The Devil's Tests
Matthew 4:1-11
4:1. These verses describe the moral testing of the king. High moral character is essential to effective leadership. We perform much the same testing of people who present themselves for leadership positions. Unfortunately, our culture has lost its bearings in this regard. This is a foreshadowing of our ultimate fall and judgment if we do not repent. But Jesus’ testing here is more of a powerful demonstration of his capacity than an “I-wonder-if-he will-pass” kind of test. God himself has recognized such testing as a necessary part of Messiah’s ministry.
Jesus’ preparation for ministry involved a combination of pleasant experiences (the affirmation at his baptism) and unpleasant experiences (his fasting and temptation). God uses the same pattern in our lives, and we should be surprised at neither great outward blessing nor great trials in our lives. Jesus faced forty days of direct confrontation with the archenemy whom his messianic ministry would destroy. Satan, the adversary, is always seeking to usurp God’s place and oppose God’s will.
One practical implication we may draw from this passage is that temptation itself is not a sin. Jesus was “tempted in every way, just as we are—yet was without sin” (
4:2. It is possible to fast forty days without food, but not without water, especially in an arid, hot climate like the Judean wilderness. The understatement about Jesus’ hunger is intended to show that Jesus fought his battle with a serious handicap but still came out victorious.
4:3–4. Satan’s words in Jesus’ first temptation indicate that Jesus was indeed the Son of God, and Satan acknowledged the fact. This might be better translated, “Since you are the Son of God.” See exactly the same wording used with sarcasm in 27:40. Satan was not questioning the fact of Jesus’ son-ship, but he was tempting him to misuse it.
In this first temptation Satan was tempting Jesus to rely on his own self-provision, rather than on the provision of God. Jesus often insisted he would do nothing of his own will. He came to do the Father’s will only. This would have been a departure from the mission on which the Father had sent him. Jesus would have been exercising improper independence.
Satan’s temptations follow the familiar pattern he used in Eden and which he has used ever since—the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life (
4:5–7. The highest point in Satan’s second temptation refers to the high southeast corner of the temple platform that overlooked the great depth of the Kidron Valley. This was a temptation to be “showy,” to do miraculous works to draw attention.
Again Satan used a conditional statement, If you are the Son of God. Again, he was not challenging Jesus’ sonship, but he was using it as a basis to argue to a false conclusion—that it is appropriate to “force” God into supernatural demonstrations of his faithfulness to intervene for our good. In this temptation Jesus was tempted to exercise improper dependence to “force” divine intervention. That is sin.
Satan, in quoting