The Source of Theology: Revelation
The Source of Theology
Models of Revelation
• Model 1: Revelation as Doctrine (God as Teacher)
• Model 2: Revelation as History (God as Actor)
• Model 3: Revelation as Inner Experience (God as Guest)
• Model 4: Revelation as Dialectical Encounter (God as Judge)
• Model 5: Revelation as New Awareness (God as Poet)
Toward a Biblical Doctrine of Revelation
None of these models, by itself, can account for the diversity of actual occurrences of revelation in Scripture.
Revelation Depends on Divine Initiative
Louis Berkhof reminds us, “It should be observed that in theology it [revelation] never denotes a mere passive, perhaps unconscious, becoming manifest, but always a conscious, voluntary, and intentional deed of God, by which he reveals or communicates divine truth.” In other words, human beings do not discover God; God reveals himself. God is never the revealed object without being the revealing subject.
One weakness in all of the theories proposed above is the tendency to reduce God’s communication to revealing. However, God’s speech does not merely interpret history; it creates it. Revelation is not gnosis or enlightenment: a way of salvation by discovering God’s hidden essence or will. It is never an end in itself, whether as supernatural information, existential encounter, or as inner experience and heightened awareness. God reveals himself only inasmuch and insofar as he deems necessary for our invocation of him for our salvation and life
Revelation Serves Redemption
One weakness in all of the theories proposed above is the tendency to reduce God’s communication to revealing. However, God’s speech does not merely interpret history; it creates it. Revelation is not gnosis or enlightenment: a way of salvation by discovering God’s hidden essence or will. It is never an end in itself, whether as supernatural information, existential encounter, or as inner experience and heightened awareness. God reveals himself only inasmuch and insofar as he deems necessary for our invocation of him for our salvation and life
Propositions without Propositionalism
Revelation and Mediation: A Way with Words
In short, for the Reformers, revelation is never as lofty as univocal knowledge nor as inadequate as equivocal knowledge, and this accommodated revelation is given directly in Scripture. To put it crudely, God gets the job done. He displays his power in weakness and his wisdom in what Greeks consider folly. God is capable of revealing himself, his will and works, and his redemptive plans through creaturely mediation. The creatures themselves are not worthy, but God sanctifies them for his loving and sovereign purposes.
The Word of God
In this way, God ensures that there is a normative canon (or constitution) on the basis of which contemporary preaching continues to be a medium of Christ’s saving activity in the world. Since I treat the topic of preaching as a means of grace under ecclesiology, I will focus here on general revelation and, in the following chapter, on Scripture. Before considering the scope of revelation, it is important to distinguish the two parts of the Word of God.
The Word of God as Law and Gospel
But the gospel did not so supplant the entire law as to bring forward a different way of salvation. Rather, it confirmed and satisfied whatever the law had promised, and gave substance to the shadows. When Christ says, “The Law and the Prophets were until John” [Luke 16:16; cf. Matt. 11:13], he does not subject the patriarchs to the curse that the slaves of the law cannot escape. He means: they had been trained in rudiments only, thus remaining far beneath the height of the gospel teaching.
The law’s imperatives tell us what must be done; the gospel’s indicatives tell us what God has done.
There is still law in the covenant of grace. However, it is no longer able to condemn believers, but directs them in lives of gratitude for God’s mercy in Christ.
God’s Revelation in Creation: General Revelation
In Western theology and philosophy, we may discern two broad approaches to general revelation, approaches that may be defined in terms of a recurring struggle over the relation of reason and revelation, nature and grace, logic and faith. Roman Catholic theology, on one hand, even when admirably defending the coinherence of faith and reason, typically assumes an underlying ontological dualism between nature and grace that provokes this problem in the first place. Roman Catholic theology teaches that grace elevates nature, orienting it to the supernatural, away from the lower self (the body and its passions). Grace is a substance that is added (infused) to nature in order to direct the aim of its gaze upward from material things to spiritual reality. For Lutheran and Reformed theologies, on the other hand, there is no such thing as a gift of grace superadded to nature (donum superadditum); creation p 141 itself is a gift (donum concreatum). Grace, however, is a particular kind of gift: God’s merciful favor toward sinners. The Reformers challenged the idea that there was some inherent tendency toward sin in God’s creation. Grace is therefore not given to already good creatures in order to elevate them beyond nature, but to sinners in order to redeem and renew their nature so that it may be “created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness” (Eph 4:24).