Jonah and Judgment
Monthly Vision Casting
Quarrels over most issues usually end up including personal attacks and judgmental attitudes
He suggests that our criticism of a fellow believer involves standing in judgment over that believer.
But how can James claim that criticism of a fellow believer is tantamount to criticism of the law? Clearly a part of the argument is missing; but James’s shift to the word “neighbor” at the end of v. 12 implies what we need to supply. That word must be a reminiscence of the love command—confirming the suspicion that James might have Leviticus 19 in mind throughout. So James assumes that criticism of a fellow believer contradicts the demand that we love our neighbors. Therefore, we fail to keep the law when we slander and stand in judgment over one another. And in failing to keep the law, James says, we also “judge” it.
Since James contrasts “judging” the law with “keeping” it, he apparently thinks that failure to do the law implies a denial of the law’s authority. However high and orthodox our view of God’s law might be, a failure actually to do it says to the world that we do not in fact put much store by it. Again we see coming to the surface James’s understanding of Christianity as something whose reality is to be tested by the measure of obedience.
But there is another reason why slandering another is so wrong: it also involves an infringement on the unique right of God himself: There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy.
James rebukes jealous, censorious speech by which we condemn others as being wrong in the sight of God.