Who is Christ

Life of Peter   •  Sermon  •  Submitted
0 ratings
· 21 views
Notes
Transcript
Sermon Tone Analysis
A
D
F
J
S
Emotion
A
C
T
Language
O
C
E
A
E
Social
View more →

Who Do You Say I am ?

Matthew 16:15 KJV 1900
He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
matt 16.
We will all have to answer that question.
Many questions will be asked but his one is the most important.
Questions at the border: Is that your son?
The question would be answered by Peter?
Do you identify Christ as:
A good teacher
A miracle worker
A prophet

of Caesarea Philippi—It lay at the foot of Mount Lebanon, near the sources of the Jordan, in the territory of Dan, and at the northeast extremity of Palestine. It was originally called Panium (from a cavern in its neighborhood dedicated to the god Pan) and Paneas. Philip, the tetrarch, the only good son of Herod the Great, in whose dominions Paneas lay, having beautified and enlarged it, changed its name to Caesarea, in honor of the Roman emperor, and added Philippi after his own name, to distinguish it from the other Caesarea (Ac 10:1) on the northeast coast of the Mediterranean Sea. [JOSEPHUS, Antiquities, 15.10.3; 18.2.1]. This quiet and distant retreat Jesus appears to have sought with the view of talking over with the Twelve the fruit of His past labors, and breaking to them for the first time the sad intelligence of His approaching death.

of Caesarea Philippi—It lay at the foot of Mount Lebanon, near the sources of the Jordan, in the territory of Dan, and at the northeast extremity of Palestine.
It was originally called Panium (from a cavern in its neighborhood dedicated to the god Pan) and Paneas.
Philip, the tetrarch, the only good son of Herod the Great, in whose dominions Paneas lay, having beautified and enlarged it, changed its name to Caesarea, in honor of the Roman emperor, and added Philippi after his own name, to distinguish it from the other Caesarea () on the northeast coast of the Mediterranean Sea. [JOSEPHUS, Antiquities, 15.10.3; 18.2.1].
This quiet and distant retreat Jesus appears to have sought with the view of talking over with the Twelve the fruit of His past labors, and breaking to them for the first time the sad intelligence of His approaching death.
It was a pagan place where child sacrifices were performed. The God of this world was obvious.
Sometimes need to escape the bubble we live in and see what it would be like is God is totally removed
In cert picture here - Caesarea Phillippi
Our culture says God is dead
50 million abortions in 73
Open pornography in NYC
Children having children
Drug use at highest level ever
in some cities 80% of a children are born w/o a dad
Foster care is busting at the seems
Broad and Olney - Philadelphia - 1992

I What Do They Say 16:13-14

Believer’s Bible Commentary A. Peter’s Great Confession (16:13–20)

16:13, 14 Caesarea Philippi was about twenty-five miles north of the Sea of Galilee and five miles east of the Jordan. When Jesus came to the surrounding villages (Mark 8:27), an incident generally recognized as the apex of His teaching ministry occurred. Up to this time He had been leading His disciples to a true apprehension of His Person. Having succeeded in this, He now turns His face resolutely to go to the cross.

He began by asking His disciples what men were saying as to His identity. The replies ran the gamut from John the Baptist, to Elijah, to Jeremiah, to one of the other prophets. To the average person He was one among many. Good but not the Best. Great but not the Greatest. A prophet but not the Prophet. This view would never do. It condemned Him with faint praise. If He were only another man He was a fraud because He claimed to be equal with God the Father.

16:15, 16 So He asked the disciples who they believed He was. This brought from Simon Peter the historic confession, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” In other words, He was Israel’s Messiah and God the Son.

16:17, 18 Our Lord pronounced a blessing on Simon, son of Jonah. The fisherman had not arrived at this concept of the Lord Jesus through intellect or native wisdom; it had been supernaturally revealed to him by God the Father. But the Son had something important to say to Peter also. So Jesus added, “And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it.” We all know that more controversy has swirled around this verse than almost any other verse in the Gospel. The question is, “Who or what is the rock?” Part of the problem arises from the fact that the Greek words for Peter and for rock are similar, but the meanings are different. The first, petros, means a stone or loose rock; the second, petra, means rock, such as a rocky ledge. So what Jesus really said was “… you are Peter (stone), and on this rock I will build My church.” He did not say He would build His church on a stone but on a rock.

If Peter is not the rock, then what is? If we stick to the context, the obvious answer is that the rock is Peter’s confession that Christ is the Son of the living God, the truth on which the church is founded. Ephesians 2:20 teaches that the church is built on Jesus Christ, the chief cornerstone. Its statement that we are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets refers not to them, but to the foundation laid in their teachings concerning the Lord Jesus Christ.

Christ is spoken of as a Rock in 1 Corinthians 10:4. In this connection, Morgan gives a helpful reminder:

Remember, He was talking to Jews. If we trace the figurative use of the word rock through Hebrew Scriptures, we find that it is never used symbolically of man, but always of God. So here at Caesarea Philippi, it is not upon Peter that the Church is built. Jesus did not trifle with figures of speech. He took up their old Hebrew illustration—rock, always the symbol of Deity—and said, “Upon God Himself—Christ, the Son of the living God—I will build my church.”

Peter never spoke of himself as the foundation of the church. Twice he referred to Christ as a Stone (Acts 4:11, 12; 1 Pet. 2:4–8), but then the figure is different; the stone is the head of the corner, not the foundation.

“I will build My church.” Here we have the first mention of the church in the Bible. It did not exist in the OT. The church, still future when Jesus spoke these words, was formed on the Day of Pentecost and is composed of all true believers in Christ, both Jew and Gentile. A distinct society known as the body and bride of Christ, it has a unique heavenly calling and destiny.

We would scarcely expect the church to be introduced in Matthew’s Gospel where Israel and the kingdom are the prominent themes. However, consequent to Israel’s rejection of Christ, a parenthetical period—the church age—follows and will continue to the Rapture. Then God will resume His dealings with Israel nationally. So it is fitting that God should introduce the church here as the next step in His dispensational program after Israel’s rejection.

“The gates of Hades shall not prevail against it” may be understood in two ways. First the gates of Hades are pictured in an unsuccessful offensive against the church—the church will survive all attacks upon it. Or the church itself may be pictured as taking the offensive and coming off the victor. In either case, the powers of death will be defeated by the translation of living believers and by the resurrection of the dead in Christ.

16:19 “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven” does not mean that Peter was given authority to admit men to heaven. This has to do with the kingdom of heaven on earth—the sphere containing all who profess allegiance to the King, all who claim to be Christians. Keys speak of access or entrance. The keys which open the door to the sphere of profession are suggested in the Great Commission (Matt. 28:19)—discipling, baptizing, and teaching. (Baptism is not necessary for salvation but is the initiatory rite by which men publicly profess allegiance to the King.) Peter first used the keys on the Day of Pentecost. They were not given to him exclusively, but as a representative of all the disciples. (See Matt. 18:18 where the same promise is given to them all.)

“Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” This and a companion passage in John 20:23 are sometimes used to teach that Peter and his supposed successors were given the authority to forgive sins. We know that this cannot be so; only God can forgive sins.

There are two ways of understanding the verse. First, it may mean that the apostles had power to bind and to loose that we do not have today. For example, Peter bound their sins on Ananias and Sapphira so that they were punished with instant death (Acts 5:1–10), while Paul loosed the disciplined man in Corinth from the consequences of his sin because the man had repented (2 Cor. 2:10).

Or the verse may mean that whatever the apostles bound or loosed on earth must have already been bound or loosed in heaven (see NKJV margin). Thus Ryrie says, “Heaven, not the apostles, initiates all binding and loosing, while the apostles announce these things.”35

The only way in which the verse is true today is in a declarative sense. When a sinner truly repents of his sins and receives Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, a Christian can declare that person’s sins to be forgiven. When a sinner rejects the Savior, a Christian worker can declare his sins to be retained. William Kelly writes, “Whenever the Church acts in the name of the Lord and really does His will, the stamp of God is upon their deeds.”

16:20 Again we find the Lord Jesus commanding His disciples to tell no one that He was the Messiah. Because of Israel’s unbelief, no good could come from such a disclosure. And positive harm might come from a popular movement to crown Him King; such an ill-timed move would be ruthlessly crushed by the Romans.

Stewart, who calls this section the turning point of Jesus’ ministry, writes:

The day at Caesarea Philippi marks the watershed of the Gospels. From this point onward the streams begin to flow in another direction. The current of popularity which seemed likely in the earlier days of Jesus’ ministry to carry him to a throne has now been left behind. The tide sets toward the Cross.… At Caesarea, Jesus stood, as it were on a dividing line. It was like a hilltop from which he could see behind him all the road he had traveled and in front of him the dark, forbidding way awaiting him. One look he cast back to where the afterglow of happy days still lingered and then faced round and marched forward toward the shadows. His course was now set to Calvary.

What Do They Say 16:13-14

16:13, 14 Caesarea Philippi was about twenty-five miles north of the Sea of Galilee and five miles east of the Jordan.
When Jesus came to the surrounding villages (), an incident generally recognized as the apex of His teaching ministry occurred.
What the news on the street?
He began by asking His disciples what men were saying as to His identity.
What are others saying?
The replies ran the gamut from John the Baptist, to Elijah, to Jeremiah, to one of the other prophets.
To the average person He was one among many. Good but not the Best.
Great but not the Greatest.

People were saying various things. Some, like Herod, said He was John the Baptist risen from the dead. Others, basing their opinion on the closing verses of the last of the Old Testament prophets, thought Jesus was Elijah (Malachi 4:5).

Because of a legend preserved by the Jews, some people thought that Jesus was Jeremiah.[2] According to the legend Jeremiah, by God’s command, had hidden the tabernacle, the ark, and the altar of incense in a cave on mount Pisgah. This cave would not be located until the time came for God to restore glory to Israel. Appended to the legend was a prophecy that Jeremiah would rise from the dead to reveal this cave and its contents.

The last group mentioned by the disciples were those who, having no certain view at all, suspected that Christ was “one of the prophets.” The disciples took no cognizance of the blasphemous view of the leaders of Israel who simply wrote the Lord off as an impostor.

Such were the various opinions men had of Jesus. The common people ranked Him with the holiest and greatest individuals in the nation’s history, but that would never do. To rank the Lord with other human beings, however honored, was to do Him grave dishonor. He is not to be compared with other men at all.

A prophet but not the Prophet. This view would never do. It condemned Him with faint praise.
If He were only another man He was a fraud because He claimed to be equal with God the Father.
People were saying various things. Some, like Herod, said He was John the Baptist risen from the dead.
Others, basing their opinion on the closing verses of the last of the Old Testament prophets, thought Jesus was Elijah ().
The last group mentioned by the disciples were those who, having no certain view at all, suspected that Christ was “one of the prophets.”
Such were the various opinions men had of Jesus. The common people ranked Him with the holiest and greatest individuals in the nation’s history, but that would never do.
Such were the various opinions men had of Jesus. The common people ranked Him with the holiest and greatest individuals in the nation’s history, but that would never do. To rank the Lord with other human beings, however honored, was to do Him grave dishonor. He is not to be compared with other men at all.
To rank the Lord with other human beings, however honored, was to do Him grave dishonor. He is not to be compared with other men at all.
Today most claim:
He was a real person
The bible exaggerates his life
He did God works
He was not necessarily God
Key Notice the disciples knew what others thought of Jesus!
They knew that state of their world concerning Christ.
This is very important that we know what our community thinks of Christ.
To witness effectively we must know where they are coming from.
What does our community think of Christ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erK28tenDnA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMzKHFnD29E
Notice the antagonism toward the question?
Answer to questions can reveal a lot about a person?
Man came and he was stating he was a civil engineer.
But i asked him a few questions and it was obvious he was lying.
Who do you say Jesus is?

II What Do You Say 16:15-16

The Lord ignored the answer to the first question and asked His disciples the second question: “Whom say ye that I am?”

The Lord ignored the answer to the first question and asked His disciples the second question: “Whom say ye that I am?”
16:15, 16 So He asked the disciples who they believed He was.
16:15, 16 So He asked the disciples who they believed He was. This brought from Simon Peter the historic confession, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” In other words, He was Israel’s Messiah and God the Son.
This brought from Simon Peter the historic confession, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” In other words, He was Israel’s Messiah and God the Son.

Peter rose to the occasion. “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God,” he said. The answer was marvelous in its conciseness and comprehensiveness. Peter acknowledged Jesus to be both human and divine; he recognized that the Son of man is the Son of God. By saying, “Thou art the Christ,” Peter put Him on the throne of Israel as the Lord’s anointed Prophet, Priest, and King. By saying, “Thou art … the Son of the living God,” Peter put Him on the throne of the universe.

Peter’s great confession is the cardinal creed of the church. Jesus is the Christ. He is God’s own Son. He is the Messiah. He is God incarnate. He is truly man; He is God in essence and in substance.

Peter rose to the occasion. “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God,” he said. The answer was marvelous in its conciseness and comprehensiveness. Peter acknowledged Jesus to be both human and divine; he recognized that the Son of man is the Son of God. By saying, “Thou art the Christ,” Peter put Him on the throne of Israel as the Lord’s anointed Prophet, Priest, and King. By saying, “Thou art … the Son of the living God,” Peter put Him on the throne of the universe.
Peter’s great confession is the cardinal creed of the church. Jesus is the Christ. He is God’s own Son. He is the Messiah. He is God incarnate. He is truly man; He is God in essence and in substance.
Illustration - he is all God and all man.
What do you say?
Lets me ask that question to each of you tonight?
Would we be like me in college physics class.
Out loud in front of a hundred people .... what is the formula ???
John 20:30–31 KJV 1900
And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.
John 20.30-

III What Does the Lord Say 16:16-17

16:17, 18 Our Lord pronounced a blessing on Simon, son of Jonah.
The fisherman had not arrived at this concept of the Lord Jesus through intellect or native wisdom; it had been supernaturally revealed to him by God the Father.
But the Son had something important to say to Peter also.
The Lord instantly acknowledged Peter’s confession and identified the source of his inspiration: “Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.” Bar-jona means “son of Jona.” The Lord called Peter “Bar-jona” to illustrate how true his confession was—the Lord was as truly the Son of God as Peter was the son of Jona
If Peter is not the rock, then what is?
If we stick to the context, the obvious answer is that the rock is Peter’s confession that Christ is the Son of the living God, the truth on which the church is founded. teaches that the church is built on Jesus Christ, the chief cornerstone. Its statement that we are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets refers not to them, but to the foundation laid in their teachings concerning the Lord Jesus Christ.
Christ is spoken of as a Rock in . In this connection, Morgan gives a helpful reminder:
Remember, He was talking to Jews. If we trace the figurative use of the word rock through Hebrew Scriptures, we find that it is never used symbolically of man, but always of God. So here at Caesarea Philippi, it is not upon Peter that the Church is built. Jesus did not trifle with figures of speech. He took up their old Hebrew illustration—rock, always the symbol of Deity—and said, “Upon God Himself—Christ, the Son of the living God—I will build my church.”
Peter never spoke of himself as the foundation of the church. Twice he referred to Christ as a Stone (, ; ), but then the figure is different; the stone is the head of the corner, not the foundation.
“I will build My church.” Here we have the first mention of the church in the Bible. It did not exist in the OT. The church, still future when Jesus spoke these words, was formed on the Day of Pentecost and is composed of all true believers in Christ, both Jew and Gentile. A distinct society known as the body and bride of Christ, it has a unique heavenly calling and destiny.
We would scarcely expect the church to be introduced in Matthew’s Gospel where Israel and the kingdom are the prominent themes. However, consequent to Israel’s rejection of Christ, a parenthetical period—the church age—follows and will continue to the Rapture. Then God will resume His dealings with Israel nationally. So it is fitting that God should introduce the church here as the next step in His dispensational program after Israel’s rejection.
“The gates of Hades shall not prevail against it” may be understood in two ways. First the gates of Hades are pictured in an unsuccessful offensive against the church—the church will survive all attacks upon it. Or the church itself may be pictured as taking the offensive and coming off the victor. In either case, the powers of death will be defeated by the translation of living believers and by the resurrection of the dead in Christ.
16:19 “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven” does not mean that Peter was given authority to admit men to heaven. This has to do with the kingdom of heaven on earth—the sphere containing all who profess allegiance to the King, all who claim to be Christians. Keys speak of access or entrance. The keys which open the door to the sphere of profession are suggested in the Great Commission ()—discipling, baptizing, and teaching. (Baptism is not necessary for salvation but is the initiatory rite by which men publicly profess allegiance to the King.) Peter first used the keys on the Day of Pentecost. They were not given to him exclusively, but as a representative of all the disciples. (See where the same promise is given to them all.)
“Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” This and a companion passage in are sometimes used to teach that Peter and his supposed successors were given the authority to forgive sins. We know that this cannot be so; only God can forgive sins.
There are two ways of understanding the verse. First, it may mean that the apostles had power to bind and to loose that we do not have today. For example, Peter bound their sins on Ananias and Sapphira so that they were punished with instant death (), while Paul loosed the disciplined man in Corinth from the consequences of his sin because the man had repented ().
Or the verse may mean that whatever the apostles bound or loosed on earth must have already been bound or loosed in heaven (see NKJV margin). Thus Ryrie says, “Heaven, not the apostles, initiates all binding and loosing, while the apostles announce these things.”35
The only way in which the verse is true today is in a declarative sense. When a sinner truly repents of his sins and receives Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, a Christian can declare that person’s sins to be forgiven. When a sinner rejects the Savior, a Christian worker can declare his sins to be retained. William Kelly writes, “Whenever the Church acts in the name of the Lord and really does His will, the stamp of God is upon their deeds.”
16:20 Again we find the Lord Jesus commanding His disciples to tell no one that He was the Messiah. Because of Israel’s unbelief, no good could come from such a disclosure. And positive harm might come from a popular movement to crown Him King; such an ill-timed move would be ruthlessly crushed by the Romans.
Stewart, who calls this section the turning point of Jesus’ ministry, writes:
The day at Caesarea Philippi marks the watershed of the Gospels. From this point onward the streams begin to flow in another direction. The current of popularity which seemed likely in the earlier days of Jesus’ ministry to carry him to a throne has now been left behind. The tide sets toward the Cross.… At Caesarea, Jesus stood, as it were on a dividing line. It was like a hilltop from which he could see behind him all the road he had traveled and in front of him the dark, forbidding way awaiting him. One look he cast back to where the afterglow of happy days still lingered and then faced round and marched forward toward the shadows. His course was now set to Calvary.
Exploring the Gospel of Matthew: An Expository Commentary (b) Peter’s Investiture (16:17–20)

The Lord instantly acknowledged Peter’s confession and identified the source of his inspiration: “Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.” Bar-jona means “son of Jona.” The Lord called Peter “Bar-jona” to illustrate how true his confession was—the Lord was as truly the Son of God as Peter was the son of Jona

for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee—“This is not the fruit of human teaching.”

for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee—“This is not the fruit of human teaching.”
The Lord instantly acknowledged Peter’s confession and identified the source of his inspiration: “Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.” Bar-jona means “son of Jona.” The Lord called Peter “Bar-jona” to illustrate how true his confession was—the Lord was as truly the Son of God as Peter was the son of Jona
To know the Son is a miracle from God!
for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee—“This is not the fruit of human teaching.”
Titus 3:3–5 KJV 1900
For we ourselves also were sometimes foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another. But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared, Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;
What asking you to know?
Who is Jesus?

Related Media
See more
Related Sermons
See more