Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.17UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.12UNLIKELY
Joy
0.55LIKELY
Sadness
0.23UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.71LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.68LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.81LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.15UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.47UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.7LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.12UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Attachments 6
 
 
       I had a dear sister confront me Sunday about her perception of the negative impact of my influence.
Because I take responsibility for my influence and any possible misunderstandings there of, I want to address the situation.
Last Wednesday, I used as an illustration of the subconscious impact of Attachment styles upon us, my irrational dislike of Ford products.
In that illustration, I stated that Ford probably makes a good product, but my emotional experiences, as a child, would not allow me to assess that in an unbiased way.
This person heard me say, “Don’t by Ford’s!” or believes that I have so much influence that people won’t buy Ford products.
If anyone got that from what I said, “Let me apologize and state, ‘Please buy Fords and any other product that you deem good.’”
FORD can also acronymically be “Forever On The Road Driven.”
I apologize, because I take my influence seriously.
Please pass that on to anyone that you know who may have been similarly impacted.
*/On another note, I know that some of you are experiencing some difficulty as we go through this painful section on soul wounds, and you may be asking in protest, “Is this really necessary?”/*
I believe that is a legitimate question.
Let me answer your question by telling you a story.
*Home On The Other Side*
 
A Christian who always had a secret dread of having to pass through the portals of death frequently prayed to be released from this disturbing fear.
Finally one night while walking past a graveyard, he found the deliverance he sought.
Seeing a little girl entering the gate, he inquired, “Don’t you dread crossing the cemetery alone, especially when it is so dark?” “Afraid?” replied the child.
“Oh, no!  My home is on the other side!”  “I see, Lord,” he whispered, “I too need not fear, for the grim ‘valley’ is but a momentary shadow; my blessed Home is just beyond!”
This can also be applied to negative feelings.
We are *not* dredging up negative feelings just to have something to do on a Wednesday nights.
As a matter of fact there is nothing to dredge up.
These states, although transparent to many of us, are very much in the present and operating presently.
\\ I am trying to help all of us deal with emotional states that block our way to intimacy with God, ourselves, and others.
We do not delight in walking through negative emotions, but our home is on the other side.
Once we have become aware of negative emotions and their impact upon us, dealt with the source of those emotions, grieved the more destructive ones, and earn a secure attachment style that has more positive feelings attached to it, we will be able to reach our home or destination of healthy intimacy with God, ourselves, and others.
/(We begin our review tonight on page 46.)/
 
 
Attachment Styles and Our Vulnerability to Soul Wounds
 
       The four attachment styles are secure, ambivalent, avoidant, and disorganized.
So far, we have explained how our attachment styles are formed.
“*/Our personal attachment style creates a template through which we view future relationships./*
*/They also shape whether we avoid attachment injuries—or feel their effects later in our lives./*
Remember, people with a secure attachment style believe they are worthy of love and believe their caregivers are able and willing to meet their emotional needs.
*/Those people are best prepared to avoid or quickly repair the damage inflicted by attachment injuries./*
Those with an insecure attachment style (ambivalent, avoidant, or disorganized) tend to question their self-worth and don’t expect their caregivers to be there for them when they are needed.
*/The insecure attachment style can make them hypersensitive to attachment injuries.
In fact, people with certain insecure attachment styles almost expect to be betrayed and abandoned, because in the past, their support figures have repeatedly let them down./*”[1]
\\ Knowledge Is Power
 
“The rest of the book will show you how you… can acquire the relationship tools that will enrich your attachments and protect you and your loved ones from inflicting—and incurring—soul wounds.
We’ll begin by studying the four attachment styles in greater detail and showing you how you can identify your own personal style.
Then we’ll give you the tools for using your relationship strengths and tempering your injurious tendencies so that your relationship becomes all that you dreamed it could be.”[2]
 
 
4
!! The hardened heart
 
The Avoidant Attachment Style
 
/The ability to trust others is at the heart of intimacy./
–Clinton and sibcy
 
That is a major, major statement.
In many ways, all of our interactions with others boils down to one powerful feeling, “Trust.”
We must heal from broken trust and we must learn how to grant perceptive trust to others, or we are going to have a hard time having a “fully present” relationship with anyone—including Jehovah God!!!
 
/(All right, let’s review the “Comparison of Attachment Styles” chart.)/
| !!!  
!!! Comparison of Attachment Styles
  |
| !!!!!!
Both
| !!!!! Secure Attachment Style
  *Self Dimension* ·        I am worthy of love.
·        I am capable of getting the love and support I need.
*Other Dimension* ·        Others are willing and able to love me.
| Ambivalent Attachment Style  *Self Dimension* ·        I am not worthy of love.
·        I am not capable of getting the love I need without being angry and clingy.
*Other Dimension* ·        Others are capable of meeting my needs but might not do so because of my flaws.
·        Others are trustworthy and reliable but might abandon because of my worthlessness.
| !!!!!! Others
|
| !!!!!! Self
| *Avoidant Attachment Style*  !!!! Self Dimension
 ·        I am worthy of love.
·        I am capable of getting the love and support I need.
*Other Dimension* ·        Others are either unwilling or incapable of loving me.
·        Others are not trustworthy; they are unreliable when it comes to meeting my needs.
| *Disorganized Attachment Style* !!!! Self Dimension
 ·        I am not worthy of love.
·        I am not capable of getting the love I need without being angry and clingy.
*Other Dimension* ·        Others are unable to meet my needs.
·        Others are not trustworthy or reliable.
·        Others are abusive, and I deserve it.[3]
| !!!!!! Neither
|
The Components of a Loving Relationship
 
       “Research confirmed by our own experience, tells us that those who connect lovingly with others are able to
 
·        have an emotional connection with others,
·        disclose private thoughts and feelings, and
·        participate in nonsexual touch.”[4]
/Emotional Connection /(pg.
51)
 
“A wife tells her husband about her difficult day with the children.
Even though she’s frustrated and shares her feelings in harsh tones, her husband is able to sift through the emotions, hear what’s said, and sensitively responds to her immediate needs—without become overly defensive, retreating into his own world, or simply capitulating to the moment.
*/Conversing and relating in this way, showing sensitivity and responsiveness to the feelings expressed by others, creates an emotional connection./*
Such a connection implies understanding and even more, empathy, the ability to see the world through another’s eyes.
As a result there is relational warmth and enjoyment that only comes from knowing others.”[5]
This is what I most often offer to others, but this is something that we all can learn.
/Disclosure of Private Thoughts and Feelings/
 
       “*/Disclosure is the cornerstone of intimacy./*
(We think of it as /in-to-me-see/.)”[6]
*/This makes us vulnerable and we do it with people that we love.
I call it openness./*
Many people are honest, i.e. they will share things with you about themselves, if you ask the right question or happen to hit upon it.
*/But, openness is volunteering important information about one’s self to people that we care about./*
\\        “In contrast, the person with an avoidant attachment style does not enjoy being known or knowing others because it awakens his or her repressed feelings of loss and anger about being known, or emotionally connected, as a child.
Helping those with an avoidant attachment style find the courage to acknowledge these feelings can free them up to face intimate relationships.”[7]
/(Remember, my learned style is avoidant.)/
/Nonsexual Touch/
 
       “It is said that kids need physical touch, on the average of eleven touches per day.
Noted Christian psychiatrist Grace Ketterman believes kids need at least one hundred touches per day!  Touches like high fives, wrestling, handholding, warm hugs, tender caresses, cuddling, and gentle kisses.
It’s parent-child touching, and it’s also part of the warmth and tenderness of a romantic relationship in adults.
/Everyone needs touch!/
       Interestingly enough, this nonsexual touching is linked to the release of oxytocin, a chemical also released during those tender moments when mothers nurse babies.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9