Weary Weakness

A. Desperation and Divine Bread
B. Divine Example
The Jews took Sabbath observance very seriously. Thus when the enemy attacked on the Sabbath in the days of the Maccabees, they let themselves be slaughtered, men, women, and children, rather than break the Sabbath by defending themselves (
The singular for entered seems to mean that David went into the holy place to get the bread (unless the loaves were those taken out of the holy place and not yet eaten by the priests). He then brought it out, and his little band ate it. They were in need and there was no other bread, so they ate the holy loaves. For him fastens the responsibility on David; his men are then joined with him, but Jesus makes it clear that the great David, whom everyone honored, was the principal figure in this breaking of the strict provisions of the law. Jesus goes on to make it clear that the bread belonged to the priests alone, the priests of Aaron’s line. They alone prepared the loaves, set them out in the sanctuary, and consumed them when the time came for removal and replacement. Eating the holy loaves was a priestly prerogative—laymen were not allowed to do it. But the Scripture, the very Scripture on which the Pharisees professed to rely, did not condemn David or his men. David was not breaking the Sabbath; the relevance of what he did was that the need to satisfy hunger overrode a liturgical provision. His men were not starving, just badly in need of food. This makes a powerful argument: if these men’s hunger set aside a divine regulation without blame, how much more should the hunger of Jesus’ disciples set aside a rabbinical rule!
