Week 5 Genesis LG
Recap
But “knew” in its conjugal sense is limited to chap. 4 in the early history (chaps. 1–11), where it is found three times (4:1, 17, 25; cp. 4:9)
How did the two brothers know that the Lord had regard for Abel and for his offering, but for Cain and his offering he had no regard? According to the Greek translation of Theodotion, ἐνεπύρισεν, fire descended from heaven and consumed Abel’s offering but not Cain’s; a similar explanation is found in late haggadic Midrashim and in a number of medieval commentaries. Others think that the Bible implies that the Lord manifested himself to the two brothers (Skinner, Jacob). Gunkel supposes that the text alludes to a sign that was given in the sacrifices themselves, for instance the appearance of the liver or the like. It is better, however, to understand the verse in accordance with Brock-Utne’s suggestion, op. cit., pp. 210–211, to wit, that after the offerings had been made, the Lord bestowed blessing and fertility upon Abel’s flocks but not upon the field of Cain.
Cain lured Abel into the fields, where he assassinated him. This is reminiscent of crimes stipulated in the later Mosaic period that were punishable by death (
The virus of sin has infected the parent’s children; Adam and Eve do not have to await their own death to experience the devastating effects of their rebellion in the garden. They witness the murder of their youngest and the exile of their firstborn.
Ironically, though Abel never talks in Genesis, his testimony of faith continues to speak, and his voice cries out for revenge against the unrighteous who oppose God’s work among the saints (
It best compares to the mark of divine protection placed on the foreheads of the innocents in Jerusalem in
Why does God preserve the life of this murderer? This is particularly perplexing since Torah requires capital punishment for murder. No substitute for this crime, such as monetary penalty, was acceptable (e.g.,
Lamech is the seventh from Adam in his genealogy, and his children, who instigate major advances in urban life, are listed in the seventh position from Cain. The first alarming evidence of Lamech’s moral decline is his inauguration of polygamy, a dismal departure from the divine norm (2:23–24). Although Genesis does not condemn the patriarchs for their practice of polygamy, it is transparent from Genesis itself that such practices resulted in painful consequences. In Mosaic legislation it was assumed that polygamy produced troubling home life (
