 13)

Strange God of gods mentioning in a pace that saying is not found. This would not be a book I would give to a mormon (Page 19)

over-the-top English when it is not needed and thus distracts from the argument which I think is great (Page 19-20)

seems to insinuate that Believers can be possessed by the devil (Page 24)Never, mind-He then give another view!

no translation given for Hebrew word leaving me very confused (Page 25,26,29,30,31,32(Latin word),34,45,47)

incorrect formatting with no end-”(Page 30)

archaic wording! through out the work. (Consider Page 32)

Possible incomplete sentence/thought (Page 32,34,)

Possible ignoring a question that could be possed; Did Eve sin apart from Adam and before the eating of the fruit by looking at it? (Page 34)

Why use the word “wrest”? hubris (Page 34,36)

Needs further explaining as a presupposition is added with no argumentation for why that is the case (Page 34)

Apparent contradiction in arguing for the first sin but then saying that Pride and straying from God’s Word is also sins that the Author is mentioning before the “First sin” (Page 36-37 & and then see what is said on Page 31)

missed opportunity about pride after the fall guiding their actions. This is strange especially after the emphasis of pride leading them to din in the first place. If pride was a motive for sin in the first place, the author could then have expanded this contempt out to demonstrate how it is always there. This is a clear failure and continues the strange contradiction before mentioned (Page 40-41) also no mentioning of what “Nakedness” refers to in relation to sin. ***this is a great example for the book review. this is then again missed on page 51. He mentions some good things in 51 but misses the mark.

I disagree with where Bob is going with this in regard to blame shifting. The account was not factual in the sense it was not repentful in their violation to the Command (Page 42)

proto evangelium (Page 44) could speak on how marriage is prior to the fall and curse of the serpent...

also, could have pointed out how all mankind is trying to be that seed outside of Christ and therefore are seed(s) of the Serpent (Page 44)

WHAT!!!! Once!!! God determined a “new plan” may it never be!!!! I am going to hammer hard on this (Page 53)

No end conclusion of this section 1 (Page 54) I wish there had been as I think this leaves the authors though scattered rather than hitting the mark. This might have fixed or concluded thoughts that were not fully clarified.

Section 2

Things to remember and come back too

good things for review

Good comparison from Cain to his parents (Page 60-61)

Critiques

Again, it seems to be that the Author is arguing that the Cross is plan B not plan A (Page 58)

No paragraph formatting on (Page 57-58) I don’t know if this is correct or not.