Fruits: Taming the Tongue
Fruits: Taming the Tongue
His father, Lord Randolph Churchill, detested Winston; his mother merely paid him no attention. That Winston was a disappointment as a student (he scored 53 percent in English composition on his entrance exam to Sandhurst, the British military academy) seemed to confirm their parental opinion and, in their minds, justified parental neglect. Upon graduation from Sandhurst young Winston imagined that his father would be proud. Instead Randolf was furious that he had not scored high enough to make it into the 60th rifles, a “crack regiment.” Randolf wrote a letter to his son containing these venomous words:
Do not think I am going to take the trouble of writing to you long letters after every failure you commit and undergo.… I no longer attach the slightest weight to anything you may say about your own acquirements & exploits.… If you cannot prevent yourself from leading the idle useless unprofitable life you have had during your schooldays & later months, you will become a mere social wastrel one of the hundreds of the public school failures, and you will degenerate into a shabby unhappy & futile existence. If that is so you have to bear all the blame for such misfortunes yourself.
Randolf ended the letter brutally: “Your mother sends her love.”
thoughtless “chattering” (10:8; cf. 12:18; 29:20); lying (12:19); arrogant boasting (18:12); gossiping (10:18). Think what enormous, sometimes irreversible, harm can be caused to people by unsubstantiated, often false, rumors. Such a rumor can be harder to stop than any forest fire (v. 5).
The fourth element in James’ searching analysis of the tongue is that it involves us so easily in the deadly sin of inconsistency, one
In verse 7 the words by humankind are literally ‘by human nature’ or, possibly better, ‘by a nature that is merely human’; and in verse 8, no human being is ‘no-one is able to tame—(that is to say) of men’. James does not simply say that the tongue is untameable, but that it cannot be subdued by any power resident in mere human nature or possessed by a mere human being. Beyond this he does not go, but he may feel that the hint is plain enough. On the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:2–4) a different fire from that which ascends from Gehenna descended from heaven to kindle new powers and give new speech to the human tongue. If we must say that the outworking of sin first appeared in the abuse of speech (Gn. 3:12; see p. 119, above), we must also say that the first act in the new creation was the renewal of the power of speech, a tongue intelligibly declaring the wonderful works of God (Acts 2:11). Maybe this is what James wants us to learn from verses 7–8a. Would not this be a marvellous display of the glory of the Lord Jesus Christ in our lives, if our tongues were as his: ‘No man ever spoke like this man!’ (Jn. 7:46)?