Andrew the Apostle
Andrew
There are three stages in the call of Andrew to the apostleship. The first is described in
Andrew was a native of Bethsaida on the northern shore of Galilee (
Acts 1:13
Andrew first appears in the NT as a disciple of John the Baptist (
It is probable that he was crucified in Achaia. The Synoptic Gospels say little about him, but in John he is shown as the first home missionary (1:42) and the first foreign missionary (12:21–22). Of the former, William Temple wrote, ‘Perhaps it is as great a service to the Church as ever any man did’ (Readings in St John’s Gospel, p. 29).
It is noteworthy that Andrew thrice brings others to Christ, (1) Peter; (2) the lad with the loaves; and (3) certain Greeks. These incidents may be regarded as a key to his character.
According to tradition, Andrew was martyred at Patrae in Achaia by crucifixion on an X-shaped cross. According to Eusebius, Andrew’s field of labor was Scythia, the region north of the Black Sea. For this reason he became the patron saint of Russia. He is also considered the patron saint of Scotland.
The scene of the Baptist’s ministry was partly in the wilderness of Southern Judaea and partly in the Jordan valley. Two locations are mentioned, Bethany or Bethabara (
The unusual array of dates with which Luke marks the beginning of John’s ministry (
He was heralded by John the Baptist, who is introduced in verse 6: “There was a man sent from God whose name was John.”
“There was” might better be translated “there came,” using the verb (egeneto) that in verse 3 described creation (“was made”). This may carry a small bit of that force and describe John as created for this very purpose. He was part of the new creation. In the same way that God was the source of the light, he was the source for the witness. The Baptist was “sent from God” as his official envoy to prepare for the arrival of the Word, whom we now know is Jesus the Christ. He is the first of the “sent ones,” a semi-technical description of a shaliach or (sent) ambassador to represent God and his ultimate Sent One, Jesus.
The fundamental note in the message of John was the announcement of the near approach of the Messianic age. But while he announced himself as the herald voice preparing the way of the Lord, and because of this the expectant multitudes crowded to hear his word, his view of the nature of the kingdom was probably quite at variance with that of his hearers. Instead of the expected day of deliverance from the foreign oppressor, it was to be a day of judgment for Israel. It meant good for the penitent, but destruction for the ungodly. “He will gather his wheat into the garner, but the chaff he will burn up with … fire” (
The Baptist’s work was twofold. In his preaching he warned the nation of the true character of the new kingdom as a reign of righteousness, and by his call to repentance and baptism he prepared at least a few hearts for a sympathetic response to the call and teaching of Jesus. He also formally announced and bore frequent personal testimony to Jesus as the Messiah
John understood that his baptism was a preparation for the Messianic baptism anticipated by the prophets, who saw that for a true cleansing the nation must wait until God should open in Israel a fountain for cleansing (
We may say, then, that as a “baptism of repentance” it meant a renunciation of the past life; as a cleansing it symbolized the forgiveness of sins (
Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world! Every word here is emphatic, and precious beyond all expression. “THE LAMB” here, beyond all doubt, points to the death of Christ, and the sacrificial character of that death. The offering of a lamb every morning and evening, and of two on the morning and evening of every Sabbath day, throughout all the ages of the Jewish economy, had furnished such a language on this subject as to those who heard these words of the Baptist could need no explanation, however the truth thus expressed might startle them. But in calling Jesus “the Lamb,” and “the Lamb of God,” he held Him up as the one ‘God-ordained, God-gifted, God-accepted’ sacrificial offering. If, however, there could remain a doubt whether this was what the words were designed to convey, the explanation which follows would set it at rest—“Which taketh away the sin of the world.” The word [αἴρων] here used, and the corresponding Hebrew word [נא] signify both ‘taking up’ and ‘taking away.’ Applied to sin, they mean to ‘be chargeable with the guilt of it’ (
It was fitting that the one who called men to repentance and the beginning of a self-denying life should show renunciation and self-denial in his own life. But there is no evidence in his teaching that he required such asceticism of those who accepted his baptism.
4. His Message
35. He was a burning and a shining light [ὁ λύχνος ὁ καιόμενος καὶ φαίνων]—literally, ‘the burning and shining lamp,’ or ‘torch:’—q. d., ‘the great light of his day.’ Christ is never called by the humble word here applied to John—a light-bearer—studiously used to distinguish him from his Master, but ever The Light [τὸ φῶς] in the most absolute sense.
That John’s work was extensive and his influence lasting is shown by the fact that 20 years afterward Paul found in far-off Ephesus certain disciples, including Apollos, the learned Alexandrian Jew, who knew no other baptism than that of John (
Jesus was no less frank in His appreciation of John. If praise may be measured by the worth of the one by whose lips it is spoken, then no man ever received such praise as he who was called by Jesus a shining light (
This is “evangelism explosion” at its best—each one seeks one. One of the two disciples who comes to Jesus is now named: Andrew the brother of Simon, who also becomes one of the Twelve (
20. And—or, ‘Now’ [δὲ] there were certain Greeks [Ἕλληνες]—not Grecian Jews [Ἑλληνισταὶ] but Greek or Gentile proselytes to the Jewish faith, who were wont to attend the annual festivals, and particularly this primary one—the Passover. 21. The same came therefore to Philip, which was of—or ‘from’ [ἀπὸ] Bethsaida. Possibly they came from the same quarter. and desired—‘requested’ or ‘prayed’ him, saying, Sir, we would see Jesus—certainly with far higher objects than Zaccheus (
The scene begins with “some Greeks” wanting to see Jesus. Some have thought these to be Greek-speaking Jews from the diaspora (those who lived in lands outside Palestine), but the term (Ellēnes) refers to non-Jews. This means these were Gentiles, proselytes to Judaism, or God-fearers—Gentiles who are attracted to Judaism and have begun to worship Yahweh. - Osborne
Andrew speaks up in verse 8, pointing out a young boy in the crowd with “five small barley loaves and two small fish.” Barley loaves were coarse, the food of the poor, and the fish were either dried or pickled fish or perhaps a fish paste to give the bread some flavor. Apparently, few others had brought much food, for he added, “How far will they go among so many?” The detail of the barley loaves may well echo the Elisha miracle, with its multiplication of twenty barley loaves. If so, Jesus is being depicted as the greater Elisha. - Osborne
