Grace & Truth
The reason for this is that most New Testament scholars do not think it was part of the Gospel of John when it was first written, but was added centuries later.
For example …
• Don Carson,“Despite the best efforts … to prove that this narrative was originally part of John’s Gospel, the evidence is against [them], and modern English versions are right to rule it off from the rest of the text (NIV) or to relegate it to a footnote (RSV).” (The Gospel According to John, 1991, p. 333)
• Leon Morris: “The textual evidence makes it impossible to hold that this section is an authentic part of the Gospel.” (The Gospel According to John, 1971, p. 882)
• Andreas Köstenberger: “This represents overwhelming evidence that the section is non-Johannine.” (John, 2004, p. 246)
Reasons This Section Isn’t Original to John’s Gospel
The evidence goes something like this:
1. The words used and the literary style of section are different from the rest of John’s Gospel.
2. The story is missing from all the Greek manuscripts of John before the fifth century.
3. All the earliest church fathers omit this passage in commenting on John and pass directly from
Carson says, “There is little reason for doubting that the event here described occurred” (The Gospel According to John, p. 333).
