The Ethic of a Christian pt2- Imago Dei
The crown of God’s handiwork is human life. The narrative marks the prominence of this creative act in several ways: (1) the creation account shows an ascending order of significance with human life as the final, thus pinnacle, creative act; (2) of the creative acts, this is the only one preceded by divine deliberation (“Let us make” in v. 26); (3) this expression replaces the impersonal words spoken in the previous creation acts (e.g., “Let there be,” “Let the earth”); (4) human life alone is created in the “image” of God and has the special assignment to rule over the created order (vv. 26–28); (5) the verb bārāʾ occurs three times in v. 27; (6) the event is given a longer description than previous ones; (7) in v. 27 the chiastic arrangement highlights the emphasis on “image”; and (8) unlike the animals, who are said to have come from the land in v. 24 (though v. 25 makes clear that God created them), mankind is referred to only as a direct creation of God
Mankind is appointed as God’s royal representatives (i.e., sonship) to rule the earth in his place. When sin marked the human family as disobedient children, however, they did not lose the “image” (9:6; 1 Cor 11:7; Jas 3:9); rather, the “glory” of sonship faded. In the New Testament these ideas of image, glory, and sonship are found closely related (e.g., 1 Cor 11:7; 2 Cor 3:18; 4:4, 6; Heb 2:5–10). By the grace of the Creator the new humanity is created in the “image of Christ” (cp. 1 Cor 15:49) and through his perfect obedience achieves life and glory for believers as his adopted children (e.g., Rom 8:17, 30; 9:23; 2 Cor 4:4, 6; Col 3:9–10
Going beyond the original question, Jesus adds a second commandment that is also foundational—Lev 19:18. “The second is like it” probably means that this commandment is of equal importance. Jewish interpreters had long recognized the preeminent value of each of these laws; Jesus apparently was the first to fuse the two and to exalt them above the whole law
Neighbor. For most Jews a neighbor was another Jew, not a Samaritan or a Gentile. The Pharisees (John 7:49) and the Essenes did not even include all Jews (1QS 1:9–10). The teaching of the latter stands in sharp contrast with that of Jesus. The Essenes taught that one was to love all the children of light who are part of the community but to hate the children of darkness who stand outside the community
The term “Samaritan” is in an emphatic position in the sentence. Jesus deliberately chose an outsider, and a hated one at that, for his hero in order to indicate that being a neighbor is not a matter of nationality or race
Jesus indicated that one should worry less about who a neighbor is than about being a good neighbor.
The Lord did not have to wait until the psalmist’s birth to know all about him, for his eyes saw the psalmist even in his embryonic state. All the days of his life were planned and recorded in advance by the Lord, even before he emerged from the womb (cf. Jer 1:5). The verb yāṣar, “plan,” refers to the work of a potter or craftsman in forming something to be used (cf. Isa 45:9; Hab 2:18), and it often describes God’s work of creation (Gen 2:7–8, 19; Isa 44:24; Jer 1:5; Amos 4:13) or planning (2 Kgs 19:25; Isa 46:11; 64:8; Jer 18:11). It indicates that the psalmist’s days were planned by the Lord according to his predetermined divine purpose
