Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.12UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.21UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.57LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.71LIKELY
Confident
0.44UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.96LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.47UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.16UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.03UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.51LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The Term Inerrancy Is a Poor Term
Too precise
The term inerrancy is not used in the Bible itself
Scholars who have used this term have defined it clearly for over 100 years.
No other word has been proposed which says it as clearly what we want to affirm when we want to talk about the total truthfulness in language.
We Have no Inerrant Manuscripts; therefore, talk about an inerrant Bible is Misleading.
Inerrancy has always been claimed for the first or original copies of the biblical documents.
Yet none of these survive: we have only copies of copies of what Mose, Paul, or Peter wrote.
For over 99% of the words we know what the original manuscripts said.
Textual variants - different words in different ancient copies of the same verse
The Study of textual variants has not left us in confusion about what the original manuscripts said.
For most practical purposes current texts are the same as the original manuscripts.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9