The Flood Narrative Part 13: Noah’s Sacrifice and God’s Blessing
Notes
Transcript
Handout
Noah’s Sacrifice and God’s Blessing
Noah’s Sacrifice and God’s Blessing
20 And Noah built an altar to Yahweh, and he took from all the clean animals and from all the clean birds, and offered burnt offerings on the altar. 21 And Yahweh smelled the soothing fragrance, and Yahweh said to himself, “Never again will I curse the ground for the sake of humankind, because the inclination of the heart of humankind is evil from his youth. Nor will I ever again destroy all life as I have done. 22 As long as the earth endures, seed and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night will not cease.
Now he just handled two types of birds. One of them ritually impure, raven, that won't do, but another one of them, the dove is like a standard, form of sacrifice for the poor in the book of Leviticus.
So he took from every pure animal, from every pure bird, and he caused a going-up offering on the altar.
Burnt Offering
Most translations will have the phrase "burnt offerings". That's the standard English translation. And that's not an inaccurate paraphrase, of what the end result is.
But it doesn't quite capture one aspect of what's going on in the Hebrew word. So burnt offering can equally be translated, a going-up offering. The Hebrew word is Olah.
It comes from the Hebrew verb, Alah, which means to ascend or to go up.
So some of the offerings for example, the purification offering, or a peace offering, if you ever have mind to read Leviticus one through seven and it's like a priestly tech manual, and almost all the other offerings, you actually only burn the head, the entrails, the legs, but the meat and the fat, you separate out, the fat belongs to Yahweh, it's precious,
But what you get are all are the cuts of meat. And then what happens is the priests get as their like wage, some of the meat, and then the rest of the meat is given to the offerer, cause you go outside the temple and you cook it and you have a party to celebrate, that either God just forgave me, he's so gracious and good, or to thank him for the harvest, that of which this is you know a sign of his abundance.
But there's one offering where the whole animal is consumed. You don't keep, it's a full surrender offering. And it's the first one in Leviticus one and it's the Olah. It's the going-up. So that's why burnt offering, it's the translation which is kind of weird cause they're all burned, but that's the one that's completely burned. It's actually the greatest sacrifice in terms of it's you're giving up the most, cause you don't get anything back, you don't have a party, you don't get any meat back.
It's a full total surrender.
The priest. And also the Levites
Noah is acting like a priest as he inspects and separates out which animal is pure and which is unpure.
He's acting like a priest.
It's interesting image of Noah, you know who's not only righteous and tamim, but apparently the righteous and the tamim they just like know how to worship God. Its interesting image.
He's not a part of ordained priesthood like the Levites or the Priests.
You know it's kind of like Melchizedek, it's just like this Royal priest who appears outta nowhere, and he just knows how to hold a sacred meal for Yahweh.
So he is all this priest.
The whole point is he starts building an altar, he's acting like a priest. He offers the most valuable. I mean these animals need to go populate the world, but we're gonna take a whole layer of them and kill them.
As in Olah.
And Yahweh smelled, the smell of Nikhoah. Noach makes an, Noach builds a Mizbeach what's the word of offering and he offers a Nikhoah, and then the word for smell is the word Reach.
And Yahweh said to his heart, Remember? Remember the heart. He said it to his heart. Yahweh spoke to his heart once before. He had he was pained in his heart, and he said, and then issued the decree for the flood.
Yahweh said to his heart, I will never again curse the ground on account of humanity. You know why?
Because they're no different, they're no different.
Because the purpose of the heart of humanity is raw, from his youth.
And I will never again strike all life like I just did.
For all the days of the land, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, will not Shabbat.
It's the verb Sabbath.
So cosmic order.
And particularly we're talking about calendar night and day, seasons. This is all he's resetting the snow globe.
So is Yahweh capable of pulling back and allowing the cosmos to collapse in on itself again, is this an option Yahweh has in his toolbox? Obviously.
Is it an option that Yahweh wants to use? Think the beginning he said to his heart, he was pained in his heart. So it's not even something he wants to do, but it's something that rose up before him and that he was compelled to do because of his justice
But now what he's saying is I'll never do that again.
So did the flood narrative bring, just right recompense for the evil and the innocent bloodshed unleashed on the land? Well least within the world view of the narrator. So yes, that was right. So the reason God brought the flood is right here. The purpose of his plans are only raw.
So did that deal with one element of the problem?
But what is the actual root of the problem?
It's the human heart.
And has that changed?
That has not changed.
It's the righteous Noah you know, and what's he about to go do? You know, he's about to go prove God's words, and then him and, and Nimrod and the whole thing. So God knows what he's talking about. But it's so interesting that right here, God's purpose to no longer collapse the cosmos,
the reason why God allowed the cosmos to collapse, is now the reason why he'll never do it again. So humans are not yet changed. So somehow God's strategy for getting these humans to a place where they can rule, male and female in the love and power of God, Genesis one,
God's gonna have to adopt a different strategy than the kill them all strategy when they deserve it.
So this narrative is it's toying, God's mercy and God's justice aren't we?
And would it be right for God to hand humans over, to what they've chose for themselves? Yes it would be, but God has chosen a different tack, because of the recalcitrance of the human heart.
God would be justified to hand humans over to the destruction they have chosen for themselves, but he chose a different way because of the recalcitrance of the human heart. Tim Mackie The Bible Project
Like what is the difference between scenario A, pre-flood, evil humans require the flood. And what's the difference between scenario B evil humans, why not another flood?
What did Noah just do? He just offered a sacrifice.
So this is trying to, now there have been sacrifices already, but this sacrifice is different. It's up on the high place.
Noah being rested on the high place where he builds an altar, and he offers up this the most precious and valuable kind of offering.
And it's as if God says humans haven't changed, but the sacrifice is able to deal with or account for that, what do you call that, that disconnect or that remainder that's left over.
And somehow the wickedness of the human heart can be compensated for, or covered for, when a righteous one intercedes and gives up what is most precious, to show his surrender to God's purpose.
Is There No More Curse on the Ground?
Is There No More Curse on the Ground?
Notice how God’s words in Genesis 8:21b and 8:21d are set in poetic parallelism:
Verse 21b: I will not continue / to curse again the land, / on account of the human
Verse 21d: I will not continue / again to strike all life / as I have done
The words curse/strike are set in poetic parallelism, along with the land/all life. This means that “treating as cursed” has a specific meaning in this context because it is synonymous with the “striking of all life” that took place in the flood.
There are multiple Hebrew words for “curse.” Two of them appear in Genesis 1-11, and there is an important difference between them.
This word curse is really interesting, cause it's different from the word curse that's been all the way through.
1. “To curse” = Hebrew ’arar ( ררא ) means to declare someone’s misfortune/to effect their misfortune.
you're declaring someone's misfortune, or in the case of God, declaring the curse can affect the misfortune, bring it about. God curses the snake, he curses the ground, he never curses the humans, curses the snake and the ground.
14 So the Lord God said to the serpent: Because you have done this, you are cursed more than any livestock and more than any wild animal. You will move on your belly and eat dust all the days of your life.
17 And he said to the man, “Because you listened to your wife and ate from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘Do not eat from it’: The ground is cursed because of you. You will eat from it by means of painful labor all the days of your life. 18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field.
20 The Lord will send against you curses, confusion, and rebuke in everything you do until you are destroyed and quickly perish, because of the wickedness of your actions in abandoning me.
2. “To treat as cursed” = Hebrew qalel ( ללק ) means to treat someone with contempt, to treat them as one who has been cursed.
The verb Qalel, and this means to treat someone like they're under a curse.
To treat them with contempt or shame as if they are cursed.
Do you see the difference?
That actually a really important difference.
5 Then Sarai said to Abram, “You are responsible for my suffering! I put my slave in your arms, and when she saw that she was pregnant, I became contemptible to her. May the Lord judge between me and you.”
So when Hagar gets pregnant, she realize she has now a seat of honor in the family and she looks down on Sarah. She Sarah becomes cursed in her eyes, that's what she says. She treats her as though she's now the one, who's cursed by God.
14 Do not curse the deaf or put a stumbling block in front of the blind, but you are to fear your God; I am the Lord.
And you can just follow it through, don't treat as cursed, the one who is deaf, Leviticus 19 14.
3 “Where is your master’s grandson?” the king asked. “Why, he’s staying in Jerusalem,” Ziba replied to the king, “for he said, ‘Today, the house of Israel will restore my grandfather’s kingdom to me.’ ”
There's this guy who hates David. And so he throws stones at him as he's walking down a hill, and he qalels him with shameful words, treats like he's under a curse.
There are a few places where both words are used together, so the slight difference between them becomes more clear: qalel means to treat someone like they are ’arar, which means to speak about or to act toward them as if they are actually in a cursed state.
2 And I will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make your name great; And so you shall be a blessing; 3 And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.”
and the one who treats you as cursed ( ללק ) I will curse ( ררא ).
28 “You shall not curse God, nor curse a ruler of your people.
Do not treat God as cursed/with contempt ( ללק ) or curse ( ררא ) the ruler of your people.
21 When the Lord smelled the pleasing aroma, he said to himself, “I will never again curse the ground because of human beings, even though the inclination of the human heart is evil from youth onward. And I will never again strike down every living thing as I have done.
So what God says here, in Genesis eight verse twenty one, I will never again treat the land as if it's cursed.
Is it under a curse? Genesis three, yes. But is God going to treat it like the cursed land? No.
What does God do when he brings about this curse or misfortune on the land? What's the parallel line? He strikes life that's to treat as cursed.
So even though humans haven't changed, and even though they're gonna replay all the things, that made me curse the ground, I am not as a rule, going to treat the land as cursed anymore.
He's on a mission to bless.
And again this is all connected to Noah's sacrifice. It's like the archetypal priest, on the high place interceding for the sinful humanity that doesn't even exist yet. Well I guess as kids are, but you know, you get the idea.
“Salvation through the ark does not fulfill the meaning and destiny of Noah’s name (from Gen. 5:29). Rather, Noah is saved in order to worship, to offer the sacrifice that causes God another ‘repenting’ ( םחנ , from 6:8), that is, a ‘rest/comforting’ ( חוחינ ) that turns curse into blessing. Noah’s priestly mediation is the means by which relief from the toil of the curse ground became a reality. For God as well as for humanity, Noah is the consolation for the fall of Adam.” Morales, Michael (2012). The Tabernacle Pre-Figured: Cosmic Mountain Ideology in Genesis and Exodus. Peeters Publishers. 186.
When Noah gets off the boat, his sacrifice marks him as the righteous and blameless intercessor who will devote himself to God. God accepts his sacrifice, but he notes that humanity is no different now than before the flood. This is ironic because Noah and his family are the only people around!
God’s view of the human condition is vindicated by the following narrative when Noah goes on to replay the sin of Adam and Eve by eating the fruit of a garden, getting naked, and involving himself in a shameful act with his son. This disqualifies Noah from being the fully-fledged seed of the woman of Genesis 3:15, but he does advance the portrait of the the needed deliverer.
Noah is one example in the larger pattern leading to the ultimate anointed one who will suffer on behalf of the wicked—a righteous one who will die for the wicked—and make atonement to open the way back to Eden.
The Pattern of the High Place Sacrifice
The Pattern of the High Place Sacrifice
Noah’s sacrifice and the turn of God’s will from judgment to generous blessing is a paradigmatic event in the Hebrew Bible. It sets the template for the unfolding drama as God continues to work with the seed of the woman, which will replay Adam and Eve’s sin, generating conflict that leads to violence and a flood of divine judgment, creating an ultimate crisis of decision. Will humanity surrender what is most precious in order to release divine blessing into the world?
“But it is not simply that an extraordinary act of obedience by a righteous man [Abraham] leads to extraordinary blessing. It is that one man’s obedience climaxes in an act of sacrifice and thus leads to extraordinary blessing ... The faithful obedience of Noah culminating in his sacrifices after the flood changed God’s disposition toward sinful humanity. Similarly Abraham’s obedience guaranteed the future of his descendants and that through them blessing should come to all nations.” Wenham, Gordon (1997). “The Akedah: A Paradigm of Sacrifice.” Journal of Biblical Literature, 116 (3). 102.
15 I will put hostility between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring. He will strike your head, and you will strike his heel.
You can never really move on from Genesis 3:15, 'cause the whole Bible's about it.
So remember God is addressing the snake and what he says is this whole thing began with the snake and the woman with the man standing right there, but it was a conversation between the woman and the snake.
And that sets the tone for that pattern going forward. And so God says, "I will put hostility or enmity between you snake and the woman and between your snake seed and her woman's seed." He, third masculine singular, he will bruise you. So he, that woman's seed will bruise you, not the snake seed, but the snake on the head.
The promise in Genesis 3:15—of a seed of the woman who will triumph over the snake but be struck in the process—sets the outline for a pattern of costly commitment that develops throughout the rest of Genesis and into Exodus.
Abel on the mountain of Eden ( Gen. 4:1-8)
Abel the righteous one gives up his own life Cain it cost him his life
Noah on Mount Ararat ( Gen. 8:20-22)
Noah's sacrifice is similar to Abel's in that he also offers an animal, but it's unlike the Abel story in that it's very obvious, Noah doesn't die. And this is how these parallels work. This is how it works in movies too. When there's a theme working through a movie, there might be parallel moments that a character's in multiple times and everyone builds up your expectations through the pattern, but then the surprise twists come in how each part of the pattern is similar, but then whoa, I didn't see that coming or that's odd, what am I supposed to make of that?
So I see a guy on a high place who's offering an animal sacrifice but Noah doesn't die.
He is going to be taken advantage of by his son later after the sacrifice and that itself is parallel to what happens in the story of Cain and Abel but in a little bit different of a way.
So we're just kinda like, huh, Genesis 3:15 told me that ultimate victory over the snake will come by a seed of the woman who will be struck by the snake while striking it.
So Genesis four fits that mold exactly. Noah's sacrifice does not.
So does God accept Noah's sacrifice?
He's pleased with it. It gives him rest. He smells that Noah smell, from that, the word smell is Noah.
He Noach's the resting smell. He like it, but it is not the ultimate thing that needs to happen.
And I think that's why the poem registers that comment in Genesis 8:21.
21 And Yahweh smelled the soothing fragrance, and Yahweh said to himself, “Never again will I curse the ground for the sake of humankind, because the inclination of the heart of humankind is evil from his youth. Nor will I ever again destroy all life as I have done.
God says, "I will never again treat the ground as cursed on account of the humans for the intent of the human heart is evil from their youth."
In other words, sacrifice is pleasing, but it doesn't solve the ultimate problem. Humans haven't changed, which means we're gonna have to have some more rounds of this go before we get to a more comprehensive solution.
And so I'm not surprised about the next story that happens, which is God saying, "Now the humans wanna kill each other, so let's put some laws into place." Now the humans wanna kill animals, let's put the laws into place and then the story of Noah and Ham and so on.
Abraham and Isaac on Mount Morah ( Gen. 22:1-14)
Noah is the 10th from Adam.
10 generations after Noah is Abram or Abraham.
And is Abraham gonna find himself on a high place having to surrender everything to Yahweh? He is.
After he and his wife have hurt each other and other people to get these two sons, Yahweh is going to test Abram and Sarah precisely by asking for these two sons back. He asks for Ishmael or he works through a set of circumstances to separate Ishmael and Hagar from Abraham and Sarah, because they are oppressing the two of them. But then he also asks for Isaac back. And so this is the whole story in Genesis 22.
And we're told at the beginning of Genesis 22, that this is Abraham's ultimate test, God's testing Abraham, which prepares you the reader beforehand to know this is all about a moment of will Abraham surrender his will and trust this crazy thing that God says that doesn't make any sense much like Noah was tested in the building of the ark.
So when I think about Abraham who's asked to offer up Isaac, how is this similar and how is this different from the Noah and the Abel, Cain and Abel story?
Does God ask for an animal sacrifice first? No, right? Yes, for the life of Abraham's son.
But then what happens is the moment that Abraham is about to do it, God says, "No." He spares the life of his son, and what God provides is a substitute. And that substitute is an animal, right? Yeah, an animal who's caught in a tree about a few yards away. So now the plot thickens, because essentially Abraham did offer up his son. He did, he was about to do it, he was going to do it. So in God's eyes, it was happened. God stopped it and God provided the substitute for the life of the son that belonged to him.
Jacob loses Joseph ( Gen. 37)
Pharaoh loses his son in Egypt ( Exod. 12:29-30)
Moses at Mount Sinai ( Exod. 32)
Moses, this is Exodus 32. So here we're on Mount Sinai and there's a big cloud on top of the mountain. And the people are down worshiping a God that they've made for themselves. And so Moses goes up and he says, "Maybe I can make atonement for what you've done." He hasn't built an altar up there. He just goes up there and offers himself. So no animal, he just offers himself.
With each iteration of the pattern, we see small differences that begin to sketch the portrait of a chosen one who will come and give his own life on behalf of the many.
So here we can just kind of circle all of these key moments, the moment where Abel pays for his sacrifice with his own life, the moment that Abraham gives up his own beloved son, the moment that Moses gives up his own beloved life, this a portrait starts to emerge. And so when you get to the prophet, where people like Jeremiah ends up paying with his own life for communicating the word of Yahweh to his piece, thrown into a pit, and then you get to the book of Isaiah with the famous suffering servant.
And the suffering servant, if you follow the hyperlinks of the poems of the suffering servant, it has vocabulary from all of these stories and imagery. It's as if the suffering servant is a composite silhouette made up of little pieces from all, and there's about five other hilltop moments.
So what Noah's sacrifice does is it does provide a key turning point, but it doesn't fit the Genesis 3:15 full profile, which is what the reader is expecting after Genesis 3:15. And so Noah, like gold star for Noah, but we're not entirely surprised that it doesn't solve everything or that he's gonna replay the sin of Adam and Eve, and that Ham will replay the sin of Cain, and we're not entirely surprised.
21 When the Lord smelled the pleasing aroma, he said to himself, “I will never again curse the ground because of human beings, even though the inclination of the human heart is evil from youth onward. And I will never again strike down every living thing as I have done.
The next thing God says after Noah's sacrifice, is first of all, he says, "I have as an option strict retributive justice." That's God's prerogative as creator. He could pull that move, but that move his intention with his stated purpose to rule the world through humans and he can't do that if there's no humans around. So now we began this other major theme in the Hebrew Bible, which is God continually adopting a non-ideal course of action to accommodate for the ra hearts of humans.
And that theme is just gonna develop in very disturbing ways.
So God is committed to Abraham. And so when Abraham lies and cheats, he has to protect Abraham.
Think of the stories where he lies about his wife and the King of Egypt are being lied in Genesis for they have no clue.
Yet God punishes these Kings because they're putting the seed of the woman in danger.
I don't know if that's ever bothered you, but it ought to, and it seems to bother God that he has to constantly compromise his ultimate ideal of justice to accommodate for the sin.
And it's gonna keep happening through the story that God is so merciful, he gets angry, but he slow to anger, and he will put up with and let his own covenant people draw him into the mess of the human condition.
And so this sacrifice as it were, is addressing both of these.
It's the way that God maintains justice on human evil, but also provides mercy at the same time.
So the flood story is really setting you up for this huge drama within God's own purpose and self as it were.
And in the story of Moses, he invites Moses into that divine tension. I wanna destroy them, but you'd be going back on what you said you were gonna do. And God acknowledges that Moses is right and he changes course just like he does right here in the flood story.
God’s response to Noah’s sacrifice eliminates simplistic notions of God’s wrath or God’s mercy. It’s both, not one or the other, and this drives the drama of the biblical story forward. - Tim Mackie
And so the hilltop sacrifice of Jesus giving up his own life as God becoming the human sacrifice to both cover for human evil and to open the way to mercy and blessing simultaneously.
It really it's the only way this story could ever be solved, and the tension, that tension that's resolved in Jesus, the meaning of the cross wouldn't mean what it means if you hadn't really explored this tension between God's justice and mercy throughout the whole of the Hebrew Bible.
I's easy to ignore one of those themes, God's justice or God's mercy at the expense of the other, and the biblical authors won't let us do that. They force us to hold both together and to see how both are brought together in the cross.
17 And a voice from heaven said, “This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well-pleased.”
When the gospel authors present Jesus' baptism to us, for example in the gospel of Matthew 3, and Jesus comes up to be baptized and there's a cloud from heaven saying, "This is my beloved son, in whom I am well-pleased."
This line is blending together the wording of three biblical texts. This is my son, is from Psalm 2 about the anointed Messiah from the line of David. But that phrase beloved son describes only one other character in the entire Hebrew Bible, and it's Isaac.
And this phrase "in whom I am well pleased" is copy and pasted from the first of the suffering servant poems in the book of Isaiah, "This is my servant in whom I am well-pleased."
So this little line of God's is sending out little threads, activating quilt threads to someone from the line of David who will play the role of Isaac, that is the suffering servant.
And so what's interesting is that Jesus is activating both Isaac, but also that ram in the tree. Both characters illuminate something about who Jesus is and what he's doing.
So the Isaac story, Abraham and Isaac's story was very much on the brain for Jesus and for the apostles.
Bibliography
Bibliography
https://bibleproject.com/classroom/noah-to-abraham
Smith, George (1873). The Chaldean Account of the Deluge (2). Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archaeology. 213-34.
Wenham, Gordon J. Genesis 1-15: word Biblical Commentary, Volume 1. Word Publishing, 1987.
https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/8867/who-were-the-sons-of-god-bene-elohim-in-genesis-62
Heiser, Michael (2017). Reversing Hermon: Enoch, The Watchers, and the Forgotten Mission of Jesus Christ. Defender.
Annus, Amar (2010). “On the Origin of Watchers: A Comparative Study of the Antediluvian Wisdom in Mesopotamian and Jewish Traditions." Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha, Volume 19.4. 277-320.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/jan/01/noahs-ark-was-circular
Tremper Longman III, John H. Walton, et al. The Lost World of the Flood: Mythology, Theology, and the Deluge Debate
Gilgamesh subduing a lion, Louvre museum Darafsh [CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], from Wikimedia Commons
Bible Study for after
Bible Study for after
Here’s a 3-day Bible study to deepen understanding of the material titled "Noah’s Sacrifice and God’s Blessing." This study will guide participants to reflect on Noah's role, sacrifice, and its connection to God’s changing heart, the concept of sacrifice throughout Scripture, and God’s justice and mercy.
---
**Day 1: Understanding Noah’s Sacrifice as a Burnt Offering**
*Passages to Read:* Genesis 8:20-22; Leviticus 1:1-9; Psalm 51:17
*Reflect and Discuss:*
1. **The Meaning of Olah:** The Hebrew word for “burnt offering,” Olah, signifies a “going-up” offering. What do you think it means to offer something fully, as Noah did, without taking anything back? How does this relate to total surrender to God?
2. **Contrast with Other Offerings:** In Leviticus, only part of an offering is burned, while the rest is shared among priests and the offerer. But in a burnt offering, everything is consumed. Why might God value total surrender over partial offerings?
3. **Noah’s Role as a Priest:** Noah selects and offers pure animals, acting as a priest would. Reflect on how Noah’s act of sacrifice foreshadows the role of a priestly intercessor. How does this help us understand Noah’s relationship with God?
*Application Questions:*
- Is there an area in your life where you’re called to a deeper surrender? How might Noah’s example encourage you to trust God with it?
- How might you act as a “priest” in your daily life, offering your time, actions, or words as an act of worship?
---
**Day 2: God’s Mercy, Justice, and Changing Heart**
*Passages to Read:* Genesis 8:21; Genesis 3:15; Romans 3:23-26
*Reflect and Discuss:*
1. **God’s Heart in Genesis 8:21:** In this verse, God “said to His heart” that He would never curse the ground or strike all life again, despite human sinfulness. What does this reveal about the balance between God’s justice and His mercy?
2. **Poetic Parallelism:** In Genesis 8:21, God says He will not curse the ground again nor strike all life. Compare this with the curse in Genesis 3. How does the poetic pairing of “curse” and “strike” deepen our understanding of what the flood accomplished?
3. **The Recalcitrant Human Heart:** Noah’s sacrifice was pleasing to God, but it didn’t change the inherent problem of human sin. How does this foreshadow the need for a different solution in God’s plan?
*Application Questions:*
- Where do you see both justice and mercy in your relationship with God?
- What sacrifices, or acts of surrender, have brought you closer to understanding God’s mercy?
---
**Day 3: The Pattern of Sacrifice and Foreshadowing the Messiah**
*Passages to Read:* Genesis 22:1-14 (Abraham and Isaac); Isaiah 53:1-12; Hebrews 10:1-14
*Reflect and Discuss:*
1. **The Pattern of Sacrifice:** The Bible uses high places and sacrifices as markers of faith and obedience. What parallels do you see between Noah’s offering, Abraham’s near sacrifice of Isaac, and Jesus’ sacrifice?
2. **Sacrificial Themes in Isaiah 53:** How does the imagery of the suffering servant in Isaiah relate to the themes of sacrifice and intercession seen in Noah’s story? What does this passage add to our understanding of God’s “different strategy” in addressing human sin?
3. **Christ as the Fulfillment:** Reflect on Hebrews 10:1-14, where Jesus is presented as the ultimate, final sacrifice. How does Jesus’ sacrifice bring an end to the pattern we see developing from Genesis onward?
*Application Questions:*
- What does Christ’s ultimate sacrifice mean to you in light of these earlier sacrifices?
- How might you respond to God’s generosity by living sacrificially in your own life?
---
**Closing Reflection:**
Noah’s sacrifice is a powerful reminder of full surrender, trust in God, and the beginning of a redemptive pattern pointing toward Jesus. Through each of these sacrifices, God’s mercy and justice are displayed. Consider how you can live as an offering, a “going up” of your own heart to God.