Week 3 Genesis LG
Genesis 2
In the Babylonian creation stories the gods are freed from their labors after the creation of humans, who were formed for the sole purpose of serving the deities’ needs. God’s sabbath, however, is not aversion to labor but the celebrative cessation of a completed work, whereby he expresses his mastery over time by sanctifying it. The observance of Sabbath was unique to ancient Israel. Whereas in the Hebrew calendar (and those of other peoples) the days, months, and years were related to the solar and lunar cycles, the Sabbath is not tied to any celestial movement. “The Sabbath thus underlines the fundamental idea of Israelite monotheism: that God is wholly outside of nature.”230
Wait…A new account?
Elohim is appropriate for the majestic portrayal of God as Creator of the universe since it properly indicates omnipotent deity, whereas Yahweh is the name commonly associated with the covenant relationship between deity and his people, Israel
A second play on the words “man” (ʾādām) and “ground” (ʾădāmâ) becomes apparent: man is related to the “ground” by his very constitution (3:19), making him perfectly suited for the task of working the “ground,” which is required for cultivation (2:5, 15). Because of man’s sin, however, his origins also became his destiny
D. Bonhoeffer rightly observed that symbolically the middle of Adam’s world was not himself but life, the very presence of God; the tree of knowledge as a prohibition signifies that man’s limitation as a creature is in the “middle of his existence, not on the edge
The Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh, for example, depicts its hero recovering the “plant” of life, only to lose it to the water serpent
When the garden setting is read against the backdrop of the Mosaic tradition, there are remarkable similarities to Israel’s experience. As has been pointed out by commentators, the two garden trees are comparable to those elements in the tabernacle that represent life and the law of God
Then He took one of his ribs] He did not take the bone alone, as the exegetes usually understand the verse; the hard bone would not have been suitable material for the fashioning of the tender and delicate body of the woman. The meaning of the text is that the Creator took together with the bone also the flesh attached to it, and from the flesh He formed the woman’s flesh, and from the bone her bones (see also the commentary of Abravanel). Proof of this we find in the words of the man (v. 23): This at last is bone of my bones AND FLESH OF MY FLESH.
23–25 The Man said,
“Finally! Bone of my bone,
flesh of my flesh!
Name her Woman
for she was made from Man.”
Monogamous heterosexual marriage was always viewed as the divine norm from the outset of creation
Finally, this “leaving” and “uniting” involves a public declaration in the sight of God. Marriage is not a private matter. It involves a declaration of intention and a redefining of obligations and relationships in a familial and social setting
