Isaiah Part 4: The Historical Pivot 4.3
Focus: Historical events that serve as a bridge between the Assyrian crisis and the future Babylonian exile, anchoring the prophecies in history. • Weeks 15-16: Chapters 36–39 - Sennacherib and Hezekiah ◦ Discuss the account of Sennacherib's invasion and God's deliverance (Chs 36-37), resolving the Assyrian crisis that dominated the first half. ◦ Cover Hezekiah's illness and his interaction with Babylonian envoys (Chs 38-39), which anticipates the Babylonian crisis that shadows the second half. This section serves as a "structural pivot" or "border-crossing" for the whole book.
This kind of reliance upon, and delight in, human power and glory is exactly what the first half Isaiah is warning us against. Hezekiah is glorying in the abundance of his palace, his great fortune and abundance. But the message of Isaiah is: Only in trust in God is there abundance (ch. 35).
This is not to say that Hezekiah had to turn the Babylonian envoys out in the street or ignore them. But look at Jesus for a model of how to handle people in power interested in you.
Calvin is perhaps typical here. He understands that Hezekiah is being submissive and repentant when he confesses that God’s word is good. Furthermore, Calvin believes that it is a consciousness of God’s ultimate grace that permits Hezekiah to receive this harsh word without railing. However, this position is called into serious question by the ensuing statement, “For there will be peace and stability in my days.” While it may be that Hezekiah is humbly thankful for God’s grace in not bringing the deserved punishment upon him immediately, it is hard to avoid the implication that the real reason for his saying that God’s word is good is merely the very human relief that he is not going to be destroyed. Whether his descendants are to be consumed does not seem to affect him. Furthermore, his reaction was quite different when his own demise was imminent (38:3).
Hezekiah is not the promised “child”; he is not infallible. Judah’s hope rests in One who is yet to come. To be sure, Hezekiah was the demonstration that God can be trusted. But he is also the demonstration that our trust can no more be in good human beings than in bad ones. Our trust is in God alone.
Through two sets of historical incidents (chs. 7–12; 36–39), which bracket a didactic section (chs. 13–35), it is made plain that God alone is trustworthy. There is nothing else—especially not human glory—to which we can turn. However, all of this raises again the larger questions posed at the beginning of the book. How can a sinful, congenitally distrustful people, nay, race, become the servants of God? That he is trustworthy is eminently clear. But to get human beings to trust him is another matter entirely, as ch. 39 brings into sharp focus. If trust in God is the basis for servanthood, what will motivate us to trust in him? Beyond this, what of God’s holy character and human sinfulness? How shall these be reconciled? Are they ultimately irreconcilable? Must the conflict be ignored? Or is there some resolution to the problem? When all is said and done, while chs. 7–39 provide the groundwork for the solution to the problem raised in chs. 1–5, the problem still remains: how can sinful, rebellious Israel become holy, submissive Israel? Trust God? Yes, but how? Chs. 40–66 exist to provide the answer to that question.
