Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.16UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.52LIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.53LIKELY
Sadness
0.52LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.62LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.05UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.72LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.57LIKELY
Extraversion
0.19UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.51LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.54LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Genesis 27:
There’s a bit of back story missing from these events.
[Explain how Jacob acquired Esau’s birth right, and Esau is now trying to steal it back.]
Most interesting of all, though, is the way gender norms are present in this interaction
Esau - Hairy, outdoorsy, works with his hands, a REAL MAN(tm) is his father’s favorite.
So much so that Isaac is ready to give him what rightly belongs to Jacob.
Jacob - smooth skinned.
Stays at home and cooks (not a manly thing to do).
Is his mother’s favorite.
So much so that Rebekah is ready to deceive her husband to help Jacob get what’s coming to him.
Assumptions about what makes for a real man are so tightly woven into the fabric of this story, they’re impossible to ignore.
It’s not just their personalities.
It extends to the way the two brothers operate in this story.
Esau goes out hunting, prepared to make something of himself on his own.
Like a man.
Jacob instead resorts to trickery and cunning - which are women’s tactics - and lets his mother do much of his work for him.
When Jacob’s womanly behavior results in his receiving the birth right and Esau being left with nothing but a bowl of soup - appropriate, no? - their natures again take hold.
Esau does what comes naturally to him, setting out to take it back by force - he’s ready to kill Jacob if he has to.
Jacob, too, does what comes naturally to him, and runs away.
Which brings us to the part of the story that surely would have offended the tribes of shepherds and hunters who first heard it.
God shows up and blesses one of the brothers.
But it’s not hairy, burly, hot-headed Esau, who handles his business and his problems like a REAL MAN.
It’s that scheming, conniving, cowardly, womanly Jacob.
God appears to him and makes the same promise that he made first to Abraham, and then to Isaac: I’m giving you and your descendants this land.
You will become a great nation and your offspring will be too many to count.
I have chosen you to be the father of my people.
God is not interested in Esau’s potent masculinity.
There are no Divine standards for what makes a real man.
What God wants is someone who actively pursues God’s blessing, and refuses to give it up for any reason.
Jacob fits that bill.
Esau does not.
Although their friends and neighbors probably all agree that Esau is the better man, it is Jacob who finds favor with God, because instead of seeking to fit others’ mold, he seizes the gifts God has given him and uses them to chase after God.
We like to think we live in a more enlightened society than did Jacob and Esau.
Perhaps we do, but the same toxic form of masculinity which blinded Esau to God’s promises is certainly alive and well today.
We continue to judge men favorably for exhibiting traits of “manliness,” and criticize women for the same.
Perhaps it’s time we learned the lesson God is teaching us through the story of Jacob and Esau: The true measure of a person is not determined by how well the fit a prescribed gender role, but by how fiercely they chase after the blessings God has to offer.
When it comes to that standard, how do you measure up?
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9