ETB Exodus 22:21-27; Lev. 19:9-10
Understand the Context
If a person adopts the pagan worldview, a number of things follow. First, one comes to believe that it is possible to manipulate the cosmos to satisfy one’s needs and desires. That leads almost inevitably to the idea that one can (and must) manipulate humans for those same ends. When this idea is coupled with the fundamentally low view of humanity that paganism produces, the end result is that the poor, the helpless, and the disadvantaged are where they are because they deserve to be. They are a second (or third) class of humanity who have no right to be treated with respect or care.
These laws reinforced the underlying principles of the Ten Commandments, but they went further by extending them to situations beyond the context of
Explore the Text
The note of the Lord’s personal concern in this matter stands in stark contrast to most of the other ANE law codes where this matter was not even addressed. The alien (stranger) and the foreigner in most ANE societies had no rights and were often oppressed and enslaved.
The Israelites recognized several categories of outsiders, depending on the degree of identification of the alien with the covenant community. The gēr, and perhaps the tôšāḇ as well, tended to represent those aliens who chose voluntarily to identify with Israel as completely as possible, including a commitment to their national deity and their spiritual values. By contrast, the noḵrî / benê nēḵār and the zār were usually those who resided in Israel and/or had political contacts with Israel, but who refused a closer association. Consequently, Israel was able to receive the former legitimately, but acceptance of the latter was forbidden.
Exodus 19:6
Without a legal protector, the position of the widow in Israelite society was precarious; she was often neglected or exploited. Part of the reason for the harsh treatment of widows may have been the common view that widowhood was a reproach from God Himself (
The biblical orphan is usually the child of the widow. There is no clear case where the term implies the loss of both parents. Hence the translation “orphan” instead of “fatherless” is arbitrary (except in
This section focuses on the three basic motivations of Israelite law: to live in the light of saving grace (22:21; 23:9), to live in the light of who the Lord is (22:22–28) and to live in holiness (22:29–31). The general ‘duties to God’ (22:29–31) are preceded by eight verses of care for the disadvantaged and followed by nine verses of care for truth and right. Verses 21–24 apply the lex talionis on a national scale. A nation careless of its disadvantaged people will not be allowed to survive. There are national consequences of provoking divine wrath.
Charging interest was allowable (
The phrase “do not be like a moneylender” is not necessary, but it puts the finger on the agent who might act fairly but not compassionately. Other ancient Near Eastern laws do not legislate compassion.
Apply the Text
The point of the gleaning laws was to compel landowners to leave some food for those who might be hungry. Yes, the landowner “owned” his land; he had a “right” to the produce; but that right of ownership was not absolute. Indeed, it was God who ultimately owned both the land and the produce. And God simply said that part of the produce was to be left for the hungry.
In most modern societies, it would be impractical or impossible to abide by these gleaning laws, but the point is to abide by the principle of the laws: namely, that in any socio-economic system, provision must be made for the poor. And this is not only the responsibility of governments; it is also the responsibility of every citizen. God wanted every Israelite to be as concerned for the poor as He was, and He of course expects the same of Christians today.
