1 Peter 3:8-22
‘Finally, all of you, be like-minded, loving towards one another, compassionate and humble [v. 8], not returning evil for evil or reviling for reviling; but on the contrary blessing, for you have been called to such a righteous life in order that by this righteous living you may obtain God’s blessing on your life [v. 9]. For in the Psalms God promises blessings to those who live righteously’ (vv. 10–12).
There is no more fearful thought than that the God of heaven and earth is “against” someone. You do not want God for an enemy! This is a powerful incentive to avoid the doing of “evil” (v. 12); an even more stimulating reason to “do good” (v. 11) is the enjoyment of God’s manifest presence and the grace he supplies to those who humbly submit to his instruction and guidance (cf. James 4:6; 1 Pet. 5:5).
They might be called to endure the worst that anti-Christian prejudice could inflict. But even then they could be assured that their pagan opponents, and, more important, the spiritual powers of evil that stood behind them and directed them, were not outside Christ’s control: they were already defeated, awaiting final punishment. Christ had openly triumphed over them. Here is real comfort and strength for a persecuted church which took very seriously the reality and power of spiritual forces.
To simplify, we should probably understand it in this way: “which (water) now also saves you, (who) are the antitype (of Noah and his family)—(that is) baptism.” In other words, the experience of Noah and his family in the flood is the type of which Peter’s audience and their baptism is the antitype (antitypon). France is especially helpful here:
The essential principle of New Testament typology is that God works according to a regular pattern, so that what he has done in the past, as recorded in the Old Testament, can be expected to find its counterpart in his work in the decisive period of the New Testament. Thus persons, events and institutions of the Old Testament, which in themselves need have no forward reference, are cited as ‘types’, models of corresponding persons, events and institutions in the life of Christ and the Christian church. On this principle, then, … Peter takes the salvation of Noah in the flood as a model of the Christian’s salvation through baptism.
Peter immediately qualifies the sense in which baptism saves us: it is not by the physical action itself, in which dirt is removed from the body. In other words, the physical action of baptism has no intrinsic saving power. There is no mechanical relationship between being immersed in water and being forgiven. The only sense in which baptism saves, says Peter, is insofar as it provides the occasion for an “appeal to God for a good conscience.”
