Agnosticism

Evangelism  •  Sermon  •  Submitted   •  Presented   •  42:25
0 ratings
· 27 views
Files
Notes
Transcript
Handout
Last week we covered the Canonization of the Bible and how we got the Bible we hold in our hands today. We covered misconceptions that have been introduced by the modern mentality of the day to actual irrefutable evidence that exists.
Hebrews 11:1–5 KJV 1900
1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. 2 For by it the elders obtained a good report. 3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. 4 By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh. 5 By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.
Hebrews 11:6 KJV 1900
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Today we are going to cover a belief system that is more prevalent than what we typically think. Agnosticism.
What does the word Agnostic mean?
Hint: Greek words.

Agnosticism comes from two Greek words (a, “no”; gnosis, “knowledge”).

AGNOSTICISM Generally refers to the point of view that remaining noncommittal is preferable on questions where certainty is unattainable. Agnosticism is commonly included as one of the possible beliefs people may hold with reference to the existence of God or gods. For example, atheism refers to the denial of the existence of God or gods. Polytheism indicates belief in a plurality of gods. Pantheism refers to the belief that God and the universe are one. In this context, agnosticism refers to the view that there is not enough evidence to be certain whether or not God exists, so the best option is to suspend judgment and not commit to either the existence or nonexistence of God. This indifferent attitude is sometimes called “practical atheism.”

When was the term coined and by who?
T.H Huxley, he was a biologist and supporter of Darwinism. He coined the term in 1869 during a meeting of the Metaphysical Society in London.
He based the term off his own personal beliefs and therefore many who would follow a similar path or study would follow this same path of thinking.

Agnostic (An). A term invented by Prof. Huxley in 1885 to indicate the mental attitude of those who withhold their assent to whatever is incapable of proof, such as the absolute. In regard to miracles and revelation, agnostics neither dogmatically accept nor reject such matters, but simply say Agnosco—I do not know—they are not capable of proof.

Agnosticism is a philosophical position that asserts the impossibility of knowing or proving certain truth claims, particularly regarding the existence or non-existence of a divine being[1][2]. The term "agnostic," coined by Thomas Huxley in 1869, essentially means "without knowledge"[2][3]. Agnosticism differs from atheism, which claims that God does not exist, by arguing that God's existence cannot be proven or disproven[2]. This position is based on skepticism about human intelligence's capacity to attain assured knowledge, especially in the realm of religious truth[4]. Some view agnosticism as a more intellectually honest form of atheism, as it acknowledges the limitations of human knowledge[2]. However, critics argue that agnosticism can lead to a practical atheism by encouraging people to live as if there were no God, potentially impoverishing and secularizing life[4]. It's worth noting that agnosticism is not a uniform belief system, and surveys have shown that some self-identified agnostics express belief in God or a universal spirit[3].
[1] Christine E. Gudorf, Comparative Religious Ethics: Everyday Decisions for Our Everyday Lives (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2013), 231. [2] Got Questions Ministries, Got Questions? Bible Questions Answered (Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2002–2013). [3] Jessica Tinklenberg deVega and Christine Ortega Gaurkee, All You Want to Know But Didn’t Think You Could Ask: Religions, Cults, and Popular Beliefs (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2012). [4] Samuel Macauley Jackson, ed., The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge (New York; London: Funk & Wagnalls, 1908–1914), 87.
Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, would further expound on the work with his own writings and arguments for Agnosticism.
Kant’s argues that human knowledge is bound by time and space and God goes beyond time and space. So he posses the idea of more agnosticism about God than the question of whether God exists or not.
Agnosticism is generally held by those who want to remain neutral, they do not want any commitment to a system of beliefs.
On the surface level this seems to be the case, but inwardly they are suppressing God and actually choosing to follow a determined path they have already committed themselves.

Agnosticism has always been an element in theology which wishes to observe the limits of divine revelation and to eschew speculation, and to recognize that talk of God contains analogical elements.

Analogy: a comparison of two otherwise unlike things based on resemblance of a particular aspect
What is the major argument that Agnostics will use against Christianity, and religion in general?
There is not enough evidence that God exists.
They will always default to a lack of evidence or a lack in sufficient evidence.
What are some questions here that we could ask an Agnostic?
Is there enough evidence?
What is sufficient evidence?
If given sufficient evidence, would that change your mind?
Let s tackle the first question.
How much evidence is there that Homer wrote the Iliad?
Some would say a overwhelming amount of evidence that he wrote the Iliad.
How many manuscripts of the Iliad exist?
Google will tell you about 1900. But most will agree about 1000. Some will place that lower.
In the movie Case for Christ the movie claimed there were 400 manuscripts at that time.
Would you agree that Homer wrote the Iliad based off this manuscript data?
Yes, I think we can all agree that he wrote the Iliad.
We covered this last week, so we need to know the answer.
How many total Greek New Testament manuscripts exist?
If you asked the average person on the street today, they would probably tell you: “not enough”.
About 5,800.
Based off the number of manuscripts, would you agree that the New Testament was written and by those who claimed to have wrote them?
I would say, yes.
Now, I know you are thinking: How can we tell if the accuracy of those manuscripts are legit and that someone did not just make it all up?
Last week in our discussion of the manuscript data, we discussed the accuracy based on what factor?
Hint: Multiple manuscripts must...
Multiple manuscripts must agree with one another.
What three other areas must the manuscripts align to be considered authentic?
The books must be biblical (NT cannot contradict the OT)
The books must be apostolic (Must be written by an Apostle)
The books must have been widely shared (Verified manuscripts were distributed)
Based off this evidence of the scripture, would you consider this evidence sufficient?
Yes.
How do you think an Agnostic would respond to this argument?
They would want more evidence. Because no matter how much evidence regardless of the sufficiency of that evidence or not, it will never be enough for them to make a commitment.
Since agnostics don’t believe in God or need more sufficient evidence to believe that God exists, there is also the those who already believe that God exists and are willing to accept it as fact.
What is Universalism?

Universalism is the belief that everyone eventually will be saved.

What is the difference between Universalism and Agnosticism?
Many differences. To start, agnostics do not believe there is a way to be absolute that a god exists. Universalism believes that what ever god you believe in will eventually bring you to the same place. So it is a matter of having faith but it does not matter who or what you place your faith.

It was first proposed by the unorthodox church Father, Origen (ca. 185–ca. 254). Origen and universalism in general were condemned as unorthodox at the Fifth Ecumenical Council of Constantinople (A.D. 553). The theology of universalism should be distinguished from the Universalist Church, an extreme anticreedal movement born in colonial America whose rejection of historic Christianity extended far beyond the doctrine of universalism itself. This group was a force in the liberal theologies of nineteenth-century North America and continues to the present.

One of the most influential twentieth-century theologians to embrace universalism was Karl Barth (1886–1968). Philosopher John Hick is a contemporary proponent of the view (see Hick). A small number of otherwise evangelical theologians, such as Clark Pinnock and John Stott, have embraced forms of universalism and/or annihilationism. Most liberal theologians and cults hold to some form of universalism or its cousin, annihilationism, the view that persons who cannot qualify for heaven simply go out of existence. The common principle throughout universalist and annihilationist theologies is that there is no eternal punishment.

This was a heresy that was quickly condemned.
This heresy still exists today. Have you ever heard a person on TV state that they believe a Buddhists and Mormons are all going to heaven?
Maybe you have heard this:
"There couldn't possibly be just one way!"
This is actually a direct Quote from Oprah Winfrey when she was asked about her view of Jesus being the only way to heaven during an interview.
Oprah, who had grown up in a Christian home and was originally named after a person in the bible, Orpah, from the book of Ruth. However the spelling got messed up and thus her name remained Oprah.
This is the idea behind Universalism, that all the people of the world regardless of your ‘god’ or religion, will go to heaven.
All roads lead to Rome.
This is the mentality of those who have accepted universalism.
This is the saying we often hear and has been used in the idea of all religions will lead you to heaven.
What is one major problem with this view?
I’m sure we can all name some big ones.
Not all religions believe there is a heaven.
Where is their ‘Rome’?
Someone stating that all roads lead to Rome is probably not very comforting to a Buddhist.
Buddhists do not want to end up anywhere but completely dead.
Related Media
See more
Related Sermons
See more
Earn an accredited degree from Redemption Seminary with Logos.