Public Discussion With Michael Brawner
Refutation of Once Saved, Always Saved
Passages That Refute Once Saved, Always Saved
3:12–13. Builders must also show caution because God will reward church leaders according to the work they accomplish. Because Paul spoke of any man, his words apply to every believer. But they form a direct warning to church leadership.
Church leaders can build upon the foundation of Christ’s gospel in two different ways. On the one hand, they can use gold, silver, and costly stones. These materials will withstand the fire of God’s scrutiny that will test the quality of each man’s work. On the other hand, they can build with wood, hay or straw. Such materials will not withstand the fire of divine judgment.
Paul said that the Day (the day of final judgment) would bring … to light the nature of each leader’s work so that his work would be shown for what it was. So, all Christian leaders should pay careful attention to what they bring to the church. Although the true nature of their work may remain hidden for a while, it will be revealed one day for all to see.
By this argument, Paul called the leaders and participants of the Corinthian divisions to account. He asserted that the trouble they caused would detract from their eternal rewards. He also encouraged them to reaffirm the gospel so they would gain greater rewards on the day of judgment.
3:14–15. Paul further explained the two possible outcomes for church leaders. If a leader’s work survives the fire of God’s judgment, he will receive his reward. God promises great rewards to those who serve him faithfully (Matt. 10:41–42; Rev. 11:18). But if a leader’s work is burned up by divine judgment, the true believer himself will be saved, but only as one escaping through the flames of a burning house. Judgment on church leaders is more severe than on ordinary believers (Jas. 3:1). For this reason, leaders must lead the people of God very carefully.
But it is not the Corinthians themselves who are under scrutiny. Rather, the work of those who have led them, or more accurately, “built” them, is being tested by fire. While the six building materials are probably listed on a “scale of descending value,”42 Paul’s point is simply that some endure in fire (gold, silver, costly stones), while others are consumed (wood, hay, straw).43 If the former are worthy of the foundation, the latter are not. Whether a worker’s task be primarily evangelistic or pastoral, both must be in keeping with the character of the foundation stone, who is Christ. As Paul demonstrates throughout chapters 1–4, the cross is the key both to the initial establishment and ongoing moral renewal of the church. Any doctrine of the cross that treats it only as the entry point into the Christian life is seriously deficient. The mention of three unsuitable materials recalls the ominous warning of v. 10b. “Careless” building resorts to such inferior supplies. And Paul is not talking here just about himself and Apollos. A more general application is signaled with the words, if anyone builds. As the next verse shows, care should be taken when building, because a most searching inspection process will certainly be undertaken at some point.
3:13 A number of terms indicate the eschatological nature of this Day of Judgment. The verbs “to become (apparent),” “to bring it to light,” “to reveal,” and “to test (with fire)” are all regularly used of the final, climactic event of human history.44 The timing of that judgment is mentioned in 4:5: it will happen “when the Lord comes.” This heaping up of synonyms for the same event of examination leaves the inescapable impression that there will be no doubt about the assessment. No trace of indistinctness will be left, and no one will think a retrial necessary. The work of Christian leaders will be shown for what it is. As Thiselton puts it: “Together these terms carry the sonority and weight of what in English we might think of as an apocalyptic epiphany: a universal disclosure in which all hitherto protective veils of ambiguity and hoping-for-the-best (or, equally, fearing-for-the-worst) are removed in a definitive, cosmic act in the public domain.”45 The fact that Paul can speak of the Day with no further explanation indicates the central position it must have occupied in his preaching and teaching, an event he labeled more fully in 1:8 as “the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.”
Seeing that we are not privy to human motivations and unable to gauge long-term effects, our judgments about Christian work will always be open to correction. “But God pronounces a definitive verdict at the last judgment which cannot be revised, for all factors have been taken into account in a total context.”46 Paul’s words provoke fear in those who will be so judged, and humility in the Corinthians who had presumed to make judgments themselves ahead of time. This is not to say that we can never know the character of a leader’s work. But we must always remember that such judgments ultimately belong to God. As Paul can say at another point to the Corinthians: “What we are is plain to God, and I hope it is also plain to your conscience” (2 Cor. 5:11).47
The image of a fire ravaging a group of buildings and fully consuming everything save only the most durable materials would have resonated with the Corinthians. Corinth had been destroyed by the Romans in 146 B.C. and its re-founding in 44 B.C. by Julius Caesar probably meant that some buildings in Paul’s day were a patchwork of new and old materials. A mixture of building materials was regularly used in the construction of Mediterranean cities, whose dry climate made fire an ever-present danger. “Great fires” have raged in cities across the centuries to devastating effect, from Rome in A.D. 64 to London in 1666, Chicago in 1871, and San Francisco in 1906. The image is readily comprehended and evokes appropriate alarm. The fire will test the quality of each person’s work, or “what kind of work48 each has done.” Only those Christian ministers who worked with “gold, silver and costly stones” will have anything to show for their labors.
3:14–15 Unfortunately, exactly which criteria determine whether a person’s work survives the flames are not spelled out in the passage. How do you tell the difference between “gold, silver and precious stones” and “wood, hay and straw” when it comes to building “God’s temple”? To answer this question, commentators tend to read in what they think is important about Christian ministry.49 However, as ever, context is our best guide. Three directions suggest themselves, one from the previous sections of the letter and two from chapter 4.
Although rarely noticed, strictly speaking, the judgment Paul envisages here is not of himself and other gospel workers, but only of the latter. In vv. 10–11 Paul speaks confidently of having successfully laid the foundation, which is Jesus Christ, as “a wise builder” in Corinth. It is only those who “build on this foundation” (3:12)50 whose “quality of work” (3:13) is in question: “their work will be shown for what it is” (3:13). Paul believes that his “foundational” work is up to standard. But this is not mere presumption on his part. In 1:18–3:4 he has already engaged in a searching evaluation of his work and whether or not he has “emptied the cross of its power” (1:17b) and given people “human wisdom” or “God’s power” on which to rest their faith (2:5). He did not “preach the gospel with wisdom and eloquence” (1:17), and he does not declare “the wisdom of this age,” but rather “God’s wisdom” (2:6–7). The foundation he laid was “Jesus Christ and him crucified” (2:2), and in a manner appropriate to the message (2:1–4). If we wonder which criteria Paul has in mind when describing the judgment of Christian prophets and teachers, we need look no further than the values Paul espouses and exemplifies in chapters 1–2. To spell it out, building materials that will be burned up are those in keeping with human wisdom instead of the wisdom of God, which is the fullness of the message of the cross.
The second and third criteria of judgment are mentioned in chapter 4. 1 Corinthians 4:4–5 makes many of the same points as 3:13–15 about God’s exclusive prerogative to judge his workers, the thoroughness of that judgment, and the promise of rewards. The new element is the news that on the Day of Judgment the Lord Jesus “will expose the motives of people’s hearts” (4:5). Disturbingly, then, God will consider not only what Christian workers said and did in their attempts to build up God’s people, but why they behaved in this way. On reflection, this is not unrelated to the first criterion. As we noticed earlier, the “human wisdom” Paul so thoroughly avoids, and God so utterly condemned at the cross (1:18–20), involves not only displays of human brilliance and a message of human adequacy but also the values of self-reliance and self-promotion. In a nutshell, Paul teaches that God will judge Christian workers on the single measure of their avoidance of human wisdom and adherence to the wisdom of the cross as they go about their work. Thus, to conform to “the wisdom of the world” (1:20) in Christian ministry is not only to empty the cross of Christ of its power (1:17) and to encourage a misplaced faith (2:5), but it also leads to the minister’s forfeiting a reward from God (3:8, 14). It is to prove not to be “faithful” to the Master (4:4). Much is at stake for building and worker alike.
But this reward of which Paul speaks, in what does it consist? Verse 15 confirms that Paul is not speaking of salvation as the reward in question, for the builder who suffers loss will nonetheless “himself”51 be saved. The verb “to suffer loss” does not mean “to punish” but to be “deprived of something.”52 The issue then is not reward or punishment, heaven or hell, but reward or no reward. It is the builder’s “work” (3:13) that will be burned up, not the builder himself. As Fee states, 1 Corinthians 3:14–15 is not “a soteriological statement.”53 The picture is of someone escaping from a burning building just in time, “saved by the skin of their teeth.” It is hardly flattering or reassuring, and Paul does not present it as in any way normative or acceptable, but it does not undermine Paul’s notion elsewhere that believers are saved by grace and not by works (e.g., Eph. 2:8–10). Paul has every confidence that all Christians, those who have been given “grace in Christ Jesus,” will be “blameless” on the day of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1:8; cf. Rom. 5:1; 8:1). 1 Corinthians 3:12–15 functions as a warning to those who lead God’s people to “build with care” (3:10), not only for the sake of the church but for their own sake.
The word reward could be translated “wages, pay, salary,” the main concept being “closely bound up with that of an employer’s assessment of the value of the work.”54 As Thiselton notes, the notion of a reward for workers “intensifies the point that Paul and Apollos are responsible to God, their employer, for judgments about their success or failure, not the community.”55 Some who read this passage, anxious to avoid any compromise of the doctrine of justification by grace through faith, urge that the reward of which Paul speaks is the satisfaction of work done with God’s help, “by the grace of God” (3:10), as Paul puts it. An authentic ministry is its own reward. The “wise builder” who “builds with care” derives pleasure from serving God well and from watching the church being built up.
While this may be true, it can hardly be Paul’s point since, as v. 13 indicates, the final outcome of a builder’s work is hidden until “the day” brings it “to light.” The reward can only be an eschatological “prize” (1 Cor. 9:24–27; cf. Phil. 3:14). Whatever its precise nature, its essence is “praise from God” (4:5). We may compare Jesus’ promise in the parables of the Bags of Gold in Matthew and the Ten Minas in Luke: “well done, good and faithful servant!… Come and share your master’s happiness” (Matt. 25:21, 23; cf. Luke 19:17). In both cases the reward for faithful service is the master’s pleasure and his confidence, which leads to a further entrusting of responsibility.
Still more to the point, one cannot judge the quality of the work of another builder: others are “either doing that which will last or that which will perish,” and only time and the day of judgment will determine this.67 It is telling that even work which someone genuinely builds upon the foundation may still turn out to be of no permanent value.
As a builder whose building, not the foundation, is consumed by fire, escapes, but with the loss of his work [ALFORD]; as the shipwrecked merchant, though he has lost his merchandise, is saved, though having to pass through the waves [BENGEL]; Mal 3:1, 2; 4:1, give the key to explain the imagery.
The wording of 3:14 makes it very clear that Paul recognizes the fact that all or part of one’s efforts in the kingdom of God may not survive.4 It is Paul’s conviction that clearly some of the converts will survive. These would be represented by the images of gold, silver, and costly stones. The second half of 3:14 affirms what Paul had already mentioned in 3:8, namely that he and Apollos will receive a reward from God for their efforts. In neither of these cases does Paul make clear what the reward is. Christians have often speculated about degrees of reward and punishment from God at judgment day, but there is no specific information in either of these verses to indicate what the reward is. Some have suggested that it is the satisfaction of seeing one’s converts receive eternal life. Others have suggested that it is the satisfaction of seeing one’s work for God withstand the judgment day. One thing that is very clear in this context is that Paul’s idea of reward here has nothing to do with financial remuneration. Paul is not concerned here with making affirmations about physical blessings or compensation that comes with success in God’s work.
3:15 If it is burned up, he will suffer loss; he himself will be saved, but only as one escaping through the flames.
Paul begins this verse by acknowledging that the work, namely some of the converts of Christian workers, may be burned up in God’s eschatological fire.5 When this happens, Paul says, the worker himself will not be lost because his converts are lost. Even though it is very clear that Paul affirms that the Christian worker will be saved, it is not as easy to understand his idea when he says, “only as one escaping through the flames.” This phrase has received various interpretations throughout church history. As early as the third century A.D., this text was understood to be scriptural proof for the concept of purgatory.6 Others have understood this imagery to be saying that even though one’s life and doctrine have been unacceptable to God, these impurities will all be burned away at judgment day. This view is represented, for example, by John Calvin in his commentary where he deals with this verse. Calvin says,
there is no doubt that Paul is speaking of those who, while always retaining the foundation, mix hay with gold, stubble with silver, wood with precious stones. In other words, they build on Christ, but because of the weakness of the flesh, they give way to some human viewpoint, or through ignorance they turn aside to some extent from the strict purity of the Word of God.… Paul says that men like that can be saved but on this condition. If the Lord wipes off their ignorance and purifies them from all uncleanness. And that is what the phrase “as if by fire” means.7
After giving his interpretation of this issue Calvin comments, “I am sure that my interpretation will satisfy all of sound judgment.” Even though the position of the Roman Catholic church (which advocates purgatory) as well as the position advocated by John Calvin has had many supporters, neither of these seems to take as seriously as they should the immediate context and metaphorical imagery of chapter 3.
Perhaps the best interpretation of this admittedly difficult phrase is that found in the Greek Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature by Walter Bauer.8 In his lexical notes on the Greek word for fire (πῦρ, pyr), he makes the following comments about this verse. “Of the Christian worker who has built poorly in the congregation, it is said, he will be saved as through the fire, that is, like a person who must pass through a wall of fire to escape from a burning house.” Bauer goes on to give examples of this prepositional phrase “through the fire” from ancient Greek literature, both pagan and Jewish. If this is correct, then the following would be Paul’s point in this highly symbolic and metaphorical affirmation. Paul would be saying that there is no doubt about the salvation of the Christian worker himself and that the best way to explain the salvation of the Christian worker, given the limitations of the metaphorical language which Paul has already established, is to say that he will come out of this burning building as one breaking through a building that is on fire.