2 Peter 2:1-3
In describing them in this chapter he oscillates between the present and the future tense, as does Paul in a similar context in 1 Timothy 4:1ff. No doubt this is because he sees them as fulfilling the prophecies both of the Old Testament and of Jesus (Deut. 13:2–6; Matt. 24:24, etc.). There is a similar play between the future and present in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 and 7, and 2 Timothy 3:1ff. and 5. There always have been and there always will be false teachers among the people of God.
People translates laos, a word used for the people of God in the LXX as well as in the New Testament. According to the speeches attributed to him in Acts, and to the teaching of 1 Peter as well, Peter claims that the Christians have been incorporated into the true Israel of God; there is no split between the Old Covenant and the New.
False prophets may mean that they falsely claimed to be prophets, or that they prophesied false things; probably both. The men were as untrustworthy as the message. But as Peter calls them ‘false teachers’ not ‘false prophets’ it may be that they made no pretensions to prophecy. Nevertheless three prominent characteristics of false prophets in the Old Testament could apply to them. Unlike true prophets they did not speak with divine authority, their message was one of spurious peace, and they were condemned to be punished by God.
Their teaching was flattery; their ambitions were financial; their lives were dissolute; their conscience was dulled, and their aim was deception
Fulfillment of Jesus’ promise on the Mount of Olives had already begun (Matt. 24:11). With the advent of the “latter days,” Satan has intensified his efforts to lead God’s people astray through false prophets and teachers (1 Tim. 4:1–5; 1 John 2:18–27).
The false teachers did not hide what they were teaching but were probably “covering up the degree to which their teaching differs from the accepted apostolic teaching.”
these false teachers were inviting the swift and cataclysmic judgment of eternal destruction that God would render to all who disobey the gospel.
“follow” (exakoloutheō) means “to accept as authoritative determiner of thought or action.” Peter anticipates his discussion of the false teachers, who follow the error of Balaam (2:15) and entice others to follow their sensuality (2:2). Perhaps the false teachers claimed the apostles were following myths when they taught about the return of Christ and God’s judgment.
“lack of self-constraint which involves one in conduct that violates all bounds of what is socially acceptable.”
Peter may be echoing Isaiah 52:5 (LXX), in which the prophet laments that God’s name is blasphemed among the Gentiles. Paul quotes this same verse in Romans 2:24 to argue that the sinful disobedience of the Jews has brought about a similar blaspheming of God’s name. Here it is the sinful lives of the false teachers leading people to dismiss the way of truth as just another path to self-indulgence.
“Condemnation” refers to God’s judgment of eternal damnation on these false teachers who claim to be believers but in fact are not. God decreed this condemnation “long ago,” but the delay should not be misinterpreted to indicate that their condemnation is “idle.” To amplify this point, Peter adds that “their destruction is not asleep.” As the protector of his people, God does not “slumber nor sleep” (Ps. 121:4). The destructive heresies the false teachers propagate lead to their own eternal destruction, just as the present heavens and earth are preserved for “the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly” (2 Pet. 3:7). God’s delay in bringing final judgment leads some to scoff (3:1–10), concluding that perhaps such judgment is so “asleep” as to never awaken. Rest assured, Peter asserts, that is not the case.
