12.8.24 Sermon @ Tulip CC - Hope Found in Rahab’s Redemption
Rahab’s story gives us hope for our eternal future. God uses the broken to complete His plans, offers the passover of His judgement to those who are obedient, and will bring His children to the promised land.
Introduction
Sermon Notes
Notes from Others for Reference
Scriptures
Notes & References
Another interesting fact about Matthew’s genealogy is the inclusion of four Old Testament women: Tamar (Matt. 1:3), Rahab (v. 5), Ruth (v. 5), and Solomon’s mother (v. 6), Bathsheba. All of these women (as well as most of the men) were questionable in some way. Tamar and Rahab were prostitutes (Gen. 38:24; Josh. 2:1), Ruth was a foreigner, a Moabitess (Ruth 1:4), and Bathsheba committed adultery (2 Sam. 11:2–5). Matthew may have included these women in order to emphasize that God’s choices in dealing with people are all of His grace. Perhaps also he included these women in order to put Jewish pride in its place.
When the fifth woman, Mary (Matt. 1:16), was mentioned in the genealogy, an important change occurred. The genealogy consistently repeated, the father of, until it came to Mary. At that point Matthew changed and said of whom was born Jesus. The “of whom” is a feminine relative pronoun (ex hēs), clearly indicating that Jesus was the physical Child of Mary but that Joseph was not His physical father. This miraculous conception and birth are explained in 1:18–25.
Another striking feature of Matthew’s genealogy is his inclusion of women. It was pretty uncommon to include women in genealogies, but not unheard of (cf. 1 Chron 1:32; 2:17–21, 24, 26). However, you would expect them to be exemplary. The inclusion of these particular women is simply scandalous. Tamar was guilty of prostitution and incest (Gen 38:6–30). Rahab was apparently a foreign harlot (Josh 2:1, 3; 6:17, 23, 25; Heb 11:31). Ruth was a foreigner. And Bathsheba was an adulteress (2 Sam 12:24) and perhaps considered a foreigner by her marriage to a Hittite. Each of their stories highlights the faith of a Gentile over against Jewish counterparts: Tamar vs. Judah, Rahab vs. Israelites, Ruth vs. judges generation, and Uriah vs. David.
These gals did not belong in the lineage of the Messiah! Yet, there they are, as a neon reminder of the grace of God. When Mary was accused of being raped (or worse) and ostracized by her family and friends, each of these women could have stood next to her and said, “Honey, I know how you feel.”
At the same time, Matthew describes Mary differently than the others. All five women give birth to a son in the lineage of David. The first four use an identical linguistic structure—“Out of” (ek tēs). With Mary, however, the structure changes to “Out of whom was begotten” (ex hēs egennēthē). It would appear that Matthew is making a subtle statement about the virgin birth of Jesus.
