Announcement of John the Baptist Part IV
Let’s Recap
Zacharias’ Unbelief ()
A trance-like event where a person sees or understands a communication from a supernatural being.
You would think that the presence of an angel and the announcement of God’s Word would encourage Zacharias’ faith, but they did not. WHYInstead of looking to God by faith, the priest looked at himself and his wife and decided that the birth of a son was impossible. He wanted some assurance beyond the plain word of Gabriel, God’s messenger, perhaps a sign from God.
You would think that the presence of an angel and the announcement of God’s Word would encourage Zacharias’ faith, but they did not. Instead of looking to God by faith, the priest looked at himself and his wife and decided that the birth of a son was impossible. He wanted some assurance beyond the plain word of Gabriel, God’s messenger, perhaps a sign from God.
but while he was convinced generally that God is faithful, he was cunningly drawn by the craft and wiles of Satan to draw a wicked distinction. It is all the more necessary for us to keep diligent watch: for which of us shall be secure against the snares of the devil, when we learn that a man so eminently holy, who had all his life maintained strict watchfulness over himself, was overtaken by them?
WHATThis, of course, was unbelief, and unbelief is something God does not accept. Zacharias was really questioning God’s ability to fulfill His own Word!
This, of course, was unbelief, and unbelief is something God does not accept. Zacharias was really questioning God’s ability to fulfill His own Word!
Faith is blessed, but unbelief is judged; and Zacharias was struck dumb (and possibly deaf, Luke 1:62) until the Word was fulfilled. “I believed, and therefore have I spoken” (2 Cor. 4:13). Zacharias did not believe; therefore he could not speak.
if the words only are considered, either all were equally to blame, or Zacharias did nothing wrong. But as the actions and words of men must be judged from the state of the heart, we ought rather to abide by the judgment of God, to whom the hidden secrets of the heart are naked and opened, (Heb. 4:13.)
Unquestionably, the Lord beheld in Zacharias something worse than his words may bear, and therefore his anger was kindled against him for throwing back with distrust the promised favour.
We have no right, indeed, to lay down a law to God which would not leave him free to punish in one the fault which he pardons in others.
WHYAbraham did the same; and yet his faith is so highly applauded that Paul declares, he “considered not his own body now dead, neither yet the deadness of Sarah’s womb,” (Rom. 4:19,) but unhesitatingly relied on the truth and power of God. Zacharias inquires how, or by what proof, he might arrive at certainty. But Gideon was not blamed for twice asking a sign, (Judges 6:17, 37, 39.) Nay more, we are shortly after this informed of Mary’s objection, How shall this be, since I know not a man? (ver. 34,) which the angel passes over as if it contained nothing wrong. How comes it then that God punishes Zacharias so severely, as if he had been guilty of a very heinous sin? I do acknowledge that, if the words only are considered, either all were equally to blame, or Zacharias did nothing wrong. But as the actions and words of men must be judged from the state of the heart, we ought rather to abide by the judgment of God, to whom the hidden secrets of the heart are naked and opened, (Heb. 4:13.)
But it is very evident that the case of Zacharias was widely different from that of Abraham, or Gideon, or Mary. This does not appear in the words; and therefore the knowledge of it must be left to God, whose eyes pierce the depths of the heart.
An exception is Zechariah’s muteness (Luke 1:20, 22) which served as a sign of the truthfulness of Gabriel’s message as well as a punishment for Zechariah’s unbelief.
Zechariah’s muteness (Luke 1:20, 22) which served as a sign of the truthfulness of Gabriel’s message as well as a punishment for Zechariah’s unbelief.
God made Ezekiel mute (Ezek. 3:26) in response to Israel’s failure to listen to his message.
The psalmist considered muteness an appropriate punishment for liars (Ps. 31:18).
An exception is Zechariah’s muteness (Luke 1:20, 22) which served as a sign of the truthfulness of Gabriel’s message as well as a punishment for Zechariah’s unbelief.
Be assured, your unbelief cannot stop God’s plans. My words will come true.
A sign in the Old Testament was often associated with a confirming observable phenomenon which accompanied a word of prophecy. For the next nine months Zechariah’s attempts to speak would prove the reality of Gabriel’s message.
Zechariah’s incense offering took too long. People outside quit praying and began worrying. Where is he? Do we need to do something to rescue him? What could have happened?
People outside quit praying and began worrying. Where is he? Do we need to do something to rescue him? What could have happened?
Zacharias had tarried in the temple longer than usual. This leads to the supposition that something uncommon has happened to him.
The Talmud tells us that even the high priest did not tarry long in the holy of holies on the Day of Atonement. The same feeling of holy awe would induce the ministering priest of the day to perform his functions with no unnecessary delay, and to leave as soon as possible the holy phace.
Meanwhile, the people were waiting for Zechariah and WHATwondering why he stayed so long in the temple.’ They expected the priest’s prayers to last a certain length of time, but too much time had passed and they were becoming apprehensive.
WHATThe order of Luke’s words is unusual for he says the people realised Zechariah had seen a vision before he made signs to them. The words seem to suggest that the people realised immediately. As soon as they saw his face they knew he had seen a vision. Perhaps as Zechariah walked out of the temple, he reflected the light of Gabriel’s countenance, and the people knew he had been in the presence of a heavenly messenger.
The order of Luke’s words is unusual for he says the people realised Zechariah had seen a vision before he made signs to them. The words seem to suggest that the people realised immediately. As soon as they saw his face they knew he had seen a vision. Perhaps as Zechariah walked out of the temple, he reflected the light of Gabriel’s countenance, and the people knew he had been in the presence of a heavenly messenger.
We know that, in the old days of the desert wanderings, the children of Israel could not bear to look on the face of Moses when he came down from the mount after dwelling for a brief space in the light of the glory of the Eternal. Zacharias had been face to face with one whose blessed lot it was to stand for ever in the presence of God. We may well suppose that there lingered on the old man’s face, as he left the sanctuary, something which told the beholder of the presence just left.
If we do only what we feel inclined to do, some of us would do nothing for ever and ever.
Zechariah was overwhelmed. He could not take in this angelic announcement. Too old for this to happen, he needed a sign that he was not hallucinating. He acted like Gideon of old (Judg. 6).
Definition
A phenomenon that is perceived to indicate something else, but especially something about future events.
A trance-like event where a person sees or understands a communication from a supernatural being.
Elizabeth’s Relief ()
WHYThe reason why Zacharias doubted was, that, stopping at the ordinary course of nature, he ascribed less than he ought to have done to the power of God. They take a narrow and disparaging view of the works of God, who believe that he will do no more than nature holds out to be probable, as if his hand were limited to our senses or confined to earthly means. But it belongs to faith to believe that more can be done than carnal reason admits. Zacharias had no hesitation with regard to its being the voice of God, but as he looked too exclusively at the world, an indirect doubt arose in his mind if what he had heard would really happen. In that respect he did no slight injury to God, for he went so far as to reason with himself, whether God, who had undoubtedly spoken to him, should be regarded as worthy of credit.