Week 2 Genesis LG
Thus seven came to symbolize completeness and perfection. God’s work of creation was both complete and perfect, and it was completed in seven days. All of mankind’s existence was related to God’s creative activity. The seven-day week reflected God’s first creative activity. The Sabbath was that day of rest following the workweek, reflective of God’s rest (
Day 1
If we keep in mind the colloquial use of the language, “day” cannot have its common meaning before the sun is created. The very expression “evening and morning” demands the planetary arrangement of our solar system that does not come into existence until the fourth day. On the other hand, “evening and morning” in a literal sense had figurative meaning for the Hebrew reader in Psalm 90, also attributed to Moses. God’s “day” (yôm) is as a thousand years, but human life is like daylight (yôm) that passes by or as a nightwatch, and youth gives way to old age like “evening” overtakes “morning” (90:4–6). Also the seventh day does not have the concluding refrain “evening and morning,” which suggests its continuation for some period and thus its nonliteral nature. Theological significance is attached to this feature by the writer to the Hebrews (4:1–3). As the climactic seventh day of the six-day series, it implies that all six days are nonliteral. The weight of the arguments favors a nonliteral “day,” but definitive answers to the meaning of “day” and the duration of creation remain elusive.
Day 2
Day 3
The vegetation is of two kinds, expressed in general categories: (1) plants producing seed and (2) fruit trees whose fruit possess seeds. Here is the first occurrence of the term “seed” (zeraʿ), which takes on all-important thematic-theological significance in Genesis (e.g., 3:15; 9:9; 12:7). It most often has the metaphorical meaning “offspring” and speaks of the children of an individual or family (e.g., 4:25). The motif of “seed” as family is joined by the recurring rubric tôlĕdôt (“generations”) and points toward the elective promises of God for all Israel through Abraham’s “seed” (e.g., 12:7; 15:5; 22:17–18). Here it is enough to observe that the “seed” of plants and fruit trees is inextricably associated with its “parent,” an assumption that is consequential for understanding the outworking of God’s covenant blessing for the appointed lineage.
The vegetation, like the waters, is given prescribed boundaries: they reproduce “according to their various kinds.” “Kind” (min) is used for broad categories of animals, birds, and fish (e.g., 1:21, 24–25; 6:20; 7:14). Any attempt to correlate “kind” with a modern term, such as “species,” is unwarranted, though the awareness of distinctive “kinds” is closer to a “scientific” description than is found in pagan cosmogonies. Just as “separations” are integral to creation, so are distinctions among living beings as indicated by their “kinds.” Creation and procreation according to “kind” indicates that God has established parameters for creation. But the term is never used of humanity, showing that we are a unique order of creation. Furthermore, ethnic distinctions are incidental to the commonality of the human family.
Day 4 gets a little crazy
The luminaries were given three functions by the Divine command: (a) to separate day from night; (b) to be for signs and for seasons and for days and years; (c) to serve as luminaries and to give light upon the earth. In verses 17–18, all these functions are mentioned again, according to the recognized rule, in similar, but not completely identical, terms
The prophets of Yahweh often condemned worship of the planets, the sun, the moon, and the stars (astral worship; see
In essence, borrowing the language of
Day 5: Filling the Water
The language of 1:26 reflects this idea of a royal figure representing God as his appointed ruler
1. Both men and women are equally included.
2. Divine image bearing is what makes humankind distinct from the rest of earthly creation (i.e., plants and animals). The text of
