Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.15UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.43UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.59LIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.73LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.18UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.67LIKELY
Extraversion
0.49UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.36UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.58LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
All people are equal
If you went to a large gathering of people, say in a shopping centre or at a sports event, and asked people randomly if they believe everybody is of equal value and worth, my suggestion is that you will find very few people who would disagree with that idea.
It is a foundational value of most western democracies and is foundational for our democratic system of government.
What very few people in western nations don’t ever consider is, the origin of that idea and why we do believe that all people are equal.
Two caveats
Before we go further, it is helpful to add two caveats on what we say about equality.
First Caveat
While we say we believe all people are equal, our society seldom treats people equally.
It is an ideal we aim for but mostly fail to live out either personally or as a community.
While it’s true that we fail to hold this value, that does not mean we don’t have an underlying assumption that it’s a value that we ought to hold.
Society doesn’t treat all people equally.
Not all ideas are equal
Second Caveat
While all people are equal that does not mean all ideas are equal.
Everyone has equal value, but the values and ideals people espouse are not equal.
It is not hard to think of some abhorrent ideas that people have sort to implement over the centuries.
Think of the ethnic cleansing and purging of communities undertaken by Hitler, Pol Pot or even the recent actions of the Myanmar military against the Rohingya minorities.
In communities where we hold to people being equal, purging a society of an ethnic group due to their heritage strikes us as being appalling.
Those who push these attitudes and actions are of equal value as anyone else, but that does not mean we give their ideas equal value.
We have always believed people are all equal.
If we ask people why we think all people are equal, the response will usually be that is what everyone thinks and that is what everyone has always thought.
Neither of these responses are true.
People have not always treated everyone as equal.
At the time of Jesus, in the Greco Roman world, they did not believe people were of equal worth.
The Greek philosophers such as Aristotle and Plato did not believe people were equal.
Aristotle believed that society was structurally unequal and that there was a subclass, the slaves, who were there to serve those who were the aristocracy.
He referred to slaves as “anthropedon”, a neuter term, neither male nor female, a non-person.
Aristotle also saw slaves as being born into that role, the property of their owners, and he viewed them as “living tools”.
In his book ‘Politics’ he wrote “Indeed the use made of slaves and of tame animals is not very different; for both with their bodies minister to the needs of life”.
It was into this world, a world of structural inequality, that Jesus taught and treated people with equal dignity and worth.
Around the world today there are communities with structural inequality.
If a nation follows the logical conclusions of Hindu teaching, the outcome will be structural inequality.
This concept is underpinned by two key ideas.
Firstly, reincarnation- where every soul returns again and again.
Secondly, your behaviour in each life impacts your place in the next life, which is referred to as karma.
So, the upper cast Brahmins felt justified in privilege as this reflects their past life.
This is a culture where inequality is institutionalised via religious philosophy.
So why did Jesus and the early church treat people as equal, and where did that idea spring from?
This is an Old Testament concept from Jewish faith that is foundational for Christian belief.
In Genesis 1:26-27 we read that God created humanity in the imagine of Himself.
The scripture goes on to say that “male and female He created them”.
All humanity has the stamp of God on them.
The whole of scripture echoes this idea; you are of worth because you were created by God, reflecting the image of God.
This means that whether you are brilliant, powerful and wealthy, or poor, disabled, or unable to contribute in certain ways, you are of equal worth.
It is a truth we believe and hold to.
The Psalmist reinforces this concept by writing (Psalm 139:13-16) NIV translation below
It is helpful to remember that this became the foundation for modern democracies such as the United States.
In their Declaration of Independence, it states …
“We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal.”
Recently, atheist scholar Yuval Harari (quoted in Os Guinness’ book “Impossible People” pages 132 – 133) has commented:
“The idea of equality is inextricably intertwined with the idea of creation.
Americans got the idea of equality from Christianity, which argues that every person has a directly created soul, and that all people are equal before God.”
As an atheist and an evolutionist, Harari does not believe in creation so he believes these ideas built into the US constitution ought to be changed, his suggestion being: “created equal should therefore be translated evolved differently”.
Jesus taught and treated people as if they were equal.
As we have mentioned, at a time where they believed in structural inequality, Jesus taught equality.
Matthew 18: 10-14
Jesus tells a parable of a lost sheep.
The shepherd leaves the ninety-nine sheep and goes after the one lost.
This story demonstrates that everyone matters.
John 10: 1-13
This passage is a mix of two different ways in which shepherds dealt with the sheep under their care.
The first is in verses 1-6.
The scene here is the common pen holding sheep in the village overnight.
A number of different shepherds would come in off the hills and place their sheep in a common pen for safe keeping until they were ready to take their flock back out into the countryside.
When they were ready, they would go to the gate of the pen (v3) and collect their sheep.
They entered through the gate, not over the fence, as thieves entered via other methods.
They knew their sheep and called them out.
The sheep followed the shepherd whom they knew and trusted.
The second way (verses 7-13) is where the shepherd is out in the countryside with his sheep for a number of days, away from the village and common pen.
In this situation, the shepherd built a small holding pen from branches and bushes.
There was no door to his pen, but the shepherd would lie down across the gap and he was the door and the protector of the sheep in the pen overnight.
Galatians 3:28
Paul writes to the churches in Galatia and reminds them that in Christ all the old barriers and classes have been broken down and destroyed.
We are all now equal and he draws on three structural inequalities of the Greco Roman world to make his point and reminds his readers that this is now changed:
“There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”
Christianity is foundational to the idea of equality.
As scholars have looked over the development of human history and the importance of the individual, they have found that the teachings of Jesus and the Christian church are foundational to the idea of equality.
This is demonstrated in the book “Inventing the Individual” by Larry Seidentop.
After teaching at Keeble College in Oxford for several decades, he released this book which looks at the development in the significance of the individual in western democracies.
He writes:
“Christianity changed the ground of human identity... by emphasising the moral equality of humans, quite apart from any social roles they might occupy, Christianity changed 'the name of the game.' Social rules became secondary.
They followed and, in a crucial sense, had to be understood as subordinate to a God-given human identity, something all humans share equally."
In a western world where wealth, power, social standing and prominence lifts some above the pack, leaving many feeling insignificant and irrelevant, we all need to hear this message clearly and we need to communicate it clearly.
Everyone matters equally!
Not because of what you have achieved, or who you know, or your number of Facebook friends or Instagram followers.
Everyone matters
Which is why so many of us have fundamental issues with news reporting.
We do not understand why some people get all the coverage yet others are often ignored.
Why those like us, white English speaking, get greater coverage.
But those who are other, not white of a different ethnic background, hardly rate a mention.
I am reminded of a skit which used to appear on ABC TV called the D Generation.
This was of course in the days when the ABC wasn’t so politically correct.
People were still able to be incredibly confronting about the hypocrisy and blind spots in society.
They had a mock TV news broadcast where they would report on the various disasters and tragedies around the world.
On the screen behind the “news presenter” they had a Deathometer.
This device recorded the number of deaths in each news story.
But there was a twist.
If Australians died then it would go up.
Car crash kills 4 in Sydney, Deathometer would go up 4 places.
10 000 die in earthquake in Pakistan, Deathometer would go up 1 place.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9